Posted on 01/22/2023 9:50:12 AM PST by Ozguy1945
King Charles is a figurehead.
He reigns as King but does not rule.
However he is the titular head and moral leader of both the Anglican Church and the British Commonwealth Of Nation.
So I now exercise the free speech right to push for him to show moral leadership and recognise the crisis of morality within the institutions of his realm which undermines the authority of those institutions.
Lol. This is the man who, with his mother, covered up more than 30 years of Muslim sexual abuse.
Isn’t Charles dedicated to leftist subversion?
An argument can be made that the monarch must stay out of politics and controversies. I cannot accept that argument when it comes to things like the decades-long Muslim sexual abuse of children.
If the monarch cannot or will not act in such cases, then I see no value in the monarchy.
Do you have a link?
Don't forget about the tourist attraction money of the changing of the guard at Buckingham Palace and the beauty of Westminster Abbey, etc.
There used to be articles about it on FR.
Thank you for the link. I went thru it & there is not one mention, unless I missed it, of the queen or Charles. What am I missing?
Your link has NO reference to the royal family being involved. Why did you put that out there? What am I missing?
Also, they were both friends with Jimmy Saville, in fact, he was an adviser of theirs.
They carry no legal weight with that whatsoever. You should really be not making scurrilous claims against people when you have no facts to back that up. And do you really think they knew at the time about jimmy saville?
You could then blame all of Britain’s crime in the royal family. Which would be absurd. They are figure heads.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.