Posted on 03/24/2021 10:34:34 AM PDT by ransomnote
This post is organized to present 4 points to consider, and then a few key questions regarding these considerations, and finally overall observations that together, I believe, demonstrate that the vaccines, and their ‘rushed’ trials are mixtures of fabrications.
Referencing his 30+ years of experience working in the vaccine industry, Dr. Yeadon makes the case that the PRC test renders false positive test results for approximately 90% of tests administered, and that false negatives are also reported. The publication date is 9/20/2020 at which time Dr. Yeadon states that he believes the vaccines will be pulled from the marked within 6 months following introduction.
From the article:
“Because of the high false positive rate and the low prevalence, almost every positive test, a so-called case, identified by Pillar 2 since May of this year has been a FALSE POSITIVE. Not just a few percent. Not a quarter or even a half of the positives are FALSE, but around 90% of them. Put simply, the number of people Mr Hancock sombrely tells us about is an overestimate by a factor of about ten-fold. Earlier in the summer, it was an overestimate by about 20-fold.”
Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics – the Deadly Danger of False Positives
3/22/2021, 10:13:02 AM · by ransomnote · 15 replies
lockdownsceptics.org ^ | September 20, 2020 | Dr Michael Yeadon
In the following article, the author makes the case that the PCR is invalid because it doesn’t identify the Covid-19 virus.
The PCR test identifies manufacturers’ specified strings of molecules (i.e., ‘primer sequenes’) said to be present in the Covid-19 virus.
From the article, “The CDC is using 12 different computer data base "primer" sequences, varying from 17 to 21 nucleotide sequences in a row to look for Covaids, the same sequence found in goats, papayas, river water, motor oil, etc.”
The same small sequence found in goats, papayas, your pyjamas”
“The WHO was using human Chromosome 8 as their test database “primer” sequence to detect Covaids, which was looking for the 18 in a row nucleotide sequence ctccctttgt tgtgttgt, which is found on the 8th out of the 23 pairs of chromosomal trees on all humans.“
https://images.hive.blog/DQmUtVYWuvrdvqvqqe9xwqQtu8QBPbKwJPDhPRTgtNqnXEy/image.png
From the article:
“A so called PCR "test" is NOT a test.
It's Nobel Prize winning inventor, Kary Mullis, himself was furious that it was being used for any such nonsense as it can neither “test” for anything nor prove how much of any detected genetic material is inside anybody, let alone tell anyone if whatever it does detect is the cause of any illness or disease or not.”
PLAGUE OF FEAR 2020 - Part 7 - THE NAIL IN COVID'S COFFIN
3/18/2021, 5:53:41 PM · by ransomnote · 11 replies
hive.blog ^ | Jan 31, 2020 | Steve Falconer, francesleader
https://images.hive.blog/DQmdj7E5B62nrFFJ8JHuDbcTuxEXSx2pEWtXx5eZGG6pKvJ/image.png
For example, the following is excerpted from Moderna’s Phase 3 trial report.
The primary efficacy analysis population (referred to as the Per-Protocol Set), included 28,207 participants who received two doses (at 0 and 1 month) of either Moderna COVID‑19 Vaccine (n=14,134) or placebo (n=14,073), and had a negative baseline SARS‑CoV‑2 status.
The median length of follow up for efficacy for participants in the study was 9 weeks post Dose There were 11 COVID‑19 cases in the Moderna COVID‑19 Vaccine group and 185 cases in the placebo group, with a vaccine efficacy of 94.1% (95% confidence interval of 89.3% to 96.8%).
Cases of COVID‑19, starting 14 days after Dose 2, were defined as symptomatic COVID‑19 requiring positive RT-PCR result and at least two systemic symptoms or one respiratory symptom.
Among all participants in the Per-Protocol Set analysis, which included COVID‑19 cases confirmed by an adjudication committee, no cases of severe COVID‑19 were reported in the Moderna COVID‑19 Vaccine group compared with 30 cases reported in the placebo group (incidence rate 9.138 per 1,000 person-years). One PCR-positive case of severe COVID‑19 in a vaccine recipient was awaiting adjudication at the time of the analysis.”
The following are just a few of the problems with using an invalid test to validate Covid-19 vaccine trials.
“In another promising medical development, the biotechnology company Moderna has announced its COVID-19 vaccine could be up to 94.5% effective.
The news comes a week after Pfizer announced its vaccine could be up to 90% effective based on a similar, early analysis from its Phase 3 trial.”
I think it’s reasonable to assume that vaccine trial participants were give the PCR ‘test’ repeatedly: at the start of the trial, after Dose 1, after Dose 2, and then routinely through the 4 or so weeks of monitoring following to see at what point they might supposedly contract (e.g., subject’s PCR ‘test’ positive 10 days after vaccine administration – too soon for vaccine to protect participant).
I think you can see where I’m going here. For the vaccine trials to be valid, the PCR test had to be valid. However the PCR test is not valid for this use, yet the many PCR ‘supposedly’ administered to 28,207 always tracked reliably to portray consistent, reliable, positive vaccine trial results
College students used to have two specific terms for false experimental data.
“Fudging the data”: After the experiment or study failed to return expected outcomes, the data was ‘modified’ to support the experimental hypothesis.
“Dry lab-ing”: While the experimental design specified in detail exacting laboratory and instrumentation critera, phases, tests etc., no actual lab work occurred (no need to wash out beakers, etc. as no real lab work took place).
I have to wonder just HOW the vaccine companies all came up with their data under the circumstances.
I’ll add one more problem with the scenario involving the development of the Covid mRNA vaccines that has me wondering. I haven’t given it a lot of thought but I believe there is something to it.
Initially I was posting that the mRNA technology upon which the mRNA vaccines were based was discovered in 2005; obtained Emergency Use Authorization and in 15 years since has failed to obtain FDA approval; conducted animal trials in 2005 and 2012 in which all animals (cats) developed anti-bodies and then when exposed to the virus being tested at the time (HIV, Hep C, other Coronaviruses), all animals died (their immune systems over-reacted).
Recently a FReeper has been reporting that there was in fact a successful trials which included "mice, ferrets, monkeys and interim report on human trials 2017" using the same nano mRNA technology underpining the Covid vaccines.
Suppressed Information About the Covid-19 Vaccine' | Vol 01 Date: 03/20/2021 (freerepublic.com)
The sources I had consulted made no mention of trials involving mice that survived. I was going to hunt for that data to see if it was correct, but now that I know the trials are worthless, I won’t bother.
Here’s the problem. The mRNA technology was considered an exciting find in 2005 because it could open the door to T-cell immunity which was otherwise little understood but believed to hold tremendous promise for human health.
The first animal trials took place in 2005 and failed. More work was done and the second round of animal trials was performed in 2012 and again met with failure. The mRNA technology under development for the past 15 years never reached human trials or obtained FDA approval.
If the FReeper is correct that trials involving mice which survived took place in 2017, why didn't the researchers move to begin full-scale trials with that technology? 3 years later that technology was modified for use in Covid-19 vaccines, but it seems like nothing happened with the platform technology until it was selected to for modification serve as the basis for the Covid-19 vaccines.
I wonder if I dig up information on this, might I find that Hillary Clinton was expected to win the 2016 election after which time her administration would have required mandatory vaccinations.
Our enemies want to reduce our population to a tame, manageable size. Just wondering. If you’ve seen the ‘Lock Down” scenarios, it does seem that the New World Order types have been planning their worldwide coup for some time, and one of the analyzed scnearios was a pandemic. And then we had Bill Gate’s symposium in 2019 walking through pandemic scenarios. Fauci funded Wuhan long before Wuhan’s ‘accidental’ release of a virus comprised of human/bat/HIV RNA material.
~~~~~~~~~~~
We’ve been betrayed in all aspects of the Planned-Demic since the engineered China virus was first deployed in Yuhan.
The sick were denied all treatment and told to go home until they needed hospitalization. How many illnesses could be spun into a fake Planned-Demic if the public were denied treatment? How can they claim to have a compassionate dedication to protecting us if they refuse us the right to try FDA approved medications when we’re dying?
HCQ and Ivermectin were FDA approved and in use with good track records for decades. The CDC not only banned the off-label use of these drugs during a time they declared an unprecedented medical emergency, they wouldn’t even award these drugs “Emergency Use Authorization” they would later grant their fake vaccines. They denied dying people the right to assume any risks in a final attempt to survive the illness.
They’ve lied to the public and told us the Covid-19 vaccines are FDA approved. Fauci himself said they were when asked on video. He then went on to craftily equate FDA approval with FDA authorization when he knows the difference.
Fauci is on video stating that asymptomatic spread does not drive epidemics; he’ll say whatever needs to be said to advance the narrative, and if it’s that asymptomic spread is devastating and we all have to shut down the economy, schools, and life stay home, he’s your guy.
45 Second Twitter Video Clip of Dr. Fauci Saying. ".... asympomatic spread is rare and historically not a driver of outbreaks. Symptomatic people drive outbreaks."
(sidenote: Fauci's NIH division collaborated with Pfizer to produce their Covid-19 vaccine and in particular, on those mouse trials.)
In the following video interview excerpt on Twitter, the inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, says Dr. Fauci is a liar and not qualified for the position he holds:
Text of Mullis’ comments:
“Guys like Fauci get up there and start talking, you know, he doesn’t know anything really about anything and I’d say that to his face. Nothing. The man thinks you can take a blood sample and stick it in an electron microscope and if it’s got a virus in there you’ll know it. He doesn’t understand electron microscopy and he doesn’t understand medicine and he should not be in a position like he’s in. Most of those guys up there on the top are just total administrative people and they don’t know anything about what’s going on in the body. You know, those guys have got an agenda, which is not what we would like them to have being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda. They make up their own rules as they go. They change them when they want to. And they smugly, like Tony Fauci does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera,”~ Kary Mullis
Where the Covid-19 vaccines are concerned, we’ve been denied informed consent which is required for us to balance the risks versus the benefits of having the vaccine.
All benefits of the vaccine are exaggerated because the spike protein is not specific to Covid-19; we’ve probably already encountered pathogens that caused our bodies to produce the spike proteins triggered by the vaccine. The benefits of the vaccine are non existant because the vaccine is predicated on fake vaccine trials and false positives etc.
The risks of having the vaccine are deleted, purged, and ridiculed as disinformation. Even as the CDC’s VAERS database shows the Covid vaccines are notably at the top of some key observed ‘event categories’ (ER visits, life threatening reactions, Deaths) out of 93 vaccines in just 2 months into their administration.
Silencing the discussion of risk, and therefore denying us informed consent violates the primary tennent of the Nuremberg Code of 1947.
They’ve lied to lock us down and force us to wear useless masks.
Is anyone still hoping that the tightening noose and assault on our rights and our bodies is suddenly going to stop, or better yet, improve? Is it logical to hope that, after telling us to expect that our lives will never be the same and we must henceforth live from vaccination, to vaccination, a life of masked social distancing, the vaccines will actually be a product of their (non existent) integrity and good will or that the vaccines will be worse than all measures leading up to it?
They want to hurt us, to kill us. They still won't allow us to use safe, FDA approved treatments for Covid, insisting we die without it instead in order to drive us to the vaccines. Is that not the obvious conclusion of the unending series of lies driving us like livestock through a maze of narrowing chutes toward enslavement and mandatory vaccinations?
bbb
Bro, right?
You keep pretending we're not under attack and that people who are trying to exterminate us lie awake at night worried about being audited by their friends in other corrupt agencies. The deep state did not leave auditors and their regular reviews processes ethically pristine and simply hope none would ever actually looked at their books. Obviously.
Here are a couple of articles on the SARS-CoV-2 (the virus causing COVID-19) virus whose spike protein was used in the design of the Moderna vaccine.
I get the funny feeling that you don't even realize you contradicted yourself in the very same post AND asnwered your own question.
On the bright side, you don't have to duck-duck-go that one anymore.
Read your above two paragraphs again (real slow) and see if you can figure out why you're stupid.
I'll be back later, got gym class. Mile day.
That's gonna leave a mark.
At times, the lion must select one jackal from the pack and maul it, so as to set an example for the other jackals.
Ironically, the jackal is grateful to have the attention of the lion.
This is a productive exercise.
#TheJungleWatches
“Read your above two paragraphs again (real slow) and see if you can figure out why you’re stupid.”
*******************************************************
I guess I’m missing it but perhaps you can explain. Before YOU explain my stupidity to me, perhaps you can confirm to us dummies that YOU understand that SARS-CoV-2 is the scientific name of the VIRUS that causes the DISEASE COVID-19? You’ll note that, as a courtesy to those who might have been unaware of that FACT, I parenthetically stated that.
Now, where did I contradict myself? Thank you in advance.
And, by the way, here’s a link supporting my assertion that the disease and the virus that causes it have different names:
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30557-2/fulltext
“...I’m specifically not going to give you links to articles not yet posted (including the researcher who delved into the technical aspects of the Covid trials) on FR until I am sure I have extracted all the content I need because trolls like you ask (usually, taunt/demand)for links and it’s not unusual that, shortly after I provide them, I discover the content I’ve been referencing has been deleted.
So your people are using my people to help locate and, if possible, remove content we use to refute your distortions. Remarkably, we still defeat you in debate even though your people have MSM protection and wrap around propaganda to support your positions....”
***********************************************************************
Wow, in post 137 above I simply ask you for a link to something that actually supports yet another bizarre statement you’ve made (and, IMHO, likely made up out of thin air). And your reply is that you won’t do that because, if you do, the linked information will be disappeared. Very bizarre thinking.
No surprise there.
SARS-CoV-2 is the scientific name of the VIRUS that causes the DISEASE COVID-19
Remember how you brilliantly explained that 95% does not equal 100%? In the same school of thought, Cov-2 does not equal Cov-19.
If it did they wouldn't have two different names.
Here's just one line from your link that devestates your argument (I'm into simplicity if possible).
A distinct name is needed for the new coronavirus.
NEW CORONAVIRUS! WHAT?!?!?!
If there is a 'new coronavirus', then there has to be an old one. And guess what, Sherlock. The two are NOT the same.
BLAM.
Its really very simple math. And by that math, the original assertion is correct. The vaccine does not contain the covid 19. Containing the covid 2 is not the same thing, and that should be very easy for you to understand, but somehow for you, it is not. As hard as you try to make it so, covid 2 is not covid 19.
If we work through all that, it adds up to you stupid.
See? Easy peezy math.
You're welcome.
They say that English is one of the hardest languages to learn as an adult due to its sometimes inconsistent rules, but I find it easy to understand now that I'm fluent.
Maybe your road to fluency was interrupted at an early age or interfered with by some childhood trauma (being dropped on head, eating paint chips, having head smooshed in car door).
Ransomnote's comments were in plain English and easy to understand. They were reasonable and based on her long experience researching so-called 'controverial material' on the internet.
Controversial because of people like you. People unwilling to listen to anything that threatens your indoctrination. Stuff does get disappeared off the internet. There ARE people who make that happen.
Did you read the part where she doesn't like to post her sources until she has gleaned all the research she can from them and other sources? No? Skipped that part?
Also, nothing stops you from looking for things yourself. I'd stay away from Snopes and the New York Times, unless you want to understand the derp narrative better. We can glean information from ALL sources.
Anyway. If you think there are no posters on FreeRepublic who's job it is to steer opinion and stifle wrongspeak, then you just may be less intelligent than I already think you are. And that is a very low number.
Matter of fact, I think you are one of those people. So maybe you're not as stupid as you act.
But I do admire how you pretend to not understand things...all the time.
“As hard as you try to make it so, covid 2 is not covid 19.”
******************************************************
I’m not aware of a DISEASE called COVID-2. So why would I try to say a non-existent COVID-2 disease is the actually existing COVID-19 disease? And therefore I’m not trying to “make it so” as you allege.
You are clearly in “Baffle Them With BS”, blowing smoke mode.
Your bafflement is nothing to me. Talk to your mom and dad about that one. They made you.
Let me take a line from the author of this thread, Ransomnote, to help you become unbaffled.
They don't have the isolated Covid-19 virus so they cannot claim to know what spike protein to make, so they chose a spike protein for another type of corona virus.
Does that clear things up? Keyword 'spike protein'. Not 'disease', not 'virus'. 'Spike protein'.
You're welcome.
Let me take a line from the author of this thread, Ransomnote, to help you become unbaffled.
...........................
“They don’t have the isolated Covid-19 virus so they cannot claim to know what spike protein to make, so they chose a spike protein for another type of corona virus.”
............................
Does that clear things up? Keyword ‘spike protein’. Not ‘disease’, not ‘virus’. ‘Spike protein’.
*******************************************************
Wow, you provide a quote from the fiction writer ransomnote that contains three falsehoods that you’re including in the smoke you’re blowing. I’ll clear those falsehoods up.
1. The virus causing the DISEASE COVID-19 has been identified and isolated. The name scientists gave given that isolated virus is SARS-CoV-2.
2. Each individual SARS-CoV-2 virus is covered with many identical copies of the virus’ spike protein. It’s that unique spike protein that the mRNA vaccines cause the immune system to produce antibodies for.
3. So, no, the vaccine makers didn’t “chose a spike protein for another type of corona virus”.
Got more smoke to blow?
No. I'm gonna go take a dump and have a conversation with it.
It will be much more reasonable and productive than talking to you and it will be able to understand the simplest things. You see, even my craps are smarter than you.
Love your cut and pastes, btw.
He said he's concerned that you have the Chinee devil juice flowing through your veins and worries that you are gonna pull an 'Island of Dr Moreux' on us. The only question being what kind of mutant will you become.
He hope's not the people (or poo) eating kind.
Keep us updated.
Signed,
Bagster and his poo
p.s. I got to go sleep now. Jr High starts early.
Sorry that you are so unhappy with your life.
You know nothing.
Another myth.
You know nothing.
Rude.
It seems you don't understand what correlation is. We have massive evidence that after reported positive PCR cases increase the number of hospitalizations and deaths increase on the same curve. That's correlation.
You claim it's because they give sick people the PCR test to fabricate the statistics, which is bizarre paranoiac thinking, but it doesn't matter, it still results in strong correlation.
What they do know is denying all medical treatment... created a false correlation to drive the pandemic.
...when residents became ill, denied them all medical treatment and administered the PCR to them.
You might want to step back and consider what you're saying.
I know medical professionals who have treated and continue to treat Covid patients. You're not being truthful when you say "they" deny Covid patients all medical treatment and deep down you know it. You're so invested in your fantasy that you're making obviously false claims.
I’m a believer in people having what I call “hidden talents”.........I mean something like a Welder being skilled at the piano and can play the classics like no other.
As strange as it seems, I actually like Ransomnote. I think she’s dedicated and means well. I don’t believe she is out to do harm at all.
Now, her hidden talents, we all have them. I’m not convinced however that Ransomnote’s “hidden talents” are in biological infectious diseases and Laboratory experimentation and testing.
Finding things or “information” on the internet has become a blood sport.
For example, if I was a pagan, I could find information on the internet to prove we are really nothing but cells living inside a giant body of a humanoid. But I would find anything about God creating everything.
If I was a Preacher/Minister, I wouldn’t find what the pagan found. I’d find the proof of creation and the great floods and so on.
We here on FreeRepublic often think that if a Leftist were to seek out the same information we rely on, their minds and beliefs would be changed.
The Left think if we Conservatives start taking in the information they get and have, we’d be converted, so to speak.
The same bias can be applied to many aspects.
Anti-vaxxers NEVER seem to find anything positive about vaccinations or any present Covid vaccine.......they don’t think about how the virus has slowed with our chronically sick or elderly, rather they say “Oh well, it’s 99.5% survival rate.”
Tell that to Herman Cain.
O the other hand.......people who have medical training and knowledge who have not had their medical licenses revoked (Thinking of an often posted anti-vaxxer FORMER Doctor on YouTube.) Keep reassuring, keep teaching, keep explaining.
Going back to the Welder and his hidden talents........to fix my broken trailer axel he doesn’t rely on his great piano skill, he needs to use his skill as a Welder.
Just like the many Doctors here on FR who are in a constant battle with people who’s real talent or hidden talent has nothing to do with medicine or genetic bio research. The Docs might be great golfers (LOL) but they’re using their regular skills to educate.
Now, it will be a great day here on FreeRepublic when we finally discover Humblegunner’s skill, or hidden talents......but that might be asking for way to much.
...there is no demonstrated correlation between Covid-19 and hospitalizations and deaths.
You: It seems you don't understand what correlation is. We have massive evidence that after reported positive PCR cases increase the number of hospitalizations and deaths increase on the same curve. That's correlation.
ME: Correction: Your original query to which I was responding was, "You can’t explain why positive PCR tests correlate with hospitalizations and deaths." When I wrote my refutation which you quoted above, I used the word "Covid-19" when I meant to use the word PCR tests.
90% of PCR results are false positives; the increase in testing and the exponential growth in positive results occurred at the same time that hospitalizations and deaths increased due to a mixture of untreated illnesses (some were covid).
Any test the CDC chose to use to diagnose Covid, whether it worked ornot, would show a positive correlation, if you can somehow justify ignoring 90% false positives, because testing would increase and hospitalization/deaths would increase.
YOU: You claim it's because they give sick people the PCR test to fabricate the statistics, which is bizarre paranoiac thinking, but it doesn't matter, it still results in strong correlation.
What they do know is denying all medical treatment... created a false correlation to drive the pandemic.
...when residents became ill, denied them all medical treatment and administered the PCR to them.
Me: Countries permitted to use HCQ found massive reductions in hospitalization and death rates. Effective treatments were in use around the world but under Fauci's control, we faired much much worse.
YOU: You might want to step back and consider what you're saying.
ME: I might want to step back from reading or responding to your posts at all because I'm unwilling to spend my time editing/qualifying my responses to nonsense queries when I know it's just you I'm posting to, and you just want to waste my time with worthless queries - like suggesting that the PCR test increases correlate to hospitalization/death.
YOU: I know medical professionals who have treated and continue to treat Covid patients. You're not being truthful when you say "they" deny Covid patients all medical treatment and deep down you know it. You're so invested in your fantasy that you're making obviously false claims.
ME: Nationwide there was outcry because suddenly our doctors were not permitted to write prescriptions for effective treatments lilke HCQ and Ivermectin and instead, sick people were told to go home until they needed hospitalizations, but you're prentending just weren't aware of that.
Because I know your queries are insincere trolling, I intially said I wasn't going to repond to you, and you replied:
"You can’t explain why positive PCR tests correlate with hospitalizations and deaths. No wonder you want to move on."
To which I replied, "Am I supposed to endlessly repeat myself until you go to bed, and then tomorrow, go back to endlessly repeating myself when you start posting again? Unlike you, nobody pays me to post."
Sometimes you pretend I haven't answered. Sometimes you play games to distort the obvious and I'm supposed to go correct that and as I lose interest, I spend lest time clarifying and then you jump to claim victory.
So I wasted my time responding today but I'm rethinking that and I'm going to be more selective in those to whom I respond because otherwise people like you will direct the use of my time with worthless assertions like yours.
You're the one who lacks credibility. I'm out there composing and posting large amounts of information re Covid-19 that people can vette for themselves, and some will use to make up their own minds and you're running around ridiculing, taunting and wasting time.
I'd rather have people read your sneering posts implying I'm incapable of responding to you, than actually spend my time refuting your obvious distortions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
