Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: House Atreides
I guess I’m missing it...

No surprise there.

SARS-CoV-2 is the scientific name of the VIRUS that causes the DISEASE COVID-19

Remember how you brilliantly explained that 95% does not equal 100%? In the same school of thought, Cov-2 does not equal Cov-19.

If it did they wouldn't have two different names.

Here's just one line from your link that devestates your argument (I'm into simplicity if possible).

A distinct name is needed for the new coronavirus.

NEW CORONAVIRUS! WHAT?!?!?!

If there is a 'new coronavirus', then there has to be an old one. And guess what, Sherlock. The two are NOT the same.

BLAM.

Its really very simple math. And by that math, the original assertion is correct. The vaccine does not contain the covid 19. Containing the covid 2 is not the same thing, and that should be very easy for you to understand, but somehow for you, it is not. As hard as you try to make it so, covid 2 is not covid 19.

If we work through all that, it adds up to you stupid.

See? Easy peezy math.

You're welcome.


149 posted on 03/25/2021 4:25:26 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]


To: bagster

“As hard as you try to make it so, covid 2 is not covid 19.”
******************************************************
I’m not aware of a DISEASE called COVID-2. So why would I try to say a non-existent COVID-2 disease is the actually existing COVID-19 disease? And therefore I’m not trying to “make it so” as you allege.

You are clearly in “Baffle Them With BS”, blowing smoke mode.


151 posted on 03/25/2021 4:39:58 AM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson