[House Atreides]

“Read your above two paragraphs again (real slow) and see if you can figure out why you’re stupid.”
*******************************************************
I guess I’m missing it but perhaps you can explain. Before YOU explain my stupidity to me, perhaps you can confirm to us dummies that YOU understand that SARS-CoV-2 is the scientific name of the VIRUS that causes the DISEASE COVID-19? You’ll note that, as a courtesy to those who might have been unaware of that FACT, I parenthetically stated that.

Now, where did I contradict myself? Thank you in advance.

And, by the way, here’s a link supporting my assertion that the disease and the virus that causes it have different names:

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30557-2/fulltext

[bagster]

I guess I’m missing it...

No surprise there.

SARS-CoV-2 is the scientific name of the VIRUS that causes the DISEASE COVID-19

Remember how you brilliantly explained that 95% does not equal 100%? In the same school of thought, Cov-2 does not equal Cov-19.

If it did they wouldn't have two different names.

Here's just one line from your link that devestates your argument (I'm into simplicity if possible).

A distinct name is needed for the new coronavirus.

NEW CORONAVIRUS! WHAT?!?!?!

If there is a 'new coronavirus', then there has to be an old one. And guess what, Sherlock. The two are NOT the same.

BLAM.

Its really very simple math. And by that math, the original assertion is correct. The vaccine does not contain the covid 19. Containing the covid 2 is not the same thing, and that should be very easy for you to understand, but somehow for you, it is not. As hard as you try to make it so, covid 2 is not covid 19.

If we work through all that, it adds up to you stupid.

See? Easy peezy math.

You're welcome.