Posted on 03/24/2021 10:34:34 AM PDT by ransomnote
This post is organized to present 4 points to consider, and then a few key questions regarding these considerations, and finally overall observations that together, I believe, demonstrate that the vaccines, and their ‘rushed’ trials are mixtures of fabrications.
Referencing his 30+ years of experience working in the vaccine industry, Dr. Yeadon makes the case that the PRC test renders false positive test results for approximately 90% of tests administered, and that false negatives are also reported. The publication date is 9/20/2020 at which time Dr. Yeadon states that he believes the vaccines will be pulled from the marked within 6 months following introduction.
From the article:
“Because of the high false positive rate and the low prevalence, almost every positive test, a so-called case, identified by Pillar 2 since May of this year has been a FALSE POSITIVE. Not just a few percent. Not a quarter or even a half of the positives are FALSE, but around 90% of them. Put simply, the number of people Mr Hancock sombrely tells us about is an overestimate by a factor of about ten-fold. Earlier in the summer, it was an overestimate by about 20-fold.”
Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics – the Deadly Danger of False Positives
3/22/2021, 10:13:02 AM · by ransomnote · 15 replies
lockdownsceptics.org ^ | September 20, 2020 | Dr Michael Yeadon
In the following article, the author makes the case that the PCR is invalid because it doesn’t identify the Covid-19 virus.
The PCR test identifies manufacturers’ specified strings of molecules (i.e., ‘primer sequenes’) said to be present in the Covid-19 virus.
From the article, “The CDC is using 12 different computer data base "primer" sequences, varying from 17 to 21 nucleotide sequences in a row to look for Covaids, the same sequence found in goats, papayas, river water, motor oil, etc.”
The same small sequence found in goats, papayas, your pyjamas”
“The WHO was using human Chromosome 8 as their test database “primer” sequence to detect Covaids, which was looking for the 18 in a row nucleotide sequence ctccctttgt tgtgttgt, which is found on the 8th out of the 23 pairs of chromosomal trees on all humans.“
https://images.hive.blog/DQmUtVYWuvrdvqvqqe9xwqQtu8QBPbKwJPDhPRTgtNqnXEy/image.png
From the article:
“A so called PCR "test" is NOT a test.
It's Nobel Prize winning inventor, Kary Mullis, himself was furious that it was being used for any such nonsense as it can neither “test” for anything nor prove how much of any detected genetic material is inside anybody, let alone tell anyone if whatever it does detect is the cause of any illness or disease or not.”
PLAGUE OF FEAR 2020 - Part 7 - THE NAIL IN COVID'S COFFIN
3/18/2021, 5:53:41 PM · by ransomnote · 11 replies
hive.blog ^ | Jan 31, 2020 | Steve Falconer, francesleader
https://images.hive.blog/DQmdj7E5B62nrFFJ8JHuDbcTuxEXSx2pEWtXx5eZGG6pKvJ/image.png
For example, the following is excerpted from Moderna’s Phase 3 trial report.
The primary efficacy analysis population (referred to as the Per-Protocol Set), included 28,207 participants who received two doses (at 0 and 1 month) of either Moderna COVID‑19 Vaccine (n=14,134) or placebo (n=14,073), and had a negative baseline SARS‑CoV‑2 status.
The median length of follow up for efficacy for participants in the study was 9 weeks post Dose There were 11 COVID‑19 cases in the Moderna COVID‑19 Vaccine group and 185 cases in the placebo group, with a vaccine efficacy of 94.1% (95% confidence interval of 89.3% to 96.8%).
Cases of COVID‑19, starting 14 days after Dose 2, were defined as symptomatic COVID‑19 requiring positive RT-PCR result and at least two systemic symptoms or one respiratory symptom.
Among all participants in the Per-Protocol Set analysis, which included COVID‑19 cases confirmed by an adjudication committee, no cases of severe COVID‑19 were reported in the Moderna COVID‑19 Vaccine group compared with 30 cases reported in the placebo group (incidence rate 9.138 per 1,000 person-years). One PCR-positive case of severe COVID‑19 in a vaccine recipient was awaiting adjudication at the time of the analysis.”
The following are just a few of the problems with using an invalid test to validate Covid-19 vaccine trials.
“In another promising medical development, the biotechnology company Moderna has announced its COVID-19 vaccine could be up to 94.5% effective.
The news comes a week after Pfizer announced its vaccine could be up to 90% effective based on a similar, early analysis from its Phase 3 trial.”
I think it’s reasonable to assume that vaccine trial participants were give the PCR ‘test’ repeatedly: at the start of the trial, after Dose 1, after Dose 2, and then routinely through the 4 or so weeks of monitoring following to see at what point they might supposedly contract (e.g., subject’s PCR ‘test’ positive 10 days after vaccine administration – too soon for vaccine to protect participant).
I think you can see where I’m going here. For the vaccine trials to be valid, the PCR test had to be valid. However the PCR test is not valid for this use, yet the many PCR ‘supposedly’ administered to 28,207 always tracked reliably to portray consistent, reliable, positive vaccine trial results
College students used to have two specific terms for false experimental data.
“Fudging the data”: After the experiment or study failed to return expected outcomes, the data was ‘modified’ to support the experimental hypothesis.
“Dry lab-ing”: While the experimental design specified in detail exacting laboratory and instrumentation critera, phases, tests etc., no actual lab work occurred (no need to wash out beakers, etc. as no real lab work took place).
I have to wonder just HOW the vaccine companies all came up with their data under the circumstances.
I’ll add one more problem with the scenario involving the development of the Covid mRNA vaccines that has me wondering. I haven’t given it a lot of thought but I believe there is something to it.
Initially I was posting that the mRNA technology upon which the mRNA vaccines were based was discovered in 2005; obtained Emergency Use Authorization and in 15 years since has failed to obtain FDA approval; conducted animal trials in 2005 and 2012 in which all animals (cats) developed anti-bodies and then when exposed to the virus being tested at the time (HIV, Hep C, other Coronaviruses), all animals died (their immune systems over-reacted).
Recently a FReeper has been reporting that there was in fact a successful trials which included "mice, ferrets, monkeys and interim report on human trials 2017" using the same nano mRNA technology underpining the Covid vaccines.
Suppressed Information About the Covid-19 Vaccine' | Vol 01 Date: 03/20/2021 (freerepublic.com)
The sources I had consulted made no mention of trials involving mice that survived. I was going to hunt for that data to see if it was correct, but now that I know the trials are worthless, I won’t bother.
Here’s the problem. The mRNA technology was considered an exciting find in 2005 because it could open the door to T-cell immunity which was otherwise little understood but believed to hold tremendous promise for human health.
The first animal trials took place in 2005 and failed. More work was done and the second round of animal trials was performed in 2012 and again met with failure. The mRNA technology under development for the past 15 years never reached human trials or obtained FDA approval.
If the FReeper is correct that trials involving mice which survived took place in 2017, why didn't the researchers move to begin full-scale trials with that technology? 3 years later that technology was modified for use in Covid-19 vaccines, but it seems like nothing happened with the platform technology until it was selected to for modification serve as the basis for the Covid-19 vaccines.
I wonder if I dig up information on this, might I find that Hillary Clinton was expected to win the 2016 election after which time her administration would have required mandatory vaccinations.
Our enemies want to reduce our population to a tame, manageable size. Just wondering. If you’ve seen the ‘Lock Down” scenarios, it does seem that the New World Order types have been planning their worldwide coup for some time, and one of the analyzed scnearios was a pandemic. And then we had Bill Gate’s symposium in 2019 walking through pandemic scenarios. Fauci funded Wuhan long before Wuhan’s ‘accidental’ release of a virus comprised of human/bat/HIV RNA material.
~~~~~~~~~~~
We’ve been betrayed in all aspects of the Planned-Demic since the engineered China virus was first deployed in Yuhan.
The sick were denied all treatment and told to go home until they needed hospitalization. How many illnesses could be spun into a fake Planned-Demic if the public were denied treatment? How can they claim to have a compassionate dedication to protecting us if they refuse us the right to try FDA approved medications when we’re dying?
HCQ and Ivermectin were FDA approved and in use with good track records for decades. The CDC not only banned the off-label use of these drugs during a time they declared an unprecedented medical emergency, they wouldn’t even award these drugs “Emergency Use Authorization” they would later grant their fake vaccines. They denied dying people the right to assume any risks in a final attempt to survive the illness.
They’ve lied to the public and told us the Covid-19 vaccines are FDA approved. Fauci himself said they were when asked on video. He then went on to craftily equate FDA approval with FDA authorization when he knows the difference.
Fauci is on video stating that asymptomatic spread does not drive epidemics; he’ll say whatever needs to be said to advance the narrative, and if it’s that asymptomic spread is devastating and we all have to shut down the economy, schools, and life stay home, he’s your guy.
45 Second Twitter Video Clip of Dr. Fauci Saying. ".... asympomatic spread is rare and historically not a driver of outbreaks. Symptomatic people drive outbreaks."
(sidenote: Fauci's NIH division collaborated with Pfizer to produce their Covid-19 vaccine and in particular, on those mouse trials.)
In the following video interview excerpt on Twitter, the inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, says Dr. Fauci is a liar and not qualified for the position he holds:
Text of Mullis’ comments:
“Guys like Fauci get up there and start talking, you know, he doesn’t know anything really about anything and I’d say that to his face. Nothing. The man thinks you can take a blood sample and stick it in an electron microscope and if it’s got a virus in there you’ll know it. He doesn’t understand electron microscopy and he doesn’t understand medicine and he should not be in a position like he’s in. Most of those guys up there on the top are just total administrative people and they don’t know anything about what’s going on in the body. You know, those guys have got an agenda, which is not what we would like them to have being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda. They make up their own rules as they go. They change them when they want to. And they smugly, like Tony Fauci does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera,”~ Kary Mullis
Where the Covid-19 vaccines are concerned, we’ve been denied informed consent which is required for us to balance the risks versus the benefits of having the vaccine.
All benefits of the vaccine are exaggerated because the spike protein is not specific to Covid-19; we’ve probably already encountered pathogens that caused our bodies to produce the spike proteins triggered by the vaccine. The benefits of the vaccine are non existant because the vaccine is predicated on fake vaccine trials and false positives etc.
The risks of having the vaccine are deleted, purged, and ridiculed as disinformation. Even as the CDC’s VAERS database shows the Covid vaccines are notably at the top of some key observed ‘event categories’ (ER visits, life threatening reactions, Deaths) out of 93 vaccines in just 2 months into their administration.
Silencing the discussion of risk, and therefore denying us informed consent violates the primary tennent of the Nuremberg Code of 1947.
They’ve lied to lock us down and force us to wear useless masks.
Is anyone still hoping that the tightening noose and assault on our rights and our bodies is suddenly going to stop, or better yet, improve? Is it logical to hope that, after telling us to expect that our lives will never be the same and we must henceforth live from vaccination, to vaccination, a life of masked social distancing, the vaccines will actually be a product of their (non existent) integrity and good will or that the vaccines will be worse than all measures leading up to it?
They want to hurt us, to kill us. They still won't allow us to use safe, FDA approved treatments for Covid, insisting we die without it instead in order to drive us to the vaccines. Is that not the obvious conclusion of the unending series of lies driving us like livestock through a maze of narrowing chutes toward enslavement and mandatory vaccinations?
There is a reason they made these 2 shot vaccines; and a reason why they were talking about the possible need for a 3rd or more booster shot(s) even before they released the vaccines to the public.
Brilliant thesis, Professor. Has it been peer reviewed?
I see a Nobel in your future.
p.s.
How can I go back to my basement if I'm already there? You speak in riddles.
p.p.s.
I have no desire to see this fabricated, nonsensical garbage every day.
#GoBackToSleepGrampy
Pfizer found 9 out of 21,500 severes. Minuscule.
There were 14k people in each arm of the Moderna study. In the 9 weeks following vaccination 185 of those getting the placebo contracted symptomatic Covid vs 11 in the vaccine group, and the severe count was 30-0.
You can wave you hands and say statistical noise but that's not a very convincing argument.
Artemis Webb wrote: “You are wasting your breath. Conspiracy theorist will believe what they wish to believe and if you make a focused effort to convince them that they are wrong they pivot to, “Who are you working for?””
That’s so true. They’re so convinced that they, and only they, are privy to the ‘real truth’ so everyone else is either stupid or paid or both.
Over 500,000 dead.
bagster wrote: “And who told you that?”
Did you learn differently watching youtube videos?
I did. Gotta get info from somewhere, and derp fake news is right out, these days.
I learned that CDC and Who are big, fat liars.
Where do you get your info? MSNBC?
You know they are prone to lying too, right?
p.s. Your side has motive to lie. My side has none.
But you go with derp state numbers, Sheepy McSheeppants.
I didn’t wave my hand, I just said it could be viewed as noise. How balanced were the two arms relative to age or other risk factors? I am sure the data is out there and with this sample size it should be well balanced by randomization. But it’s another potential factor.
I was chatting with BeauBo about this last week - something close to 40% of people over 80 show zero immune response from vaccines in general, including these. I am told that this is normal for that age group but it’s also a little disturbing considering that the elderly are the most at-risk population from the virus.
You said it, I didn't.
But just to clarify, only a handful are paid. The rest are stupid for free.
#WhatsInYourWallet
Pfizer lies like Fauci.
185 to 11? Out of 14,000?
Come on, bro.
And they both lie like a Clinton, or an Obama, or a Biden, or hell, any democrat.
bagster wrote: “I did. Gotta get info from somewhere, and derp fake news is right out, these days. I learned that CDC and Who are big, fat liars.”
Information that is false and misleading is worse than no information.
bagster wrote: “There do you get your info? MSNBC?”
I only watch MSNBC on election nights to watch them cry.
bagster wrote: “p.s. Your side has motive to lie. My side has none.”
Don’t kid yourself. Those posting videos on youtube disparaging the vaccines have motives of their own. Try researching the psychology of conspiracy theorists and cults.
One motivation is to pretend that you know something no one else does. You’re a good example.
“Over 500,000 dead.”
You left off the “who would be alive today” part.
I assume you and CNN, MSNBC, ZuckFace, HoChiJack, et al., have certified these numbers (like the election)?
From what I've read and from talking to our son, who works in an ER, here's what I've picked up:
There are a lot of very good clinicians worldwide who observe patients, try new things, and talk to each other. Treatments have improved along with our understanding of the disease. One key learning is that this disease has distinct phases, and that the treatment has to correspond to the phase. Timing is critical. Not all patients progress through all phases. For patients in early stages of the disease, there are anti-viral treatments and immune supports that can slow down viral replication and help patients fight the virus. If they progress to a more inflammatory and damaging phase of the disease, steroids are called for to dampen the excessive response.
We heard a lot about ventilators early on. People who got very sick weren't getting enough oxygen. Many never got off the ventilators alive. Clinicians realized that many patients had 'silent hypoxia' where the mechanics of breathing seemed to be working but they weren't getting enough oxygen. There was a vascular issue and oxygen absorption was impaired at capillary level. Ventilators, if improperly adjusted, could do more damage to lung tissue by forcing air into the lungs. Doctors began to favor less forceful means such as oxygen via nasal canula and positioning strategies. It was recognized that clotting was a problem for many patients, so anti-coagulants were added to the regimen.
A lot of good clinical work has been happening, attacking this with existing tools one symptom at a time. There are a lot of unsung heroes.
Well, we can stop quibbling about the clinical trial designs. The real world is about to intrude and it's solidly backing the results of the trials.
Israel Data Show Real-World Efficacy with Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine
"Of the 1,163,534 vaccinated individuals eligible for the trial, 596,618 were matched to unvaccinated controls...Investigators reported vaccine efficacy outcomes versus placebo at 3 different time points:
14-20 days after first dose 21-27 days after first dose 7 days after second dose to end of follow-up
At 14-20 days, documented SARS-CoV-2 infection risk reduction was 46% among vaccinated persons. At 21-27 days, risk reduction reached 60%. At 7 days after second dose and beyond, risk reduction was 92%.
Symptomatic COVID-19 illness risk reduction was 57%, 66%, and 94% at the observed time points. Hospitalization risk reduction was 74%, 78%, and 87%, respectively. Severe disease risk reduction was 62%, 80%, and 92%, respectively. Risk of death reduced 72% and 84% at the respective times after first dose, and was not calculable after 7 days post-second dose."
Which is what you get. False information.
I only watch MSNBC on election nights to watch them cry.
In this, you are wise, wise. However, you get your misinformation from somewhere. I suspect your sources are deep state media outlets. You don't seem bright enough to do your own research like Ransomnote, the thread author does.
Don’t kid yourself. Those posting videos on youtube disparaging the vaccines have motives of their own. Try researching the psychology of conspiracy theorists and cults.
I don't need to research the psychology of so-called 'conspiracy theorists' and cults, as I have a PHD in Human Behavior and Psychology from the University of Life.
Here's the thing. These 'conspiracy theorists', as you call them, are trained and highly educated experts on the subject from places like Harvard, MIT, and Cambridge. Are you telling me that these people are all 'conspiracy theorists'? Or are they cultists? Or both.
Did your dad accidently slam your head in the car door when you were a kid?
One motivation is to pretend that you know something no one else does. You’re a good example.
And then there's you. Folding into the herd and repeating what you're told to repeat.
I worked in Pharma for 38+ years.
The premise that anyone in manufacturing, quality and product development, medical and regulatory/ legal departments would knowingly create, approve and submit false data is an insult to the real people who do the work.
I know folks at Pfizer, worked with many of them for over twenty years.
We never cheated, lied or stole...
Because, our own families might be getting the drug products.
“...We refuse to be gaslighted by false statistics and fear mongering. We refuse to be herded into an experimental vaccine. We refuse to be browbeat by any virtue signaling people like yourself who are willingly ignorant of the global scam that is being perpetrated against free citizens.
Your faith in Government and Big Pharma is admirable, but our faith is in God Given logic, fact, and skepticism. Not in Fauci or Gates....”
****************************************************************
Jeez, you say you “refuse to be gaslighted by false statistics and fear mongering” yet you simply accept ANYTHING that agrees with your opinion. This thread is a prime example.
In this thread ransomnote advances his premise that the vaccine makers used falsified data in their clinical trials. He “supports” this ridiculous premise with a voluminous verbal vomitus dump to start his thread.
But when ransomnote is asked a simple question about the DOUBLE-BLIND CLINICAL TRIALS (you know, none of the trial participants, folks administering the dose injections or collectors of data knew who received the placebo and who received the actual vaccine) he avoids answering. The question I asked was:
“Your HYPERACTIVE ANTI-VAX JIHAD continues. So the vaccine trials used FAKE test results? So how did they know when to use false positive test results and show 95% difference between the trial participants who RECEIVED THE VACCINE VERSUS THOSE WHO RECEIVED THE PLACEBO?”
So, can either of you answer that simple question regarding the purported use of false data in the BLIND TRIAL? Buehler, Buehler?
And, by the way, assuming that we FReepers who believe in TRUMP’S VACCINES also agree with the endless business closures, lockdowns, school closures, mask mandates, etc., etc., is an insult.
Yes it is an insult. And?
Did you know everyone that worked at Pfizer, all the way to the top and across all international boundries? The people that set policy? Dispersed funds? Approved research?
Your anecdotal statement is evidence of nothing, other than a personal observation of your immediate environment. But your loyalty is noted, company man.
The fact is, you have no idea of all the shenanigans Pfizer has been up to over the years. You were a cog.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
