Posted on 01/04/2021 7:12:28 AM PST by Onthebrink
(Note: Paywall is harish)
Pennsylvania election data shows that over 432,000 votes were removed from President Donald Trump during the November election, data scientists say.
According to an analysis by the Data Integrity Group, obtained exclusively by The Epoch Times, votes for Trump—from both Election Day and mail-in ballots—were removed from the totals in at least 15 counties.
Time-series election data shows Trump’s votes decrementing in various counties at numerous time points instead of increasing as would be expected under normal circumstances.
The group said that Election Day vote removals happened during the vote tabulation process in at least 15 counties, including Lehigh County, Chester County, Allegheny County, Armstrong County, Westmoreland County, Northhampton County, Delaware County, Montgomery County, Lackawanna County, Dauphin County, Pike County, Carbon County, Washington County, Erie County, and Luzerne County.
(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...
Anarchy at work.
“No Standing!” - The Supreme Court
We need solid evidence by now that can hold up in the court of law, not everyone’s favorite theory, we should beyond that step
Bump
I’d like the Secretary of State to explain to people the proper mechanism, and justification, for why a large quantity of votes (thousands of votes, at multiple times) would be subtracted from a candidate’s total on election night. Shouldn’t their vote total be entirely cumulative? Please explain what would justify any elimination of votes, or use of negative votes. Because it sure smells like fraud. Unless the Secretary of State has some other, rational, explanation.
If I take a vote from a purely imaginary voter, square it and add to the total, the total decreases. This is because the square of a pure imaginary is a negative number.
You have to prove it. Hard evidence or it’s just a rumor.
I believe the only way that a vote total should ever “decrease” for a candidate is if there was a mistake in tabulating the vote. This should be accompanied by a statement that on this date election officials erroneously double counted a batch of votes for candidate X.
Absent such an explanation and transparency about the mistake, I do not see how such a subtraction can occur. I definitely do not see how such a subtraction can occur in multiple counties. Can anyone compare these subtractions with prior election tallies? I bet there are far fewer examples from previous elections.
Where is the paper trail for this “subtraction”? The law requires record keeping for any election so there are either uncounted Trump votes in the boxes they will not allow an examination of or there is a pile of discarded Trump votes somewhere. Neither option inspires much confidence does it? Everything about this election appears incredible.
You need to look a little beyond the MSM. There is more “solid evidence” of election fraud than there is that the sun will rise again tomorrow morning.
But we also need a court that’s willing to even look at the evidence. In one case replete with 266 pages of evidence, the suit was filed at 6:00 p.m. and dismissed at 9:00 a.m. the following day. Judge clearly woke up and dismissed the case without looking at a single page.
I have yet to hear any plausible explanation for decrements in machine-to-machine data transfers.
We should have offered more misery to our judges than the Democrats did. They weren’t afraid of us at all. Sort of how the Left has no fear of God at all. Both will learn of their error.
Per the Georgia tabulation analysis (which found these same irregularities), there should be NO human error involved as the data is transferred from machine to machine to machine. No one is sitting in front of an Excel spreadsheet copying and pasting official data. That concept is absurd.
The entire election is absurd.
“Where is the paper trail for this “subtraction”?”
This is what I am not understanding. Why do we need data anylists and statistical studies, etc to prove this. Seems to me if this is true, there should be an actual hard visual evidence of this. There should be an actual record of the votes being deducted. Something does not compute.
I believe they are 1) destroying the paper trail, which is a felony akin to what Hillary Clinton did with her private email server (public records laws) and 2) refusing to allow access to the physical ballots, which is again in violation of the law.
This is why in each of these contested states they are stonewalling and refusing to allow access to the physical ballots.
The Elections Act states at the beginning that elections must be transparent to be trusted..... do you see transparency in this election?
Can you imagine the media coverage if this were reversed and Biden was the victim of fraud? It’s the law. State and federal election laws require physical ballots to be retained for a long time so that the public can have access to the ballots and records of every election to insure election integrity. The media, democrats, and republicrats would be equally outraged.
Once again, the “elites” and their useful dupes (election officials and media) are refusing transparency when it harms their cause.
We even have election officials who have refused court orders! Where is the rule of law? The elites simply ignore the law if the target is Trump. It is stunning when you think about it and there are long-term ramifications for this that people do not understand. It’s ugly.
Can’t prove anything if the courts won’t allow you in aka run out the clock.
They could give Joementia 100% of the Vote and nothing would happen.
I wonder of the Government will beat anyone who is not sufficiently happy when Joementia and his Anchor Baby Bolshevik running Mate are sworn in?
That is the point
We need to agree on what that solid evidence is
Not everyone’s favorite theory
We need to be beyond that point
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.