Posted on 11/15/2019 6:06:30 AM PST by EyesOfTX
Now the Democrats’ handy poll-tested and focus-grouped word is “bribery.” – “Quid pro quo” never did work: It was too clumsy and all in Latin and stuff. And nobody was buying “obstruction of congress,” which is not even a real thing. So, San Fran Nan and Bug-eyes Schiff got their pollsters out on the job making calls and convened some focus groups to find them a handy new word to describe exactly what it is they’re accusing the President of the United States of doing.
This is how the Democrats really do this stuff, folks. No kidding. Everything they do, every word San Fran Nan utters in public, is based on data from polls and focus groups. They literally never do anything real anymore – haven’t for about 27 years now, in fact, since the Clintons rose to power.
The problem for them, though, is that polling and focus-grouping is a fool’s game, the most completely inexact science this side of global warming. You would think they might have learned that lesson back in 2016, when they had to eat the cost of all those pre-planned Hillary Clinton victory parties that all the polls and focus groups told them to go ahead and pay for.
But here they are, still buying in to their failed process, even after the implosion of “Russia collusion” and “obstruction of justice” and the Stormy Daniels payoff and all the myriad smears of Brett Kavanaugh and every other poll-and-focus-group-tested tactic they’ve deployed over the past four years.
Armed with her latest poll and focus group data, San Fran Nan put on her red dress and held another stammering, doddering presser at the capital last night, during which she revealed her fancy new word: “Bribery.”
Here’s a clip:
CBS News ✔ @CBSNews House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told @nancycordes that President Trump committed "bribery,” an impeachable offense, in his dealings with the president of Ukraine https://cbsn.ws/2ObJcoN
Embedded video 98 4:00 PM - Nov 14, 2019 Twitter Ads info and privacy 93 people are talking about this Yes, friends, now we are supposed to believe that Donald Trump, on that July 25 call – the transcript of which we have all had the ability to actually read for ourselves for the last 6 weeks – actually “bribed” Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky. Never mind that that literally is nowhere to be found or even remotely implied in the transcript of that call – San Fran Nan and her little pathologically-lying toady Adam Schiff say it’s bribery, so hey, it’s bribery. Plus, they have a parade of non-witnesses who are, like Bill Taylor and dapper dandy George Kent, going to testify about their third-and-fourth-hand hearsay gossip to back up the Democrats’ latest big, meaningless word.
You want to know who really did commit real, actual, by-the-book bribery of Ukrainian officials? Joe Biden. You don’t have to believe me, you can watch him brag about outright, unabashed bribery with $1 billion of American taxpayer money right here:
That’s real, true, unabashed bribery, committed by a sitting Vice President in order to protect his ne’er-do-well son, Hunter, who was getting massive payoffs by an utterly corrupt Ukrainian natural gas company called Burisma.
This, of course, is the Democrats’ favorite Saul Alinsky tactic of “projection” – accusing your enemies of doing all the bad things you in fact have done. It’s despicable, it’s demented, it’s disgusting. But hey, these are Democrats we’re talking about here. Did you really expect anything else?
That is all.
One big problem for the Dems:
Trump does Alinsky better than they do . . .
when san fran nan was talking about truman, i really thought she was confused that he was still president...
And..?
Bribery; but giving know-nothing, do-nothing, deadbeat sons of Biden, Pelosi, Kerry high paying jobs and paying off dem politicians and doing their bidding ISN'T!
So I guess it was bribery back in 1945 when we told the Japanese and Germans to surrender and we’ll stop kicking their butts...
Never thought about it. Your right!
Perhaps I’m wrong, but I think that the Constitutional justification of ‘bribery’ for an impeachment was the idea of a President taking bribes, i.e. the President being the ‘bribee’ not the ‘briber’—which is and has been since the beginning of time a problem for those who have any power whatsoever.
Congress authorizes the transfer of $X to Ukraine. Someone is committing “bribery” if they tell Ukraine they might NOT get it?
I wish this kind of “bribery” would happen all the time with public officials using taxpayer money.
Sshh! It doesn’t matter if they invert the meaning. As long as they can convince enough idiots, that’s all that matters
I’ve been saying for days that Trump has confused the hell out of Washington DC. They can’t figure out how to deal with someone in public office who “bribes” people by threatening to SAVE the taxpayers a lot of money.
“Someone is committing “bribery” if they tell Ukraine they might NOT get it?”
Like...um...what’s a good example here...Joe Biden?
POTUS was never bribed, how dumb.
Trump should sue her for slander.
You are CORRECT sir!
Bribery is the only way this gets to Nadler. Without it, there is no reason to move forward.
New day, new narrative, same old lies.
Today’s democrat politician and their media shills are nothing if not despicably predictable.
In a just and sane world no leftist would be allowed to run for office and we would have a fool-proof lie detector to makes sure.
The one billion dollars needs to be returned to U.S. taxpayers.
Bribery; but giving know-nothing, do-nothing, deadbeat sons of Biden, Pelosi, Kerry high paying jobs and paying off dem politicians and doing their bidding ISN’T!”””
Funny how much American taxpayer $$$$ flows to countries as “AID” & how much of that same American taxpayer $$$ ends up in the hands of Dem politicians and/or their offspring.
How much RICO law could be applied to this behavior.???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.