Perhaps I’m wrong, but I think that the Constitutional justification of ‘bribery’ for an impeachment was the idea of a President taking bribes, i.e. the President being the ‘bribee’ not the ‘briber’—which is and has been since the beginning of time a problem for those who have any power whatsoever.
Sshh! It doesn’t matter if they invert the meaning. As long as they can convince enough idiots, that’s all that matters
I’ve been saying for days that Trump has confused the hell out of Washington DC. They can’t figure out how to deal with someone in public office who “bribes” people by threatening to SAVE the taxpayers a lot of money.
You are CORRECT sir!