Posted on 07/10/2019 4:45:59 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I am perennially asked whether I do or do not believe in autism. I suspect that on most occasions, its a test. Nonetheless, its a fair question that usually takes this form: I know you dont believe in ADHD; but do you believe in autism?
To be clear, it would be absurd of me to deny that there are children plenty of them, relatively speaking who frequently exhibit behaviors associated with the bogus diagnosis of ADHD (attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder). Those kids are problematic, for sure. But no one has ever proven that they have something. Childhood behavior disorders like ADHD are constructs; they are not realities. Leukemia and nearsightedness are realities. The spurious claim that these kids have something biochemical imbalances being the number one have is used to sell various therapies, including drugs that have yet to reliably outperform placebos and involve the very real possibility of dangerous side effects.
But ADHD and classical autism are horses of different colors. I have no way of proving it, but I am convinced that autism in its classical form is a very real, have thing, albeit researchers have yet to discover the nature of its reality. They are handicapped in doing so by the fact that autism is classified as a psychiatric/psychological disorder. What, pray tell, is psychological about a two-month-old baby who doesnt want to be held, doesnt smile, and seems pained by eye contact? What unresolved issue is at work here? The answers to those questions are nothing and none.
(Excerpt) Read more at rosemond.com ...
Interesting stuff.
I think that infection (such as influenza or measles) during pregnancy is also a risk factor for some brain disorders.
I cant help but think that we are selecting for and against certain traits with our use of modern medicine.
For example, premature babies now survive who would have died even 50 years ago, meaning that whatever traits they carry which cause them to be premature are not eliminated from the gene pool. Abortion, on the other hand, is actively removing those whose genetic configurations allow them to override maternal instinct (and what else do those genes being weeded out do?). IVF is allowing infertile couples to reproduce despite genetics that should have prevented it; will the genetic configurations that cause infertility eventually become so prevalent that couples who can reproduce naturally become aberrations?
I wont say that modern medicine is bad, but I wonder what we are doing to the gene pool with some of the practices.
I prefer to think of it as "Attention Surplus Syndrome"(ASS) because you're paying attention to too MANY things, thereby making an ass of yourself...😀
No.
Sad that something like strep throat can leave a lifetime of mental illness.
Of course we look back and blame ourselves - but of course when no symptoms are shown - what else could we have done?
Heh. Never looked at it that way. My current boss is much more understanding than previous ones. So far he has given me plenty of latitude. If it gets to the point where he gets as irritated as past bosses, I’ll try that explanation on him.
Ever heard of Asperger Syndrome? Try to find it in the most recent DSM.
Thanks for the ping!
My pleasure.
Amazing literacy!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.