Posted on 09/16/2018 9:40:39 PM PDT by grey_whiskers
“It’s late; I’m tired; and there’s SO much left to do” *PING*.
Will she even testify under oath?
Did you click the link? All is answered. ;-P
Comic and culture relief *PING*.
Feinstein held off on the letter because if the GOP had a month to investigate this accuser, they would find all sorts of bat$#!t crazy things she has done that would turn her into a joke. I’ll bet there are some stories out there of licentious behavior that the left doesn’t want time to look into.
They will turn into a joke faster than she can imagine. The machine that supports Trump swiftly handled the attacks on him faster than anything I have seen.
Check your link and see what pops up.
Mike Myers • 18 minutes ago
There's a Twitter claim out there that the woman told one of her friends that she (the accuser) had 64 sexual partners between 1th grade and the end of college.
Sounds like the start of a nuts and sluts defense.
I'll take the lady at her word;
she and Kavanaugh and others were at a party in a house where the parents were not present; there was drinking;
and Kavanaugh may have jumped on her.
But she doesn't claim he raped her; she doesn't even claim that he got his hands up her shirt or whatever.
If that's the extend of the event,then I say "So what"? Shouldn't stop Kavanugh's confirmation.
•Reply•Share ›
Show 1 new reply
−
Avatar
Gmama Mike Myers • 15 minutes ago
Back then people didn't just show up at parties.
You had to physically receive a phone call, which means the accuser went with friends.
She claims she had 1 beer, but cannot remember whose house or where the house was.
She didn't tell her friends.
Does anyone remember the last time a teenager kept a secret, especially that a popular, older boy hit on her?
1
•Reply•Share ›
Click the link Preach it, sister!
Anita Hill rides again. Feinstein failed to bring this up in the hearings so it should be ignored.
After jumping around Twitter all night, here’s my opinion. I don’t think the Dems honestly think they will block Cavanaugh, though it would be a bonus for them. I think the Dems think they are launching their 2018, and ultimately 2020 strategy. We all know they have absolutely NOTHING to run on. Now they think they do.
As I bounced around Twitter I repeatedly saw MANY “blue checkmark” Dems parroting the same phrase/message. The phrase is “credible accusation” and the message is that a “credibly accused” serial sexual abuser, is trying to put a “credibly accused” sexual abuser on the SCOTUS. This will result in a SCOTUS that includes TWO “credibly accused” sexual predators (Clarence Thomas).
Already women’s groups are gearing up to march on DC. They are trying to peel women votes off republicans. I know, this is nothing new, but the over-the-top coverage that is going to be on display by the MSM is going to try and frame this thing as irrefutable proof of a gender war.
In addition, this gives every msm outlet cover from any FISA revelations.
I’d say no, but I’m sure you can tune in for her exclusive, recollection of the entire ordeal on MSNBC and CNN.
Bill Clinton was a "credibly accused" serial rapist.
Teddy Kennedy was a "credibly accused" murderer and philanderer.
Made no difference to these RATs.
Can we confirm the bunnyboiler’s age? ‘cause a little birdie said she was something like 12 at the time of the alleged daytime high-school “drinking party” at a stanchly Catholic home at a date she can’t remember (except ‘summer’), an address she couldn’t remember, with people she came with that she can’t remember, or why she was even there, but she remembers exactly the first and last names of two individuals she had never met or been introduced to, that she now accuses, after first accusing four of attacking her. And now she’s a shrink. Are we sure she isn’t related to Roxanne Pallett?
Granted that my data sample is small, but I believe if it were a "staunchly Catholic" home (of some 35 years ago) at which teens were sampling alcohol, I can assure you this would be done under the watchful (though not always obviously present) eye of the mother and father of said household.
And following that, there would be no inappropriate physical contact between these underage members of the opposite sex.
In sum, her story doesn't add up, IMHO.
From where I see it, in Oz, these scumbags don’t give a d+mn how the US is perceived in the rest of the world; floozies and crooked lawyers crawling out of the woodwork like cockroaches. Your politics desperately needs pest-control.
I am totally against this 17-year-old drunk kid being on the Supreme Court. Crazy that Trump even nominated a teenage minor to such a position. Isn’t there a minimum age or something?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.