Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

I'm getting tired of these character assassination floozies.
1 posted on 09/16/2018 9:40:39 PM PDT by grey_whiskers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers; neverdem; SunkenCiv; Cindy; LucyT; decimon; freedumb2003; ...

“It’s late; I’m tired; and there’s SO much left to do” *PING*.


2 posted on 09/16/2018 9:41:42 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

Will she even testify under oath?


3 posted on 09/16/2018 9:42:15 PM PDT by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

Feinstein held off on the letter because if the GOP had a month to investigate this accuser, they would find all sorts of bat$#!t crazy things she has done that would turn her into a joke. I’ll bet there are some stories out there of licentious behavior that the left doesn’t want time to look into.


6 posted on 09/16/2018 10:01:04 PM PDT by LoneRangerMassachusetts (Behind enemy lines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

After jumping around Twitter all night, here’s my opinion. I don’t think the Dems honestly think they will block Cavanaugh, though it would be a bonus for them. I think the Dems think they are launching their 2018, and ultimately 2020 strategy. We all know they have absolutely NOTHING to run on. Now they think they do.

As I bounced around Twitter I repeatedly saw MANY “blue checkmark” Dems parroting the same phrase/message. The phrase is “credible accusation” and the message is that a “credibly accused” serial sexual abuser, is trying to put a “credibly accused” sexual abuser on the SCOTUS. This will result in a SCOTUS that includes TWO “credibly accused” sexual predators (Clarence Thomas).

Already women’s groups are gearing up to march on DC. They are trying to peel women votes off republicans. I know, this is nothing new, but the over-the-top coverage that is going to be on display by the MSM is going to try and frame this thing as irrefutable proof of a gender war.

In addition, this gives every msm outlet cover from any FISA revelations.


12 posted on 09/16/2018 10:22:52 PM PDT by NImerc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

Can we confirm the bunnyboiler’s age? ‘cause a little birdie said she was something like 12 at the time of the alleged daytime high-school “drinking party” at a stanchly Catholic home at a date she can’t remember (except ‘summer’), an address she couldn’t remember, with people she came with that she can’t remember, or why she was even there, but she remembers exactly the first and last names of two individuals she had never met or been introduced to, that she now accuses, after first accusing four of attacking her. And now she’s a shrink. Are we sure she isn’t related to Roxanne Pallett?


16 posted on 09/16/2018 11:04:32 PM PDT by blueplum ( "...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

From where I see it, in Oz, these scumbags don’t give a d+mn how the US is perceived in the rest of the world; floozies and crooked lawyers crawling out of the woodwork like cockroaches. Your politics desperately needs pest-control.


18 posted on 09/16/2018 11:52:55 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair Dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

Try this one.

http://youtu.be/X8A040Mq0kQ


19 posted on 09/17/2018 12:02:06 AM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

I am totally against this 17-year-old drunk kid being on the Supreme Court. Crazy that Trump even nominated a teenage minor to such a position. Isn’t there a minimum age or something?


20 posted on 09/17/2018 12:04:23 AM PDT by Dagnabitt ( No wall. No budget. Shut. It. Down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

Student evaluation of her as a professor posted in 2014

“Prof. Ford is unprofessional, lacks appropriate filters, and I am honestly scared of her. She’s made comments both in class and in e-mails, if you cross her, you will be on her bad side. I fear to think of the poor clients that had to deal with her while she got her MSW and her LCSW. Absolutely the worst teacher I ever had.”


21 posted on 09/17/2018 12:15:10 AM PDT by tired&retired (Blessings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

So she will be questioned by a bunch of useless politicians and we are to expect TRUTH?


31 posted on 09/17/2018 6:18:51 AM PDT by JayAr36 (We have the best government that money can buy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

Is the singer that “comedian” Wolf at the white house correspondents’ dinner?


35 posted on 09/17/2018 7:10:23 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Mozart tells you what it's like to be human. Bach tells you what it's like to be the universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson