Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/28/2017 4:45:07 PM PDT by davikkm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: davikkm

Just curious, why isn’t this misprision of felony?


2 posted on 06/28/2017 4:48:15 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm

Is that a problem? Didn’t think so.


3 posted on 06/28/2017 4:48:42 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Islam: You have to just love a "religion" based on rape and sex slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm

Thanks to Travis McGee for the above.

McCabe in violation of the Hatch Act!


4 posted on 06/28/2017 4:49:02 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Limbaugh: Democratic Party Has Become Largest Hate Group In This Country! Go Trump MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm

Has a Democrat Ever been help responsible for anything?


5 posted on 06/28/2017 4:49:21 PM PDT by heights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm
News Flash....a bear pooped in the woods. Now we return you to our regularly scheduled programming. /s

Damn straight they did. There are several people who need to be prosecuted immediately (like last summer and fall).

6 posted on 06/28/2017 4:49:42 PM PDT by canalabamian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm

I don’t know, the FBI didn’t come back and demand it... Obstruction of justice, but you really need to ask why the fibbies aren’t answering why they didn’t demand or seize.


7 posted on 06/28/2017 4:50:44 PM PDT by ichabod1 (Smoke does not mean fire when someone threw a smoke grenade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm

Any leaks on what Podesta said behind closed doors?


8 posted on 06/28/2017 4:59:36 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm

Broke law? What is the Law?

Seriously, when those bustards are in office, they think they’re impervious (AND, with the RINOs in Congress, who merely wink and shrug, they get pretty far with it).


10 posted on 06/28/2017 5:01:13 PM PDT by Migraine (Diversity is great- -- until it happens to YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm

“...broke the law by denying the FBI access to the server during an investigation...”

If the FBI didn’t inspect the DNC computers how do we know they were actually hacked? With a proven track record of deceit and prevarication, the DNC cannot and must be believed.


12 posted on 06/28/2017 5:03:48 PM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm
Just remember....Hillary said....I wouldn't do it again.

And it doesn't mean a damn thing after the fact.

Kinda like the time Mom caught ya smoking. You swore it was the first time, that you'd never do it again....blah, blah, blah

14 posted on 06/28/2017 5:04:38 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm
Breaking the law and answering for it are two very different things. Especially in DeeCee.

ESPECIALLY, for democrats.

18 posted on 06/28/2017 5:32:25 PM PDT by Baynative ( Someone's going to have to pay for these carbon emissions, so it might as well be you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm
I'm no lawyer but it seems to me any so called proof of Russian intrusion into the DNC server would be considered “tainted” and therefore inadmissible as evidence.
19 posted on 06/28/2017 5:34:52 PM PDT by where's_the_Outrage? (Trump the anti politician. About time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm
The FBI could have obtained a court order to seize the
DNC server if they really wanted to examine it. They didn't.
The entire episode was nothing but pretense on the part of the FBI.
They had no intention of examining the DNC server.
The FBI is still controlled by Obama/Clintons' and their Democrats.
20 posted on 06/28/2017 6:01:31 PM PDT by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm
"John Podesta Meets With House Intelligence Panel Behind Closed Doors"

What's really strange about this is that there hasn't been multiple full text, video and audio leaks like with a Trump official.

22 posted on 06/28/2017 6:20:03 PM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm

So when the FBI comes knocking on my door, I simply tell them they can’t come in. Super, I thought it might have been a problem.


23 posted on 06/28/2017 6:31:03 PM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag (We are getting even more than we voted for!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm
As much as I hate supporting the Dems, I have to ask "what law did they break?"

Did the FBI present a search warrant or subpoena for the DNC servers? Or did they just weakly ask to look? Unless I hear otherwise, I count the FBI request the same as a cop pulling me over and asking if he could look in my car. You want to search? Show me the warrant.

Now, I think it would have been wise for the DNC to use the FBI's help... unless the Dems were doing something illegal with the server.

24 posted on 06/28/2017 7:03:03 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity - Pres. Eisenhower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson