Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kushner to be named 'senior adviser' to Trump: report
The Hill ^ | January 9, 2017 | Mallory Shelbourne

Posted on 01/09/2017 4:52:35 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Lawyers have etched out a plan for President-elect Donald Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, to serve in the new administration, according to a report.

Mike Allen said in his inaugural Axios AM e-letter early Monday that Kushner will serve as senior adviser. Kushner is reportedly now searching for members of his staff.

The New York Times reported last week that Kushner has been pursuing real-estate deal with a company that has close ties to China, all while advising his father-in-law during is bid for the White House.

According to the newspaper, Kushner hired the law firm WilmerHale for consultation on how he could follow ethics laws should he enter the Trump administration.

Just after Trump’s election victory, NBC News reported that the president-elect wanted Kushner to sit in on the daily presidential briefings. A transition official denied at the time that Trump had requested his children receive top security clearances.


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: jaredkushner; kushner; trump; trumpadm; trumpfamily; trumptransition
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 01/09/2017 4:52:35 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Been rumors from way back - interesting they felt compelled to mention his real estate endeavors to date....


2 posted on 01/09/2017 4:55:41 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/thepresidentandcabinet/a/Presidential-Appointments-No-Senate-Required.htm


3 posted on 01/09/2017 5:03:51 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

We’ll just have to trust in Mr. President-Elect’s judgement.

I do.


4 posted on 01/09/2017 5:05:28 AM PST by MichaelCorleone (Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trebb

I don’t trust this guy’s politics, and it’s worth mentioning his real estate endeavors because he’s got a lot of potential conflicts of interest in any administration role.


5 posted on 01/09/2017 5:05:51 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MichaelCorleone

I’d be interested to see how Democrats react to this. If they don’t complain about it the way they’re bleating about all of Trump’s cabinet appointments, I’d say that would be a huge warning flag to me.


6 posted on 01/09/2017 5:08:21 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

So far there are no conflicts of interest for any Trump appointees, because none of them have taken their positions in the administration. (Today being Jan. 9.) Much ado about nothing. What they do at the time they start their jobs is another matter.


7 posted on 01/09/2017 5:09:34 AM PST by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The New York Times reported last week that Kushner has been pursuing real-estate deal with a company that has close ties to China, all while advising his father-in-law during is bid for the White House.

Hey Mallory, get an editor.

8 posted on 01/09/2017 5:12:03 AM PST by upchuck (Obama once thought that he belonged to the ages. Now he belongs in the rubbish bin. h/t D.Greenfield)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Genoa
That's why I said "potential" conflicts of interest.

To me, his biggest "conflict of interest" has nothing to do with conflicts of interest as they are legally defined.

My concern is his politics, first and foremost.

9 posted on 01/09/2017 5:12:17 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

“conflicts of interest”

SO WHAT? You must be thinking of how Democrats operate.


10 posted on 01/09/2017 5:12:21 AM PST by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Is “senior adviser” an official government position, like congressman, senator, etc.?


11 posted on 01/09/2017 5:12:59 AM PST by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faucetman

I know exactly how Democrats operate. Come here to New Jersey, and you’ll see how Kushner’s own father has been a major fundraiser and political supporter for the Democrats who turned this state into a giant sh!t-hole.


12 posted on 01/09/2017 5:14:25 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
It may depend on two things:

1. If he is paid for the role (I imagine he won't be, or he'll be paid a nominal salary of $1 per year).

2. If the role requires security clearances of any kind.

13 posted on 01/09/2017 5:16:29 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
I’d be interested to see how Democrats react to this.

Oh they'll complain. And they'll point to 5 U.S. Code § 3110 which says that the President can't appoint family members to positions in the Executive Branch. Now there is a bit of an out, because the law also says that, " An individual appointed, employed, promoted, or advanced in violation of this section is not entitled to pay, and money may not be paid from the Treasury as pay to an individual so appointed, employed, promoted, or advanced." So theoretically Kushner could agree to serve without pay. But he cannot be reimbursed for any expenses and if he's putting together a staff then it's questionable whether the government would be able to pay them.

14 posted on 01/09/2017 5:17:24 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
...it’s worth mentioning his real estate endeavors because he’s got a lot of potential conflicts of interest in any administration role.

As is true of any successful business person. We're in for 4-8 years of enemedia accusations of conflicts at the presidential level as it is, what's one more?

15 posted on 01/09/2017 5:17:54 AM PST by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

His side of the family are dems. Uncle Murray’s side is republican.


16 posted on 01/09/2017 5:18:49 AM PST by RummyChick (Trump Train Hobo TM Rummychick. Example - Ryan Romney Kasich. Quit trying to Jump on the Train)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Right. I don’t trust any of them. I’ve been around New York City long enough to question the motives of everyone in government — no exceptions.


17 posted on 01/09/2017 5:22:42 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

>>So theoretically Kushner could agree to serve without pay. But he cannot be reimbursed for any expenses and if he’s putting together a staff then it’s questionable whether the government would be able to pay them. <<

They are not direct expenses of his so yes, I am pretty sure they would be paid.


18 posted on 01/09/2017 5:26:22 AM PST by freedumb2003 (obozo: not just the worst president in American history - worst *American* in American history (turf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

I do not like the idea of family in official jobs in the WH. I don’t like the fact of the private security either. The Presidency is not a family business, nor is the President a celebrity with his own personal bodyguards. Any Pres can listen to whomever he wants including family but not in any official capacity.W may well have listened to his dad but he didn’t bring him to WH Intel briefings. The Pres Elect continues to be his own enemy with these decisions.


19 posted on 01/09/2017 5:29:05 AM PST by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
They are not direct expenses of his so yes, I am pretty sure they would be paid.

But they're staff of someone who is technically serving in violation of the law. However, assign them on paper to another part of the executive branch and "lend them out" to Kushner and the problem would be solved.

20 posted on 01/09/2017 5:32:00 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson