Rumors stirring in the NYPD that Huma's emails point to a pedophila ring and @HillaryClinton is (TR)

Twitter ^ | October 30, 2016 | David Goldberg

[HANG THE EXPENSE]

Put nothing past the political class.Would you really be shocked? It sure would explain a lot.

[wiggen]

We all know about Bill and Weiner of course is no stretch of the imagination but Hillary? Nobody thinks the same articles that have appeared for the past few years would have uncovered that?

[NonValueAdded]

Maybe they will fast track enough details to have effect. Because if she wins and this comes out after, we have a Constitutional Crisis the likes of which has never been seen. Conceivably the Electoral College could correct this but Lord knows who would be sworn in as President. A Pardon won’t fix this. The only way out is for sHrillary to have a medical crisis in the next 9 days. Perhaps the Senators will go all Nixon on her and have that same meeting with her. How ironic!

[MEG33]

There’s so much verifiable information already known about Crooked Hillary...These unverifiable rumors are distractions...JMO.

[AndyTheBear]

I certainly want Hillary to lose...but I hope this crap isn’t true...the thought makes my skin crawl.

[Helicondelta]

It’s the job of Hillary supporters to debunk it, not mine. This doesn’t distract me at all. It may distract them.

[stormhill]

It could be a Soros setup

Yes, it could be.
On the other hand, we can't ignore it because it's there, it exists; whether it's a setup or a real phenomenon, it must be dealt with in some way. The question is, should we believe it?

You've heard the saying "when you hear hooves, think horses, not zebras." To what end would George Soros set up such an elaborate drawn out hoax that undermines his candidate? Weiner didn't just pretend to be a pedophile to...what? To present Hillary as a victim of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy? Doubtful when there are no Republican fingerprints anywhere near the scandal.

Until proven otherwise, I'll continue to believe in the plausibility of the rumors.

[sargon]

This Tweet just keeps getting posted and reposted to FR over and over again. If such things are going on, we're going to have to be patient and wait for the evidence to present itself.

We already have plenty of evidence regarding Hillary's corruption, so let's not get ahead of ourselves with such wild speculation. That will permit the Media to shift the focus to what currently can be characterized as "baseless and irresponsible" smears— something we decry when it's done against our preferred candidate.

Let's stay out of the gutter until such time as we're forced to be pulled into it because of evidence.

The Revolution is ON!

Vote Trump!

[kevao]

It’s the job of Hillary supporters to debunk it, not mine.

Exactly. It's out there, and she needs to disprove it. That's how things work now -- refer to Harry Reid and Romney's taxes.

[BigEdLB]

Me too. I just understand that Soros is the most evil person on the political scene today. More evil than Hillary or Quisling Reid. Wouldn’t put ANYTHING past him

[conserv8]

Recently, a loathsome creature approached and stated, “We kill what we can not control.”

Entrapment, blackmail and fear.

There’s a sizable populace amongst women that are not adverse to employing theirs and others’ children to achieve control.

[Fai Mao]

I think this is still speculation.

However, if true then the definition of PIAPS needs to change to Pedophile-In-A-Pant-Suit.

If it is true, it will nor only destroy PIAPS and her husband but could bring down the entire democrat party and a large part of the media. There is no way that the media and DNC didn’t know about this.

There is nothing I would like better than this. I just wish it hadn’t happened on the backs of little girls.

[stormhill]

We agree on Soros.
My question is, why would he inflict a potentially deadly wound on his own creature? After all, this close to the election, it's very likely Hillary can't bounce back from such a devastating scandal.

Soros is evil; he is not stupid.

[kevao]

However, if true then the definition of PIAPS needs to change to Pedophile-In-A-Pant-Suit.

But, even if true, can one prove intent? James Comey really raised the bar last summer.

[Fai Mao]

If they have emails planning a day trip or weekend excursion to the island then they don’t need to prove it. They have a confession.

[kevao]

All Hillary needs to say is, “She said she was 18,” and then Comey gives her a pass on intent.

[stormhill]

But, even if true, can one prove intent?

Why do we accept that intent only needs to be proven when the accused is a liberal?
Dinesh D'Souza served real time in jail on the basis of the oversight of an obscure donation law that didn't benefit him in any way and only added a pittance to his friends failed campaign.

[MacMattico]

I really thought this angle of the story couldn't possibly be true but posted about it on my FB wall with a few comments of my own, adding what was known about Wiener, Clinton and Epstein. I got the typical responses— likes from the friends who I knew would and others telling me how horrible I was to have posted such a thing. Hours later I went to the grocery store and ran into a friend I have known since 8th grade. His brother and I were classmates. I haven't seen his brother in years but was always good friends with him. After the obligatory “Hi, how are you?” He felt the need to tell me in the produce section that his brother loves reading what I post on FB and to never stop, no matter what comments I hear back. He said he had just been in touch with his brother. Now why did this strike me as odd? Well, his brother works for the FBI in DC and has received accommodations for breaking several international sex trafficking rings. I just thought this was really interesting timing to be told what I was told.

[kevao]

Why do we accept that intent only needs to be proven when the accused is a liberal?

I guess you didn't see James Comey's exoneration of Hillary Clinton last July.

[CyberAnt]

This is even more horrible than all the other garbage they have been doing all these years.

And .. wait until people see one of Hillary’s recent ads where she is proclaiming that she’s going to focus most of her time on helping women and children. They better bury that ad right away.