Posted on 08/17/2016 2:13:01 PM PDT by KeyLargo
Feminist Magazine: Bill Clinton Isnt Necessarily A Bad Guy If He Raped Juanita Broaddrick
12:33 PM 08/17/2016
Former President Bill Clinton addresses the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S. July 26, 2016. REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson
An online feminist magazine recently featured an article that excused former President Bill Clintons alleged rape of Juanita Broaddrick.
A Wonkette article titled Lets Talk About Juanita Broaddrick claimed that even if Clinton had raped Broaddrick in 1978 he was running for Arkansas governor at the time it does not necessarily mean hes an evil man.
To sum up, I think Bill Clinton could very well have raped Juanita Broaddrick; that it doesnt make him an evil man, or irredeemable (Im Catholic; were all forgiven, if were sorry, and Broaddrick says Bill Clinton personally called her up to apologize). It doesnt even necessarily make him a bad feminist you know, later, once he stops doing that, the article claimed.
The author also wrote that while she could see Clinton raping Broaddrick back then and viewing it as alpha sex, she could also see a lot of other men of the time doing the same thing.
I can absolutely see Bill Clinton doing this (then, not now) and not even thinking of it as rape, but thinking of it as dominant, alpha sex. I can see a LOT of men doing that during that time period, before we started telling them in the 80s, hey, that is rape, do not do that, the article stated.
She even said that she could see someones grandfather doing the same thing during that time.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Have you been raped? Do you know what you live with the rest of your life? Do you know what it does to your self esteem? Until you have walked those shoes, you should have MORE compassion for people that HAVE!!!
Democrats and Leftist-Progs: The most demonically evil hypocrites on the planet.
I’m pretty sure you misunderstood my post. I have quite a bit of compassion for Broadderick and anyone else that was raped. I was simply defending the posting of this article.
A leftist like this now it will casually dismiss rape if it is for “the cause”. From there it’s only a short walk to justifying the elimination of your political enemies by extermination. After all, it’s for a greater good.
So, when is rape really rape with these liberal nuts?
Is it not rape when a powerful man uses his prestige to convince a woman to drop her guard and think she would be perfectly safe alone with someone in his position and then attacks her.
Or is it only rape if he is a black man from the ghetto?
One law for the elites, another law for the rest of us.
Hitler liked dogs.
Get with it folks....rape is okay if the right people do it.
Yep, that is it! Men just didnt know what rape was until the 80s feminists defined it. Now does she mean rape, or Goldberg’s rape rape?
Was that wrong? Should I not have done that? I tell you, I gotta plead ignorance on this thing, because if anyone had said anything to me at all when I first started here that that sort of thing is frowned upon... you know, cause I've worked in a lot of offices, and I tell you, people do that all the time.
Like MANY other ideologues, logical thinking is not their forte. Just look at the similarities between Robert Backwood (1995) and Bill Clinton (1998) sexual misconduct cases. Now look at the feminist leaders and organizations and their completely DIFFERENT politics on these two cases. The ridiculously misnamed N.O.W. beat the drum to hang Senator Packwood but with Clinton, crickets!
So does Obama..
Post whatever you want, but this is a complete turn off to these women...that's why a lot of women are NOT voting for Hillary...she has no feelings for what her husband put these women through and she has no feelings of what she did to them on top of it...
HarleyLady, you and Mr. Mojo are both esteemed FReepers.
I don’t think Mr. Mojo was in any way condoning the intent of this article.
He was pointing out that the article was posted to illustrate the absolute moral depravity of the ideology of the reprobate left, where they can excuse anything if it promotes their agenda and quest for power.
I think we’re all in agreement that excusing the kind of violence, like the impeached president is renowned to inflict, is bad and wrong and his defenders are guilty of the worst kind of blind denial. He is a rapist. Vile.
God help us. And may God help the victims of this kind of violence. There truly is no justification for the perpetrators of these acts.
Only those who have experienced this personally can really understand. It transcends understanding that people can hold them up as role models. Sick.
FReegards and prayers.
and OJ was a hell of a football player
You still don’t get it. I’m not defending the feminist magazine; I’m defending the posting of the Daily Caller article ABOUT the idiotic article in the feminist mag. Get it now?
Seems you’re the only one on this thread who has a problem with the posted article. Go whine to the mods if you feel that it’s inappropriate for FR.
DailyCaller
Elections
Hillary May Want To Rethink This Tweet
Steve Guest
Media Reporter
3:43 PM 08/17/2016
Hillary Clinton tweeted on Wednesday, When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time.
So in the spirit of that, heres a reminder that she lied to the American public about her emails and smeared rape victims credibility.
In an attempt to criticize Donald Trump and the new CEO of his campaign, Stephen K. Bannon, Clinton tweeted, With just 83 days until Election Day, Trump hired one of the most extreme right-wing voices to run his campaign.
The tweet was accompanied by a graphic with the Maya Angelou quote, When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/17/hillary-may-want-to-rethink-this-tweet/
Clinton seems to think that he is the HOTTEST thing to have
ever come down the pike. As such, he thought it was his
privilege to have LAZY SEX performed ON him while he just
sat there (at the Presidential desk) & lapped it up. It’s
difficult to imagine that he actually expended ANY effort
at all for sexual gratification; difficult but not
impossible to imagaine.
He is an UGLY, UGLY, UGLY man. He and Hitler-y are an
UGLY, UGLY, UGLY, PLUG UGLY, COUPLE OF ASSES!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.