Posted on 05/31/2016 4:14:27 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Radiocarbon dating of a prehistoric archeological site in Florida suggests that 14,550 years ago, hunter-gatherers, possibly accompanied by dogs, butchered or scavenged a mastodon next to a small pond. The findings, based on a four-year study of the Page-Ladson archaeological site in the Aucilla River, about 45 minutes from Tallahassee, Florida, provide a rare glimpse of the earliest human occupation in the southeastern United States, and offer clues to the timing of the disappearance of large animals like the mastodon and camel that roamed the American Southeast during the Late Pleistocene. Additionally, the artifacts at Page-Ladson highlight that much of the earliest record of human habitation of the American Southeast lies submerged and buried in unique depositional settings like those found along the Aucilla River, which passes through Florida on its way to the Gulf of Mexico. This record can only be accessed through underwater investigation, which, if undertaken with precision and care, should reveal a rich and abundant pre-Clovis record for the American Southeast, the authors say.
"This is a big deal," said Florida State University Assistant Professor of Anthropology Jessi Halligan. "There were people here. So how did they live? This has opened up a whole new line of inquiry for us as scientists as we try to understand the settlement of the Americas."
Halligan and her colleagues, including Michael Waters from Texas A&M University and Daniel Fisher from University of Michigan, excavated the site, which is located about 30 feet underwater in a sinkhole in the Aucilla River. The site was named after Buddy Page, a diver who first brought the site to the attention of archaeologists in the 1980s, and the Ladson family, which owns the property.
In the 1980s and 1990s, researchers James Dunbar and David Webb investigated the site and retrieved several stone tools and a mastodon tusk with cut marks from a tool in a layer more than 14,000 years old. However, the findings received little attention because they were considered too old to be real and questionable because they were found underwater.
Waters and Halligan, who is a diver, had maintained an interest in the site and believed that it was worth another look.
Working in near-zero-visibility waters in the murky Aucilla River between 2012 and 2014, divers, including Dunbar, excavated stone tools and bones of extinct animals.
They found a biface—a knife with sharp edges on both sides that is used for cutting and butchering animals—as well as other tools. Daniel Fisher, a vertebrate paleontologist at the University of Michigan also took another look at the mastodon tusk that Dunbar had retrieved during the earlier excavations and found it displayed obvious signs of cutting created to remove the tusk from the skull.
The tusk may have been removed to gain access to edible tissue at its base, Fisher said.
Fisher reassembled and re-examined the tusk and concluded that the original interpretation--that the deep, parallel grooves in the surface of the tusk are cut marks made by humans using stone tools to remove the tusk from the skull—is correct.
"These grooves are clearly the result of human activity and, together with new radiocarbon dates, they indicate that humans were processing a mastodon carcass in what is now the southeastern United States much earlier than was generally accepted," said Fisher.
"Each tusk this size would have had more than 15 pounds of tender, nutritious tissue in its pulp cavity, and that would certainly have been of value," he said.
Fisher has excavated mammoths and mastodons in North America and Siberia and has personal experience with the practicalities of tusk removal. He once removed a tusk from a juvenile woolly mammoth preserved in Siberian permafrost.
That carcass was in a condition similar to a freshly killed animal, he said. Because he needed to avoid unnecessary damage to the specimen, and because he had to improvise methods and tools to get the job done, it took him about eight hours.
"Compared to ancient hunters, I was a novice," Fisher said. "But I quickly learned that the most important thing was disrupting the ligament fibers holding the tusk in place."
Another possible reason to extract a tusk is that ancient humans who lived in this same area are known to have used ivory to make weapons, he added.
"In addition, our work provides strong evidence that early human hunters did not hunt mastodons to extinction as quickly as supporters of the so-called 'Blitzkrieg' hypothesis have argued," Fisher said. "Instead, the evidence from this site shows that humans and megafauna coexisted for at least 2,000 years."
Despite genetic evidence that people were traveling to the Americas before Clovis, the archaeological record of human habitation in the region between 14,000 and 15,000 years ago is sparse. However, the long-held belief that Clovis represented the first people to enter the Americas is being overturned by new evidence from early sites. The Page-Ladson site is one of just a handful of archaeological gold-mines in the Americas harboring evidence of a pre-Clovis occupation – evidence that has been challenged since researchers discovered the site in the 1980s. So Jessi Halligan, Michael Waters and a team of experts returned to Page-Ladson in 2012 to reevaluate the archaeological evidence that lay undisturbed in the river bed. Using the latest radiocarbon dating techniques, the researchers confirmed the ages of the stone artifacts and mastodon remains to about 14,550 years ago. The artifacts tell the story of what was likely the butchering or scavenging of a mastodon next to a pond in a bedrock sinkhole within the Aucilla River. Evidence from Page-Ladson, along with that from other sites like Monte Verde in Chile, shows that people were living in both hemispheres of the Americas at least 14,550 years ago and confirms genetic predictions for the timing of the arrival of humans into the Americas. Moreover, microscopic tracking of Sporormiella (a fungus often found on animal dung) in sediments at the site, along with other evidence from Page-Ladson sediment samples, indicate that hunter-gatherers along the Gulf Coastal Plain in North America likely coexisted with and used large animals for at least 2,000 years before these animals became extinct around 12,600 years ago.
Texas A&M's Waters said the Page-Ladson site has changed dramatically since it was first occupied 14,550 years ago. Millennia of deposition associated with rising water tables tied to sea level rise left the site buried under 15 feet of sediment and submerged.
"Page-Ladson significantly adds to our growing knowledge that people were exploring and settling the Americas between 14,000 and 15,000 years ago," Waters said. "Archaeological evidence from other sites dating to this time period shows us that people were also adapted to living in Texas, Washington, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and South America. Clearly, people were all over the Americas earlier than we thought."
"The new discoveries at Page-Ladson show that people were [also] living in the Gulf Coast area much earlier than believed," said Waters.
Added Halligan: "It's pretty exciting. We thought we knew the answers to how and when we got here, but now the story is changing."
Details of the discovery and research are published in Science Advances, a publication of the AAAS, a nonprofit society.
I guess they had a dog in the hunt.
A friend of mine grew up on a farm near a large spring close to Marianna, Florida.
One day he showed me his collection of arrow heads. I was astounded. There must have been several hundred which he had found on the farm. I suspect that area must have been home to a huge Indian population.
Not hard to see the difference in skull shapes.
Ping
Ping!
The Meadowcroft site, near Pittsburgh, dates back some 19,000 years.
The assumptions and conclusions related to the first Clovis artifacts are built on a fragile framework, but those assertions must be debunked before we can begin to build a new chronology.
In Archaeology, the first who stakes a claim must be dethroned before a new pretender can emerge. This is difficult. All than I can say is that the evidence does not support the accepted scenario. The question is how we confirm the accepted scenario, or when to we turn to one of the alternative?
I believe that current science is completely influenced by political objectives, and therefore any conclusion is colored by unreliable information. Objective conclusion are elusive.
I remember the assertion by a sceptic of the Clovis first hypothesis that most archeologists would get to the layer where Clovis artifacts were found and then stop digging. Apparently a lot of those who kept digging were crackpots and clouded the issue with easily debunked claims of much greater age than the evidence supported e.g. dubious claims of 20,000+ year old tools, were used to justify ignoring better evidence of occupation 13 to 14 thousand years ago.
Thanks 2ndDivisionVet.
Well where else would they retire to?
“American Indians, were NOT the first Americans. Those Caucasian, oval-headed, hunters were the FIRST Americans”
It’s Vikings, Erik the Strong!!!
A few caveats, skull shapes change over time. In this case many thousands of years makes a big difference. Pleistocene human forms don’t exist in modern times.
Take a look at Cro-Magnon man which is considered a proto-european. There are no modern skulls just like that (closest affiliation seems to be modern Africa) but nobody is claiming it’s not a european ancestor. Just like Kennewick Man has a skull not exactly like anything modern (closest affiliation is south east Asia) but his genetics ties him to Native Americans.
“Oriental heads” - that morphology didn’t exist until the Holocene.
Native Americans are intermediary in physical features between Caucasion and East Asian which pretty much fits the genetics the article talks about. The same gene pool produced Holocene populations of Native Americans and Europeans and later East Asians.
Cactus Hill, Virginia and Topper, SC as well. All seem to be on the East coast of North America, just where the glaciers ended and at the most southern limit of sea ice in the Atlantic during the last major glaciation. Sea ice that extended in an arc across the Atlantic to France and Spain.
The sea level was 300 feet lower then, so much more land OFF the US East Coast and France/Spain West coast.
Image humans in France going out to sea to catch seals and fish in skin hide boats, following the sea ice edge... And, either inadvertently or in a storm — reaching the American coast. Perhaps there were even waves of such voyages.
The so called “Native” Americans are going to owe us, bigtime.
OK
How Old are the Pyramids in Egypt? The Pyramids of Mexico and South America? The Mounds all over North America.
The estimates are all over the place!
But... when it comes to Important Stuff!
http://www.documentarywire.com/how-beer-saved-the-world/
Cheers!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
