Posted on 02/18/2016 4:30:47 PM PST by Elderberry
Last week, author James Boice interviewed me for a Salon essay about what would happen if the Second Amendment is repealed. With Justice Scalia gone, the vitality of the constitutional right to keep and bear arms is in doubt. Here are a handful of quotes from the article.
Besides, "if the Second Amendment were repealed tomorrow, very little would actually change right away. Chicago and D.C. might try to reinstitute their handgun ban, but virtually every state constitution carries a provision upholding the right to keep guns," says Josh Blackman, a constitutional law expert at the South Texas College of Law.
Repealists respond that they understand that, but right away is not what they have in mind. Repeal would allow Americans over the ensuing decades, or even century, to write the laws we want with regard to firearms. If we want to regulate them like we do cars, we would be able to.
But we have never repealed one of the Bill of Rights. Could we even do that? Shouldn't those be left alone?
Blackman says there is nothing sacrosanct about them--like any other amendment they are subject to Article V of the Constitution. If we want to repeal one, if the criteria is met, then repeal it we will. But he warns of a slippery slope:
"Once you repeal one Amendment, society normalizes the process of repealing another," he says. "It casts our constitutional liberties as transitory."
...
In fact, I could find no data or example in which repeal of one amendment led to a feeding frenzy upon others, and professor Blackman declined to provide me one. The argument of a slippery slope is an ideological one and not based in fact.
...
Blackman says that repealists would be better off attacking the problem through legislation. Wait for a future Supreme Court that thinks more like John Paul Stevensthan Scalia to overturn Heller. But after decades of seeing the NRA exploiting the indecipherability of the Second Amendment to thwart or neuter every potentially meaningful gun control measure, repealists are all out of faith that legislation can coexist with the provision as is.
Blackman brings up another potential problem: A repeal effort could backfire. Red states would retaliate by proposing an amendment strengthening the right to bear arms--for example, upholding the right of constitutional carry--which in our red meat climate could very well see more support than repeal would.
...
Though Josh Blackman sees repeal as a nonstarter today, he says the future of the effort relies on future Supreme Court decisions. "If the Court one day holds the right to bear arms includes outside the home, that would overturn significant precedent and make repeal much more valuable."
It would definitely be Chaos to the extreme.
Stupid notion.
Nothing. Gun owners would chortle and continue downing shots of whiskey.
They are written in order.
First must be repealed first.
Let them chew on that.
It would never happen
It takes a lot to repeal an amendment
More then just a supreme court, the supreme court is not even part of the process
Nothing really. If they can’t find 11 million illegals how’re they going to find 300 million firearms? Then there’s those boating accidents.
CW-II.
Next question.
They would bleed.
The same question was asked about slavery. just sayin’.
Molon Labe.
Law abiding gun owners would become outlaws.
You would need a constitutional amendment. Though a lefty court might say its defeated but you have 300 + million gun owners who could overrule that.
LOL...well said!
It wouldn’t just be repealed.
An amendment would be proposed and states would vote to create a new amendment overriding the Second.
Oh, and then the revaluation 2.0 would begin.
"When guns are outlawed, only Muslims will own guns."
Oh...we might hear from some quarters the usual, “Not on this hill” or “Rule of law!” Then, nothing will be done and life will go on as usual.
NOTHING.
Geez, does ANYONE remember what Negative Rights are?!
There may be some civil strife. Perhaps five dead Supreme Court justices and a few hundred dead congressmen and senators.
A Constitutional Convention would then take place where future attempts to abridge the right to bear arms would result in loss of citizenship and expulsion from sovereign territory. Liberia would be a suitable destination.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
