Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

9 Things You Should Know About Justice Antonin Scalia (1936–2016)
The Gospel Coalition ^ | 2/13/16 | Joe Carter

Posted on 02/13/2016 5:08:53 PM PST by SoFloFreeper

1. ...Scalia (nicknamed "Nino") was born on March 11, 1936, in Trenton...

2. After graduating from Harvard Scalia worked for a law firm in Cleveland...

3. In 1977 Scalia resumed his academic career at...the University of Chicago Law School (1977–82)...

4. Scalia was the first Italian American to serve on the Supreme Court...

5. Scalia was known for his wit and humor....

6. Scalia subscribed to a judicial philosophy known as "originalism." ...the Constitution should be interpreted in terms of what it meant to those who ratified the Constitution in 1788, and is often contrasted with the Constitution as a "living document" that allows courts to take into account the views of contemporary society....

7. Scalia was an adamant and vocal opponent of "judicial activism," particularly when it was used to circumvent the democratic process on social issues....

8. Prior to his death, Scalia had been the longest-serving justice on the current Supreme Court.

9. Scalia was a devout traditionalist Roman Catholic (one of his sons is a Roman Catholic priest). In an interview in 2013, the New Yorker asked him, "Isn't it terribly frightening to believe in the Devil?" Scalia replied,

You're looking at me as though I'm weird. My God! Are you so out of touch with most of America, most of which believes in the Devil? I mean, Jesus Christ believed in the Devil! It's in the Gospels! You travel in circles that are so, so removed from mainstream America that you are appalled that anybody would believe in the Devil! Most of mankind has believed in the Devil, for all of history. Many more intelligent people than you or me have believed in the Devil.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegospelcoalition.org ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: antoninscalia; legend; scalia; scaliaobit; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: SoFloFreeper
"The Constitution is not a living organism," Scalia said. "It's a legal document, and it says what it says and doesn't say what it doesn't say."

A lot of Freepers don't get the full importance of the bolded part.

RIP, Justice Scalia. You will be dearly missed.

21 posted on 02/13/2016 5:58:11 PM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlizzy

Just heard that the final grandchildren count was 36 as of today!


22 posted on 02/13/2016 6:29:15 PM PST by patlin ("Knowledge is a powerful source that is 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 4Runner

Scalia had a history of heart trouble, so while this comes as a surprise as he didn’t carry it on his shirt sleeve, it did come up one of his interviews over the past couple of years, wish I could remember which one.

And so, no, I do not believe there was any foul play. Scalia served his country with dignity & integrity & God saw to it that Scalia’s death should be with the same dignity & integrity. Shalom


23 posted on 02/13/2016 6:34:44 PM PST by patlin ("Knowledge is a powerful source that is 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
Justice Scalia - the textualist, “The constitution that I interpret and apply is not living, but dead”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTRe5xDLfXw

24 posted on 02/13/2016 6:41:18 PM PST by patlin ("Knowledge is a powerful source that is 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

I loved him

With his death we have lost the country.


25 posted on 02/13/2016 6:50:14 PM PST by KosmicKitty (Liberals claim to want to hear other views, but then are shocked to discover there are other views)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patlin
Justice Scalia - the textualist, "The constitution that I interpret and apply is not living, but dead"

Do you understand that he was referring to originalism, or are you a liberal trying to slander him with a non-contextual quote?

26 posted on 02/13/2016 6:50:31 PM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEKVXK61mew

Scalia’s philosophy of constitutional analysis is called Textualism, which he explains as interpreting the text based on what the words say and what was accepted at the time. For example, on the second amendment, there were limitations on the right to bear arms when the constitution was ratified, so those principles could be used in limiting 2nd amendment rights today. 7-29-12

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ml3Lfp6irpk

On March 5, 2015, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and Professor Bryan A. Garner discussed their book, “Reading Law: Interpretation of Legal Texts.” The book examines the time-honored and sometimes conflicting principles for interpreting constitutional provisions, statutes, and contracts. The discussion drew upon illustrations from a wide array of sources and revealed how the selection of interpretive principles affects the resolution of ambiguity in the law.

There is a difference between originalism & textualism. Thomas is the true originalist, Scalia was the textualist. I have tickets to attend a Scalia lecture on March 9th that I have been looking forward to for the past 3 months & so this came as a rather big blow to me today. So, FYI, don't believe everything you hear in the media, let Scalia tell you himself who he is.

27 posted on 02/13/2016 7:07:03 PM PST by patlin ("Knowledge is a powerful source that is 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

It would be difficult to add anything to the posted article and great posts above. Except, may I add: I’ve admired Scalia all of my adult life. He is irreplaceable and he is a Great American. His passing is a tremendous loss for our County.

God Bless you fellow patriot!


28 posted on 02/13/2016 8:16:28 PM PST by Gunner TLW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

That’s more than the Kenyan knows about him. The nimrod is clueless. Had to read off a handful of his accomplishments off a note card during his little speech earlier tonight.


29 posted on 02/13/2016 8:17:14 PM PST by bgill (CDC site, "We still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patlin
There is a difference between originalism & textualism.

They're both based on the meanings of the time they were written. Textualism only relies more on the interpretation of the actual words used. But the goal of both types of analysis is the same and ultimately still based on both word usage AND cultural analysis of the time.

30 posted on 02/13/2016 8:41:43 PM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

R.I.P.,paisan.


31 posted on 02/14/2016 6:10:19 AM PST by oldsicilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: oldsicilian

:( a great Italian American, a great American!


32 posted on 02/14/2016 8:08:37 AM PST by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

Originalism includes the legislative record when determining the meaning of the text. Scalia did not believe in this, Thomas does.

and so while they both rely on the written text & the meanings of the words at the time they were adopted, originalism goes one step further in bringing the legislative record into that definition.


33 posted on 02/14/2016 9:19:25 AM PST by patlin ("Knowledge is a powerful source that is 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: patlin

Thanks for that detail. It’s hard to unextended how the legislative record could be discarded for interpretation of the text, though, since it’s the most direct record of original intent.


34 posted on 02/14/2016 10:09:18 AM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

bkmk


35 posted on 02/14/2016 10:49:43 PM PST by AllAmericanGirl44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

10. There will be no autopsy. The regime can breathe easier.


36 posted on 02/15/2016 6:30:55 AM PST by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patlin
He believed that if the court mad a bad decision, that once that decision was ingrained into the everyday lives of Americans, it should not be overturned.

For argument's sake, that means he would not have been in favor of overturning Dred Scott?

37 posted on 02/15/2016 6:33:41 AM PST by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson