You tell 'em,Andrew!
Posted on 03/05/2015 9:09:20 AM PST by lbryce
What are the potential consequences for Hillary Clinton for using a personal email account during her time as secretary of state?
On Wednesday, the House Select Committee on Benghazi issued her a subpoena for all communications related to the investigation.
Judge Andrew Napolitano sat down with Martha MacCallum to go over the two potential criminal investigations that the former First Lady could face.
1. The less serious possibility is an investigation similar to what was brought against Gen. David Petraeus, who pleaded guilty this week for keeping classified documents in an unsecured location.
(Excerpt) Read more at insider.foxnews.com ...
“none of her action related to this email scandal were illegal.”
Seriously? They really reported it that way? I know I probably shouldn’t be surprised considering the source but wow, now it’s just out and out lying about what’s going on.
People can only face charges when the justice system actually seeks justice. We have a bunch of godless, lacking-in-any-integrity tyrants in charge.
Fear not. John Bonehead and Trey Gowdy will get to the bottom of it!
(Sarc)
But who will prosecute ?
Who brings the charges?
Demonrats almost never have to pay for their crimes. Al Sharpton, Charlie Rangle, Barney Frank and the list goes on.
No the system is supposed to let liberal politicians do what they want as long as it’s for the good of the people. It’s right there in the constitution—go read it for yourself.
You tell 'em,Andrew!
Left side, I suppose?
Someone knows something and they should stay out of Marcy Park.
I would say her next best bet would be to have another mini stroke.
WHO would charge Hillary?
About friggin time. Some of us on FreeRepublic have been screaming about possible felony charges since this story broke but the media including FOXNews concentrated on the “scandal”
Bush / Clinton 2016! Clinton / Bush 2020! Uniparty Forever!
Pardon my cynicism but BFD! Exempt is the flavor of the new USSA. No one is accountable, no punishment ever.
2. Napolitano said the far more serious charge would be a conspiracy to "conceal documents from government computers," which carries a penalty of three years in jail per document. A conviction on that charge would disqualify her from holding public office again.
Of course, given the number of her enablers in political power today, it's unlikely that it would be used.
I admire Judge Napolitano. But corrupt Democrats are above the law.
US House committee subpoenas Clinton emails on Benghazi
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.