Posted on 02/15/2015 9:08:46 AM PST by Oldpuppymax
Using Agitprop and elements of the Delphi propaganda method (3), lethal Home Owners Associations (HOAs) are moving north out of huge Miami-Fort Lauderdale territories up along Floridas I-95 corridor to take over more and more personal property rights of unsuspecting homeowners in gated, HOA communities. And the effects are not pretty! Resetting the default position. . .exploits the structure of the choice to encourage a more desirable option, says Cass R. Sunstein, author of the book NUDGE. (1) Employed by the Obama Administration as a regulatory czar, it was Sunsteins job to have the American people do what the government wanted them to do, all the while believing it was actually their own idea!
A heuristic is a term applied to getting a student or other type of governmental human unit to do what government wants them to do by programing certain choices involving quick decisions and empirical thought processes rather than theory based decision. Most conservatives should be quite aware of the United Nations inspired Agenda 21, Seven/50 attempts to take over private property of unsuspecting Americans. Choice Architecture, a devastating term developed by Sunstein and co-author Richard Thaler, is defined this way: If you want a person to reach a desirable outcome and you cant change the heuristic shes following, then you have to meddle with the choice architecture, setting up one that when matched with the given heuristic delivers the desirable (for govt) outcome, writes the former Obama czar. (2) Nudging HOA residents along the path of cessation of private property rights plays into big government agendas!
Remnants of Agenda 21 are destroying the peace of neighborhoods and towns in South Florida. All along the coast, citizens and local governments are being traumatized by the All Aboard Florida project that seeks to run at least 32 trains...
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
We did our HOA payments online fifteen days before the due date, and somehow they never managed to get there “on time” and the management company always tried to charge late fees. Our utilities, phone and credit card were paid by the same bank’s online service only ten days ahead and always got credited. Amazing, right?
They are no more a government than a bowling league is a government....what do you want? Anarchy? Without some order, there CAN NOT BE LIBERTY.
You do NOT HAVE TO be under them - if you don’t like them, don’t live in a neighborhood with them. There are plenty of great places to live IN or NOT IN HOAs. You are only under an HOA if you choose to be so, thus it has nothing to do with government, which is NOT optional.
I agree, and for the life of me, I can’t fathom the thinking of some supposedly conservative Freepers either....
I know of another case where an older couple decided to go into an assisted living quarters and found that they wouldn't be able to rent out their property which they desired to retain ownership of for their heirs.
PATHETIC
“and somehow they never managed to get there on time “
—
Now THAT would make me angry.
Really angry.
.
Beyond that, there are very few cases where state law would override HOA governance. In many cases the HOA rules are more restrictive. Some states, for example, require boards of non-profit corporations to meet at least once per year. Your HOA documents may require your board to meet quarterly, or monthly. In that case, the HOA regulations would govern.
I'd be curious to know what issues you were facing in an HOA that were overridden by Maryland law.
What was wrong factually?
A community association is a lame substitute for family history and family ties in an area, but it's some kind of organizing principle.
I don’t know about the issue with the truck (some HOAs may have restrictions on commercial vehicles, which may have nothing to do with the size and type of the vehicle), but I am familiar with a number of cases in my state where HOA rules prohibiting tenants are being overturned in court because they violate state or Federal housing discrimination laws.
“I know of another case where an older couple decided to go into an assisted living quarters and found that they wouldn’t be able to rent out their property which they desired to retain ownership of for their heirs.
PATHETIC
Not so-—the rules for assisted living are quite different than a HOA.
The actual purchase is different.
.
I'm confused, are you referring to me?
no sir, not at all....figuring you agreed with me.....
From The Collaborative International Dictionary of English v.0.48 :
Pristine \Pris"tine\, a. [L. pristinus, akin to prior: cf. F. pristin. See Prior, a.] Belonging to the earliest period or state; original; primitive; primeval; as, the pristine state of innocence; the pristine manners of a people; pristine vigor. [1913 Webster]From WordNet (r) 3.0 (2006) :
pristine adj 1: completely free from dirt or contamination; "pristine mountain snow" 2: immaculately clean and unused; "handed her his pristine white handkerchief"
I assume from your answer that you know where you were off topic - and the factual mistake is that in most jurisdictions the cops will enforce the same kinds of things HOA’s will. There’s only a tiny over lap there. Tiny.
Which brings up another question: do you prefer being harassed by government cops, who you cannot choose not to do business with, or by an HOA that does not force you to live in their neighborhood???????
The conservative answer would be B.
The one that springs to mind is that the HOA-ARC tried to regulate where the satellite dishes could be mounted on the houses, but the owners prevailed, because the location if the dish affected reception. Another is that people succeeded in running low-density home day care (one or two other children besides their own) in spite of the HOA by-laws forbidding home-based businesses.
The HOA did succeed in having a high-density day care put out, but only because it was completely illegal in terms of the state-mandated safety provisions for chlldren, and was being run by renters, who had not secured permission in their lease.
Renters were a real problem altogether -- maybe 8 to 10% of the 150 attached houses. The HOA didn't allow renting for the first 6 years, but when the economy tanked when Obama came into office, people just couldn't sell, and the HOA started allowing it. Now that community is infested with Section 8'ers in the rental units.
location “of” the dish, not “if” the dish....
Bowling leagues don’t attach liens to your real estate.
You need to learn how to use analogy. Bowling leagues, like HOA,s are NOT FORCED on anybody. That’s the analogy....
And most HOA’s do not attach liens. Again, the anecdotal doesn’t change the basic facts. They’re just anecdotes. You’re out of ammo here. Quit firing.
Thanks, I wasn’t sure.........sorry
I'm just speculating here, but in the case of the low-density home care as you've described it, I suspect the owners prevailed against the HOA because the arrangement in question doesn't qualify is a "home-based business" by any objective measure. I'm actually surprised that the HOA even pushed to enforce that provision in an arrangement like that, because it sounds like the HOA rules as they were written could technically prohibit people from even hiring babysitters for their own children.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.