Posted on 02/09/2014 9:26:46 AM PST by Errant
Parenthetical clauses are used throughout scripture to explain how, why, when and where in close proximity to the main subject and verb.
Parentheses in the book of The Revelation explain cause and effect. They tie together the events that happen previously, to the events that transpire subsequently on the prophetic timeline. Unfortunately, parentheses, as a literary devise, come centuries after the actual parenthetical clauses so prevalent in both Hebrew and Greek linguistic constructions. Because of their late arrival into the English language, the parentheticals in the book of The Revelation have never been either deservedly researched or accurately articulated. Now, after more than 40 years in the making, The Chronological Gospels is complete with all of the extensive parenthetical clauses accurately assigned throughout the book of The Revelation.
Now, with its impending fulfillment looming large on the horizon, The Revelation can finally be understood with clarity and lived with integrity. This one feature (the parenthetical clauses in The Revelation) in The Chronological Gospels is worth one thousand times the price of the book itself.
Join Michael Rood for the first of the last four teachings on the very last book of the Bible, “Parenthetically Speaking (Before We Are Saved From the Wrath To Come)”.
Rom 3:20 Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight
Acts 13:39 and through Him everyone who believes is freed from all things, from which you could not be freed through the Law of Moses.
Romans 9:30 What shall we say then? That the Gentiles, which followed not after righteousness, have attained to righteousness, even the righteousness which is of faith.
Do you or do you not deny that we are righteous without the law?
I meant to ping you to 881
I post the “plain, pure words” of scripture which are the words of the Holy Spirit. I also understand who they were addressed to and the difference between the time before Jesus death and resurrection and after the Jews rejected Him and they were temporarily set aside. It’s the “plain, pure words” of the Holy Spirit that have been hidden from your eyes and heart by the reading of the law of Moses.
We have already been declared righteous without the law.
I don't think you know what you are trying to ask CB. You should be asking are you saved by Grace with out the law - no?
I know exactly what I am asking. Are you afraid to answer?
>>You should be asking are you saved by Grace with out the law - no?<<
Then by definition you deny the new covenant.
I'm afraid you either you don't know what you are asking, or you are trying to twist the words in scripture to justify your position that you may sin to make grace more abundant.
Looking back on a previous post to your quote of Acts 13:39, which you failed to bold Btw, it says: and through Him everyone who believes is freed from all things.
You Asked: Do you or do you not deny that we are righteous without the law?
Remember what Yeshua said ALL of the law hangs on? By professing you "believe" and accepting HIM, you are meeting the first of the two and in the process commiting yourself to live a more righteous life thereafter through repentance of your sins, before and forever after.
Of course sinning is failing to keep the commandments. That seems to me to be the part you are having trouble with (i.e., not wanting to have to follow the commandments).
So why don’t you believe and be set free from the law? Then you could stop pushing the fraud Rood.
His name in English is Jesus and you have already denied what scripture says.
Why don't you stick to the discussion at hand instead of running from the realization that you are wrong in your belief that you can be of Yeshua while still living a life of iniquity.
Seriously, do you really believe that's possible?
What utter nonsense. Why do you and the Catholics even try that line? It’s an indication of a lack of the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. Those of us who have been born again and indwelt by the Holy Spirit know the difference. I realize that has gone right over your head but I can do nothing about that.
Really? What do we call someone from Mexico whose name is Jesus? Shall I remind you, they are called he-soos.
Can you not give the same respect to the one whom you call your Lord and Savior? His name is pronounced: Yeshua
It is how his name should be pronounced, regardless of language. But like his b-day, and his resurrection, Satan has caused us to dishonor him through our ignorance. Now however, many are starting to wake up to the realization that we've inherited lies.
This is what the Hebrew Roots movement is about, the search for the truth and to REALLY know who Yeshua Messiah truly is and was, as well as to fully understand what it is he commanded us to do - all above and beyond his gracious gift of life everlasting.
It's not just the Hebrew Roots movement either, many other major religions are also making an effort and push to learn the truth.
2 Thessalonians 2:3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;<<
Did you happen to notice that it doesn’t say there will come a new awakening first? You Roodites along with many others who have found “The Way” are just a small part of the falling away.
We who trully understand scripture are not surprised to see your kind emerge in these last days.
I don't know what church boatbums, cynical bear, or caww attend. So what is it that unifies us? Do you know?
>> “I post the “plain, pure words” of scripture which are the words of the Holy Spirit” <<
.
No you clip a few words out of the chapter to make them support your lies.
The word of God is one word, and it is all in agreement when your interpretation is correct.
If there is a conflict between verses in your interpretation, then it is your interpretation that is wrong.
Correct doctrine yields total harmony of the scriptures.
Your ideas create conflict in every chapter of the New Testament. Your ideas are of your Father the Devil.
There are no conflicts in my interpretation of scripture. It agrees perfectly with itself.
>> If there is a conflict between verses in your interpretation, then it is your interpretation that is wrong.<<
It’s your interpretation that causes conflicts. You have to deny what scripture plainly says to make you belief work. You have been shown over and over again from scripture how your beliefs don’t comport to scripture. Not once have you shown us how ours don’t. >> Your ideas are of your Father the Devil.<<
You have learned for Rood well. That’s the tactic he teaches. It doesn’t work with Holy Spirit filled born again believers however.
2 Thessalonians 2:3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition
Interesting that you should pick one of the verses that strongly disprove your pre-trib rapture.
The falling away is the revealing of the abomination.
There is no “new awakening.” This is the only gospel that Yeshua and his apostles ever preached, and has been followed by his remnant continuously through the past two millennia, wherever they be. Its just that it is growing as more study the scriptures instead of listening to Dispy doodlers and replacementarians.
This is the true work of the Holy Spirit, while your gang are the engine of Satan’s falling away.
Your total lack of understanding or acceptance of the scriptures is Satan’s big Ace in the hole.
Hislop and Totten nailed this back in the early 19th century, when Bibles began to become available to the masses and the remnant began to solidify.
No part of the gospel can be grasped without a solid understanding of the Tanach, which is the scriptures that Yeshua quoted constantly, punctuating his revelations with “it is written.”
If you reject what is written in the scriptures he used, you have rejected him.
.
there is not so much as one chapter in the NT that would be without conflict under you and your Father Satan’s interpretation.
Paul tells us that “doers of the Law will be justified,” but you would have his epistles saying that his law was “hung on the cross.”
Matthew 15 and Matthew 23 make it plain that you and Satan are wrong, and it is the man made religion of the Pharisees that was so hung, and that clear knowledge brings unity and harmony to all of Paul’s and James’ words.
Too bad for you and your Daddy.
.
>> “Do you or do you not deny that we are righteous without the law?” <<
.
Which Law?
Yeshua, Paul, James, and Peter all say that doers of the Torah will be justified.
They also say that doers of the Pharisees law cannot be justified.
I’ll go with them, and call you a deliberate deceiver.
The Law God gave Moses was.
Jesus did not come to die to set us free from something that did not hold us in bondage to death, as His Law handed down at Sinai does.
1 Corinthians 15:56 The sting of death is sin, and the power of sin is the law.
That is true.
Now find us someone who can DO the Law.
ALL of it.
ALL the time.
Without fail.
And there you will find a person justified by the Law.
However, since all have sinned and since if we offend in one point of the Law, we are guilty of it all, them ALL of us are under the curse of death and need redemption through FORGIVENESS, not keeping the Law, because it's too late. We've already broken it.
So our trying to keep the Law is not going to save us because it's too late and we can't keep it anyway.
All the *keeping the Law* proponents are doing is trying to put people back into bondage, just like the Enemy wants.
What has emerged in the last days CB, is a falling away from the Word of the Almighty and of a failure to keep his commandments. One of the results is a false doctrine of grace perversion and prosperity with a fatal belief by many to sit back and wait for a false pre-tribulation rapture to save them.
Of course it will all come to pass just as Yeshua said it would. So what we must do, as good servants, is get the truth out to as many in the world as possible. That's what we are commanded to do along with serving as watchmen on the walls during these times. We do so that others may have the time to wash their garments clean.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.