Posted on 02/09/2014 9:26:46 AM PST by Errant
Parenthetical clauses are used throughout scripture to explain how, why, when and where in close proximity to the main subject and verb.
Parentheses in the book of The Revelation explain cause and effect. They tie together the events that happen previously, to the events that transpire subsequently on the prophetic timeline. Unfortunately, parentheses, as a literary devise, come centuries after the actual parenthetical clauses so prevalent in both Hebrew and Greek linguistic constructions. Because of their late arrival into the English language, the parentheticals in the book of The Revelation have never been either deservedly researched or accurately articulated. Now, after more than 40 years in the making, The Chronological Gospels is complete with all of the extensive parenthetical clauses accurately assigned throughout the book of The Revelation.
Now, with its impending fulfillment looming large on the horizon, The Revelation can finally be understood with clarity and lived with integrity. This one feature (the parenthetical clauses in The Revelation) in The Chronological Gospels is worth one thousand times the price of the book itself.
Join Michael Rood for the first of the last four teachings on the very last book of the Bible, Parenthetically Speaking (Before We Are Saved From the Wrath To Come).
If you don’t understand anything about Torah, why attempt to discuss it critically?
Yeshua declared that Torah would not pass because it is the Father’s total plan for man. If it were to pass away, we would have no hope at all. Yeshua’s birth is a part of Torah, as is his entire ministry, and that of the apostles.
Our salvation is also a part of it, which is why the rehearsal of Yom teruah is important to every believer. Without Yom Teruah we cannot be saved, as that is when we receive our incorruptible bodies.
What part of Torah do you hate?
Oh?
To me it's UNclear.
Could you help me by enumerating them?
What things do you want to take out of his commandments?
Untrue.
Scripture CLEARLY states that names ARE written into the Book of Life BEFORE the 'last trump'.
I don't think CB is a JEW.
We were talking about Acts 15...Not Matthew...And they were talking about the law of Moses, not their oral tradition in Acts 15...And this is a response to the law of Moses...
Act 15:10 Now therefore why tempt ye God, to put a yoke upon the neck of the disciples, which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear?
Looks like we have another resty on our hands.
>> “Could you help me by enumerating them?” <<
.
The ten commandments, and the feasts are the chief commandments that fall into that area. The dietary instructions are also important to live a life free of disease.
In Acts 15, the Pharisees considered their Takanot and Ma’assim to be the “law of Moses.”
Ok; so you don’t want to help.
I am not a JEW.
...”The freedom in Christ is derived from obedience to his Torah”...
No, it’s not......The Old Testament Covenant was never intended ‘to be permanent.....
... Jesus used two examples in a parable to show the new is NOT to be joined with the old”
“No one puts a piece from a new garment on an old one; otherwise the new makes a tear, and also the piece that was taken out of the new does not match the old”...Luke 5:36
“In that He says...”a New Covenant”... He has made the first one obsolete.”........Heb.8:13
Paul describes the Mosaic covenant in 2 Cor.3: 7,11,13:
The HOLY SPIRIT tells us (the law).....is “passing away” and is “abolished” .... in its place we have the “ministry of the Spirit” and “he ministry of righteousness” ...(v. 8,9)
Jesus did not come to destroy the law but to fulfill it.... To have it put aside.... If continued it would become much the worse, even for the purpose for which it was intended.....
.... Jesus did not come to ‘patch up Judaism’,... he came to fulfill it by His life, teaching, death, and resurrection,.. not to patch up the old.
Jesus purpose was expanded beyond Israel, to ALL man kind through His spirit, something that could never be done under the old administration of the law.
“And no one puts new wine into old wineskins; or else the new wine will burst the wineskins and be spilled, and the wineskins will be ruined..... But new wine must be put into new wineskins, and both are preserved.....
.... The old wineskins were stretched out to their limit and any more fermentation would burst them. To try and mix the old (law) with the new (gospel) would destroy both.
You are not saved by Jesus plus Moses, neither is one sanctified by Jesus plus Moses. ......
..... And no one, having drunk old wine, immediately desires new; for he says, The old is better.
Once the wineskin was used and stretched it could not be stretched more, it was useless and a new wineskin was needed.
The Pharisees held on to the old law but those who found Christ to be their all in all found life in the new, they left the old for the new.
You wish to be a part of his bride, do you not? His bride is “the lost sheep of the House of Israel.”
Yeshua said it in Matthew 15:24, and the Prophet Hosea says so too.
Most of the population of the dominant states of the world fall into that group. That is what Jacob prophesied on his death bed. Out of those nations he will call out his remnant.
You’ve gotten so far from the word that there is no point in using up FR’s bandwidth on you.
....” He was the perfect sacrifice whose blood renewed the broken covenant with his bride”....
Israel is not the Bride of Christ....the body of believers are.
>> “You are not saved by Jesus plus Moses, neither is one sanctified by Jesus plus Moses.” <<
.
Have you ever read Deuteronomy 18?
Therein Moses prophesies that another prophet would come that we must listen to, that would preach the same laws. That prophet was of course Yeshua.
The act of 'forgiveness' requires the repentance of the sinner and that 'covering' is Christ, as the only path for the forgiveness of sin.
Rom 4:8 Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin.
Paul penned this, so let us use him as the example. The LORD did not impute upon Paul to stand and hold the coat of Stephen while the religious leaders stoned Stephen. Yet, Paul did 'sin'. And Paul of course repented, it is why he could in a personal way communicate on different levels of understanding what it literally means that the 'law' is not what saves anyone. Paul is in all his writings is also explicit in conveying to the reader that 'grace' does not give license to sin, it is just what is in a flesh body.
This is the 2nd time today I posted this to you...Apparently you don't get it...Or don't want to get it...
Why is it that some people think so highly of themselves they feel like they are entitled?
Which is exactly true...
legalists and Torah Followers... will pick and choose what commands they believe they are to follow...and discard what is uncomfortable for them to do,or believe, is required by God under the Mosaic Law...or the Torah as they see them.
Of course you can see Elsie, just where that type of belief system goes.....it leaves all kinds of room for ANY rules and regulations to be required such as found in Mormonism and other false religions...... That is why there are so many today...
....if they can get people to believe they have 'to do' certain things then they can add or subtract whatever they want...and then twist and abuse scripture to make it sound palatable and fit what they determine will attract the unsuspecting...and call their new religion whatever will attract followers.
One of the attractions to Torah and some of the other far left Messianic type groups is they know Christians want to understand the Jewish History better....so they are easily 'baited' into cults and such by using that for the bait.
You were quick to note that on this thread....but then I figured you would...you've seen more than your share of it time and again!
True Messianic Jews know they have a serious problem with these groups and consistantly have to undo the damage they cause.
Well fortunately I can read. Now the 'big' discussion was really about WHAT??? Acts 15:1 And certain men which came down from Judaea taught the brethren, and said, "Except ye be circumcised after the manner of Moses, ye cannot be saved." ....
Paul was the most educated regarding the 'law of Moses', and that is why God elected Him to explain on different levels what Christ meant when He stated He came NOT to change one jot or tittle of the LAW, but to fulfill. Christ became one and for all time the only perfect BLOOD sacrifice. Circumcision is a 'blood' letting and NOT required for salvation. However, it does not make it a sin, if FOR other purposes a male child is circumcised, as some in the medical community have attempted to end the practice. It is a personal choice but not for purpose of salvation.
The law of abstaining from pollutions of idols, and fornication and things strangled and from 'blood' was still taught. So they were teaching the Ten Commandments.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.