Posted on 03/15/2013 3:51:54 PM PDT by Cold Case Posse Supporter
Lt. Mike Zullo, lead investigator of Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Maricopa County Sheriff Department's Cold Case Posse has been attending CPAC. Carl Gallops has been attending CPAC with Lt. Zullo and has reported what has transpired with their meetings with many high official lawmakers on Capitol Hill about Barack Obama's ineligibility to be President of the United States. At the meetings, lawmakers and VIP's were overwhelmed (shocked) at the evidence they were presented with that proves Obama's birth documents are fraudulent. Listen to the video for their report.
Thanks for the Ping.
I predict Holder will be [or is already] throwing Bro O under the bus. The Contempt of Congress Slap gave him a terrifying ‘inside’ view of impending Life In Jail.
Unlike “Obama”, Eric enjoyed a stable upbringing and maternal devotion. He has the capacity to form meaningful attachments. He and Sharon appear to have a peaceful happy marriage; his daughter appears happy. So you see, he has a lot to lose, were he to be imprisoned.
Though they share ideology, unlike Bro O, Holder is not a gambler. Nor is he reckless like “O”. What’s more, Holder’s apprehension of reality is relatively intact. That’s why he wanted OUT.
Bump for later read ............................................................................................. FRegards
The Selective Service fraud isn't new. Like the issue with Obama's Social Security number (originally assigned to a man born in 1890 from New England), these crimes don't get wide exposure on the left or right.
All the above, and more, has been well documented on FR.
There may have been multiple ‘resets’ of the records over time.
As stated - 1964 is likely when little Barack got his current name. There is a page missing from the divorce papers - likely a BC.
After adoption by Lolo Soetoro is another likely point. And in 1971. Both his legally named birth parents had to be in Hawaii for something in December of 1971. The ‘grand family reunion’. Why? What happened there? SOMETHING happened that affected little Barack’s paperwork - again.
To terminate his likely Indonesian citizenship was father Obama needed to claim his namesake child and terminate the adoption and the ties to Indonesia? If so, Obama would have been at that point - KENYAN. 100%
Was his guardianship then transferred to the Dunhams? Probably since both mother and father were foreign nationals in the eyes of the US government and both were domiciled in foreign countries. So who has legal guardianship of 10 year old Barack? Where is the paperwork that states that?
Lots of questions from 1971 that are just plainly dodged - by everyone.
Thanx
The Immigration and Naturalization Service Officer who reviewed Obama Senior’s application for an extended stay on August 31, 1961 wrote that Senior had a US citizen wife (USC) and a son born on 8/4/61 in Honolulu named Barack Obama, II.
http://www.wnd.com/files/2012/07/INS-6.jpg
So at least three weeks after his alleged birth, he was known as Barack Obama, II.
If and I repeat IF he was born in Honolulu on August 4, 1961, those other questions are interesting and enquiring minds would like to know, but they have no bearing on Article 2/Section 1 eligibility. We’ve had adopted presidents before with different birth names (Leslie Lynch King and William Jefferson Blythe) and minors can’t lose US citizenship through the actions of their parents or guardians.
I apologize for my not nice attitude to you.
I’ve just seen so much defeatism and that is part of the problem.
Thus my tagline.
Hoping some of the people whose JOB it is to uphold the Constitution will do so.
That’s all well and good; however, there’s enough recent, circumstantial evidence pointing to a Kenyan birth that the topic deserves a thorough investigation. Obama’s own publisher was claiming Kenyan birth for Obama up until he started his Presidential run!
Clearly, Barack Obama either was born in Kenya and lied about being born in Hawaii, or he was born in Hawaii but lied and said he born in Kenya. I believe it is the latter, but the truth needs to come out, whichever way it may go.
I am not sure the authenticity of that memo. Any handwritten memos that ‘collaborate’ the narrative are suspect as it is known that all FOIA requests are going through WH reviewers who are tasked with supporting the narrative and updating information in FOIA request before they go out.
But anything is possible at this point.
When it comes to what they themselves term "The Obama Narrative" there IS no authenticity. Every so-called FOIA release is fraudulent. They laughed and laughed when We The People invested our precious lives into analyzing, discussing, trying to make sense of the demonic, dastardly synthetic life narrative presented to us as "BHO II".
They aren't laughing now.
The only way we investigators came to his Truth was to step out of their web of deceit, pray, and follow God's guidance.
Truth began to emerge.
How did they respond? They flooded the internet with several additional paternity "narratives' to elicit even more confusion! The strategy: keep them running, searching, crazy with overwhelm. Where was he really born?! Who was his real father?! Was his mother really promiscuous?!
Ooo la la. Keep us enmeshed in the drama. Run the "Obama" Lie like a cheap tv drama. You see?
Despite their concerted deceit, The Holy Spirit stunned them. He worked through a group of us, revealing aka Obama's Truth. Arrogant atheists that they are, they still can't figure out how we know what we know.
How convenient, that the NSO just happened to include the baby’s full name, Barack Obama, II. What, no middle name? Just BO2? Too much info & not enough at the same time; quite a feat.
Odd, isn’t it, that BHO Sr. didn’t know how to spell his own name. His name was ‘Barrack’, two ‘r’s. But his namesake child, ‘BHOII’, has only one ‘r’. Hate to break it, but this makes the baby [supposing all this is true and accurate] Barack Hussein Obama The First. Can’t be ‘The Second’ unless the name is the same; even clueless people know that.
Notice, too, that IF this record is the original and untampered form, we must now decide which of two pathological liars was telling the truth. BHO Sr wanted to stay in HI. If Granny Dunham had already registered Little Barry’s birth as occurring on Honolulu, it would certainly be in BHO Sr’s best interest to further the narrative. BUT, that does not explain the missing wk of foreign arrivals in the National Archive record, that just happens—purely coincidentally, no doubt—to include Aug 4, ‘61. If the birth happened in HI & all was standard & aboveboard, why the need to expunge a wk of National Archive records PRIOR to Zullo having a look at it??? Something is not adding up.
So BHO Sr had a reason to support Granny Dunham’s paperwork, but what reason had BHO ‘II’ to lie to his own literary agency??? He must have known that if he were really born in HI, the truth would come out. Why taint himself w his own publishers as such a liar that he couldn’t tell the truth about the place of his birth?
Well maybe for once BHO ‘II’ was telling the truth. Maybe at that point in his life he was too proud of his Kenyan birth to keep it under wraps. Ayers hadn’t yet smacked him around on the subject, and certainly BHO ‘II’ wasn’t educated enough to know he was blowing his POTUS chances. Odds are he proudly told a truth he cherished...only later to be witch-slapped by Ayers and forced to revert to the lie/manufactured HI birth.
Seen likelier than positing that BHO Sr didn’t even know how to spell his own name, doesn’t it?
Throw a third possibility in there maybe he was born in Canada and lied about Kenya and Hawaii when it suited him.
:0
I stand corrected. The divorce was in 1964.
Your story is fascinating. I have heard mention of a Canada connection with reports of birth listings for August of 1961. That is an interesting thing to explore.
Actually - the man who presents as “BHOII” was born in New York City, 28 Oct 1959, to a teenager named Jo Ann Newman, and her married lover Malcolm X.
Ask him.
OK if its a theory, say it’s a THEORY.
If its not, then...
I would REALLY like to see some kind of proof on it.
A suggestion:
If there isnt direct postable PROOF....
Do FOIA requests for the people involved, for the years that would be of interest.
Then Post results of those FOIA requests.
Absolutely ESSENTIAL.
Well, I have yet to see anything in print saying that he was born in Canada. I have, however, seen plenty about him and Kenya.
Jack Cashill was the first place that I read of a possible connection of SAD to Canada.
He has a nose for this type of thing. I like his logic, the simplest explanation is generally the most likely.
What I wrote was off the top of my head, not something I long ago composed. I am sure I left out pieces that suggested Canada as Obozo’s birth place.
There is no legal paper trail on his origin.
All documents that have been presented are clearly conjured. Like his life story line. It changes as his current needs change. Hence, it is clearly a lie.
When this finally unravels it is going to be a dam buster.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
