Posted on 03/15/2013 3:51:54 PM PDT by Cold Case Posse Supporter
Lt. Mike Zullo, lead investigator of Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Maricopa County Sheriff Department's Cold Case Posse has been attending CPAC. Carl Gallops has been attending CPAC with Lt. Zullo and has reported what has transpired with their meetings with many high official lawmakers on Capitol Hill about Barack Obama's ineligibility to be President of the United States. At the meetings, lawmakers and VIP's were overwhelmed (shocked) at the evidence they were presented with that proves Obama's birth documents are fraudulent. Listen to the video for their report.
The staff of the Hawaii DOH needs to charged with ALLOWING the fraud to continue. They should all serve long sentences.
Yes - though picture their defense: they were coerced to do so by The President of The United States.
But what if the fraud occurred in 1961 with the placement of a perfectly valid and legal birth certificate in the files that contained false information?
All the staff at HDOH has done is confirm that there is a birth certificate on file that contains certain data points.
None of the staff since 2007 may be implicated in any wrong doing. The crime might well be 52 years old.
Remember that on August 31, 1961 Barack Obama Senior told the Immigration and Naturalization Service that he had a son born in Honolulu on August 4, 1961. That was in Senior’s request for a student visa extension in the now famous William Woods memo that was released under a Freedom of Information Act request.
The pdf would be my guess. BUt have we seen the lab results?
However the state of Hawaii has confirmed in three Letters of Verification (for the Secretaries of State in Arizona and Kansas and for a federal judge in Mississippi) that the data on the whitehouse.gov image matches the data on the original, vault copy long form.
If the data is indeed the same, where is the intent to defraud?
Interesting, that you point to more fraud, in order to defend fraud - INS docs that are as phony as the entire “Obama Narrative”. Remind me to have Orly include these in the upcoming forensic investigations.
“None of the staff since 2007 may be implicated in any wrong doing.”
Keep talking. So, you are suggesting that the crime occurred prior to 2007. Agreed. The fraud was effected long before “The 2008 Obama Campaign” was publicly underway. They weren’t stupid ... so they thought.
I read on an older thread that a newspaper article in Chicago referred to him as Kenyan-born when he was running for state senate
Do you see any issues or anomalies of any kind associated w Obama’s birth records? Or do you see everything on his side as being in perfect order, and as having been in perfect order from the beginning? If so, to what do you ascribe the many questions raised by such a disparate group of investigators, etc.? Do they all arise from the fevered brains of racists kooks? If people would just settle down and accept the first ‘black’ POTUS, would all the issues magically disappear?
While we’re at it, how about answering this one. Where did Obama’s literary agency get the Kenyan birth “fact”. I.e.: the “fact” that they ‘forgot to fact-check’. You’d think a literary agency would be able to figure out where an author they paid a large advance to was born. If all else failed [heavy sarc], couldn’t they just...oh, I don’t know...ASK him???
Really?
1961 is not when the records were likely reworked. Try 1971.
But in any case Okubo has said - we can not say what that is an image of...referring to the images posted by Democratic operative blogs (include Fact Check). So she clearly KNOWS the image is not that of an official Hawaii-issued document. If she KNOWS this she has a duty and responsibility to report it.
Fast forward to 2011. Fuddy gives records to someone, somehow in the Obama camp AND writes a cover letter. In all likelihood the the records are swapped out and but the cover letter is used with the clearly digitially created LFBC - not the records provided by Hawaii. Now Fuddy’s name and position are openly and obviously being used to commit fraud. She does nothing. She has exposed herself and her department to potential criminal and civil action if the LFBC is not the document(s) she gave the Obama team.
Yes, they are culpable. Yes, they are exposed. But it is good to see someone has thought it through enough to have a defense when the music stops and the chairs are not there. Okuba and Fuddy in pink in the Arizona desert - there is a sight.
Notice that Brian Schatz was the smart one. He would not sign the OCON in 2008 declaring Obama a natural born Citizen. His actions are very telling. He is trying keep his options open when the music stops. He will let Nancy swing for declaring Obama Constitutionally Eligible.
Could be. When I did my earlier post, I was aware that I was not including other evidence supporting a Kenyan birth.
There are several articles in various African English language newspapers from the time of US Senate run and first presidential run, images of which I have seen, which state that he was born in Africa (don't recall specifically whether Kenya was claimed). Then there was also the publicity blurb for a book Obama wrote, published in the US, which stated he was born in Kenya, probably based on info that Obama himself gave to his publisher or an agent for the publisher.
Word!!!!!
That’s exactly where its at now!
The forgery/lies/loosey goosey Hawaii system/ has now borne its criminal fruit!
High crimes and mis-demeanors, anyone???!!!????
Book ‘em!!
What do you think was reworked in 1971? There are pre-1971 corroborations of the 1961 birth date and birth place: the 1961 birth index of all Hawaii births, the August 13 & 14, 1961 Honolulu newspaper birth announcements, the 1964 Dunham-Obama divorce decree, the 1967 US State Department interview with Lolo Soetoro, and the 1968 Jakarta, Indonesia Santo Fransiskus Asisi Catholic School application.
I still believe that if there was fraud, it goes back to the very beginning. Why else would Barack Obama Senior be acknowledging paternity and naming birth place and birth date just three weeks after the alleged birth?
Yes, absolutely correct. And now whoever stands in the way of allowing for proper inspection of the identity of the unvetted one can potentially be prosecuted as an accomplice to a grand conspiracy. Is the democratic party willing to go to the mat for a criminal? Or will they throw HIM under the bus along with Eric Holder?
Why thank you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.