Posted on 07/19/2012 5:28:21 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
It now appears the worst fears of the U.S. Constitution’s framers were well founded as investigators working on behalf of the ongoing investigation into the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama have found yet another lead in a growing mountain of evidence within the public records section of the British National Archives indicating the occurrence of at least four vital events registered to the name of Barack Obama, taking place in the British Protectorate of East Africa (Kenya) between 1953 and 1963, including the birth of two sons before 1963.
The record of birth of a second son prior to Kenyan independence is significant because biographical information about Obama’s family indicates Obama Sr. fathered only one other son prior to Obama II’s birth.
The books containing hand written line records of vital events attributed to Obama are contained in Series RG36 of the Family Records section in the Kew branch of the BNA. The hand written line records first discovered in 2009, indicate several events were registered to the name Barack Obama (appears to be handwritten and spelled “Burack” and “Biraq”) beginning in 1953 and include two births recorded in 1958 and 1960, a marriage license registration in 1954 and a birth in 1961. Barack Obama is said to have died in 1982 and had married at least once more in Kenya and had at least one more child in 1968, but no record of these were found in the BNA because, according to the Archives’ desk reference, the events occurred after Kenya achieved independence from British colonial rule in 1963.
To date, Barack Obama II is the only known alleged son of Obama Sr. born after 1960 and before the independence of Kenya became official in 1963.
(Excerpt) Read more at thedailypen.blogspot.com ...
since I told you to fast forward to the 1 hour 30 minute mark, I guess you must have fallen asleep
Well my eyes were still open, so it must have been a brain fart. I read it as 1 min 30 seconds. BLUSH! BLUSH!
From the Daily Pen article:
Recall, on August 1, 2009, Dr. Alan Keyes, Pamela Barnett and 42 other plaintiffs filed evidence in a lawsuit challenging Obama eligibility which included a copy of an image of an alleged Kenyan Copy of Certification of Registration of Birth (CCRB).
(snip)
It is now supported by the evidence discovered in the BNA that the Bomford document image from Australia was accessed and used by pro-Obama operatives as a template to alter the image of the Kenyan CCRB image in order to make it appear that “birthers” had created a bad counterfeit of a Kenyan birth record for Obama. This was done by Obama’s forgers to create “shell game” confusion among the public and misdirect media attention from the truth that an original, unaltered Kenyan CCRB, which was never allowed to be publicly seen in its original form before Obama’s forgers were able to access and change it, was actually an image of a legitimate document posted by unknown individuals who were known by Obama to possess the document before hand.
Not that it means anything, but when I first saw the “photo” of them sitting on the couch, I found her “right hand” holding the baby’s leg to be sort of creepy.
I don’t know what it is about that hand, I just know it gives me the creeps.
I’ll raise my hand to being one of the researchers, but as to what I agree with, well, that’s not really anyone’s business at this stage. But IF a real court case, with discovery and potential for criminal charges on the fraudulent little commie bastard boy EVER happens, I’ll be glad to step forward, with government protection of course.
The phrase “The 12 claimed FReeper researchers” refers, as I have clearly explained, to the number of FReeper researchers working on the Mal-Val narrative evidence AS CLAIMED BY Fred Nerks (FN) and NOT BY ME, so quit asking me who they are. FN has corrected his own estimate to be 10 researchers instead of twelve, so why are you ABUSING me in violation of FR rules over something I never said by calling me a LIAR and MORON and TROLL repeatedly?
Zoom in on their lips. Am I seeing things or were Sarah's lips put onto Hussein? Look at where her scars are and then see the same areas lightened on him. Then the right side (his left) of his lips should be showing a bit more so it's been smudged a bit.
1. Direct (not hearsay) witness Ruth Ndesandjo afirms birth dates of her two boys exactly matching their relative ages in both the family and studo pictures which Mark Obama Ndesand says ar of himself and his brother.
2. Direct witness (not hearsay) Mark affirms the existence of his brother and that it is he and his brother David who are in the picture together at the salon and in the family picture.
3. Malik (hearsay witness to the picture) posted a picture of David on his US charity website, but Malik also affirms the existence of David.
That is solid multiple first person witness affirmation acceptable to any honest investigator or historian absent any credible evidence to the contrary of which there is NONE to my knowledge.
I don’t have any expertise in photoshopping so it has to be more obvious for me to see anything. With this crew of fiends, anything nefarious is possible.
Ewwwwww, I didn’t even notice the left hand. I was too focused on the right.
It looks like a freakin claw!
I did notice Lolo’s “pants”. I just assumed it was perhaps a jacket or something he folded up and put in his lap.
Looking @ the pic again, it seems barry, as a little boy, has man boobs.
Your problem is that you are assuming that these people are all telling the truth and have not been paid money to lie, or threatened to get them to lie, or are lying in order for financial gain.
Oh, really? Someone should have told Tiger Woods that he couldn't play the British Open that same year.
Lolo's right arm reaches in 3D Imax to the end of the arm of the settee, while his normal left arm relaxes to his side, his right hand far shy of his knee.Lolo's belt is eight inches smaller than his waist forcing his belly to bulge somewhat, his right pants pocket to push toward the Chinese mainland.
The bizarre confluence of elements in Lolo's lap might be clippings from the darkroom floor.
Oh of course his fat right forearm and floating right elbow have only to do with foreshortening of the focal length, depth of field, artifacts of flash, and so on, and so forth and scooby dooby doo.
The baby slipped on a baby glove on her left forearm as a prescient homage to Michael Jackson.
Maybe the settee sloped to the right, its arm to our right doesn't actually present as darker and more sinuous.
If the tile base is level the settee is skewed.
Or the image is a composite.
I will continue to call you a LIAR until you can show us where she has claimed that there are 12 FReepers who believe that Malcolm X and Valerie Sarruf are the parents of your president!
Also Lolo’s right arm looks a LOT BIGGER than his left.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.