OBAMA’S KENYAN BIRTH RECORDS DISCOVERED IN BRITISH NATIONAL ARCHIVES

The Daily Pen ^ | July 18, 2012 | Dan Crosby

[Seizethecarp]

It now appears the worst fears of the U.S. Constitution’s framers were well founded as investigators working on behalf of the ongoing investigation into the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama have found yet another lead in a growing mountain of evidence within the public records section of the British National Archives indicating the occurrence of at least four vital events registered to the name of Barack Obama, taking place in the British Protectorate of East Africa (Kenya) between 1953 and 1963, including the birth of two sons before 1963.

The record of birth of a second son prior to Kenyan independence is significant because biographical information about Obama’s family indicates Obama Sr. fathered only one other son prior to Obama II’s birth.

The books containing hand written line records of vital events attributed to Obama are contained in Series RG36 of the Family Records section in the Kew branch of the BNA. The hand written line records first discovered in 2009, indicate several events were registered to the name Barack Obama (appears to be handwritten and spelled “Burack” and “Biraq”) beginning in 1953 and include two births recorded in 1958 and 1960, a marriage license registration in 1954 and a birth in 1961. Barack Obama is said to have died in 1982 and had married at least once more in Kenya and had at least one more child in 1968, but no record of these were found in the BNA because, according to the Archives’ desk reference, the events occurred after Kenya achieved independence from British colonial rule in 1963.

To date, Barack Obama II is the only known alleged son of Obama Sr. born after 1960 and before the independence of Kenya became official in 1963.

[Fred Nerks]

I don’t know where DrRJP obtained the images either. I believe Getty Images archive has one of MX with a woman who looks a lot like the woman on the video. But even if you find it, you can’t post Getty Images.

[aruanan]

I'll explain about the photos:

The one on the top, call it A, is a composite formed by

1. combining the infant from the big one on the bottom left, call it B, with the original version, call it C1, of the little one on the bottom right, call it C2, though before it was blurred, cropped, and used as C2,

2. cropping the hell out of the top composite photo to obscure what would be seen as obvious manipulation if any more of the infant could be seen and

3. using the blurring and overexposure to obscure other signs of assembly.

Therefore, there were two photos originally, B and C1, both the same size, both same distance from the camera, both the same focus, and only B is shown in the group below. A portion of B (the infant) was combined with a portion of C1 (cropped to include just Barry and his mom) and then enlarged to make A. C1 was blurred and perhaps shrunk a little bit to try to make it look like a separate photo, the result being C2. The unseen original, C1, though, was not any blurrier than B for this reason: Top photo A came from C1 as seen in Barry's position and the wrinkles in his shirt and the curve of her hair on the left side; therefore the cropped blurry photo, C2, shown to the right of B, being blurrier than B cannot be the source of the top photo A. The blurriness in A could possibly arise naturally from the approximate 50% enlargement of the composite constructed from B and the unseen original, C1. The blurriness of C2, though, is deliberate, since it was the source of Barry and mom in top photo A and you can't go from a more blurry and smaller photo to a less blurry and larger photo that also shows pixelation unseen in bottom left photo B--so the manipulation wasn't done in the darkroom using film and photographic paper.

[Fred Nerks]

HELP! What about she’s sitting in a chair without a baby and zero is sitting on the arm of the chair, and then when we look at the couch image, the arm of the chair has obviously been painted on, and now the OTHER ARM OF THE CHAIR HAS GONE BECAUSE SHE’S NOW SITTING NEXT TO THE MAN...because they removed zero and used another image of him to place beside her? And that’s just for starters, but I’m glad you started it, because there are HUGE questions about that entire story. And how can she be holding a baby in two different photographs, one sitting in a chair and then she supposedly moved to a couch, and the child doesn’t move it’s head...and in one photo the baby is in the centre and in another the baby is off centre...but it still hasn’t moved????
And she’s sitting in exactly the same position in one with a baby and in one without a baby...that’s why I call it INSTANT BABY!

[danamco]

Who should we believe, Maraniss of this one???

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=6jrrnkKmUzo&NR=1

[Fred Nerks]

And we need to remember, all the images came from the web and from videos, just as you see them:

[danamco]

So you just take it for granted that Tim Adams was not intelligent enough to have looked for the B.C. himself, huh???

[Fred Nerks]

Neither. The author of the book that tells the truth will need to remain anonymous. And probably no publisher will touch it.

[little jeremiah]

Maraniss has his lips implanted on Zero’s behind. If you think he does not, you are seriously deranged. He supports the myth! Two quotes:

---

Finally, the name of Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann, was unusual enough that doctors and nurses in Honolulu remembered it and her giving birth. One prominent doctor was asked by a young journalist if anything interesting had happened in the medical world that week, and he responded, “Well, Stanley had a baby!”

---

That wasn’t a journalist, it was an old Punahou teacher, lying about a doctor who had retired from delivering babies in 1961. And regarding doctors and nurses remembering her giving birth? A lie made up out of whole cloth.

---

In tandem with the birther notion comes the idea that Obama is a secret Muslim.

---

BS that needs no comment.

Maraniss is a lying a-hole and 0kaka suckup.

[little jeremiah]

FR isn’t a courtroom. Thankfully.

[danamco]

They must have be taken from the Toussaud’s wax musseum, because every single smiles and wrinkles on shirts are exactly the same on all photos, hmmm!!!

[Fred Nerks]

I’ll tell you what I think, although you may be able to better explain how they did it...it seems to me, they had a photograph of SAD sitting in a chair. They also had an image of zero sitting on the arm of a chair, but we don’t know who was sitting IN that chair.
There was a photograph of a man also sitting in a chair, and as the left upright of the arm of the chair seems to match the right in both images, they were the original arms of BOTH chairs, with the exception of the armrest that was damaged when the image of zero was removed and which were used to create the appearance of a couch, which they needed to do to place the four people on that piece of furniture that was created.
They never had an image of SAD holding a baby, not at that time, not while she was dressed the way she was, and it’s even doubtful if she was wearing a black dress, because black is the chosen colour of manipulators, I would need to be convinced that dress was black to start with, or...she was dressed in black all the better to create the group image.
Furthermore, how do we know this is Lolo Soetoro they are showing us, there seems to be a break in that body, can I see one person tacked onto another in the region of his waist? Why do his trousers appear to belong to another person...why the left-over material that make his trousers look as if, if he were to stand up, his pants would fall down?
And that’s without asking, how can zero have arms long enough to reach across his so-called mother’s back, and be holding her arm without making the slightest impression, why does it appear as if his fingers have been added on like an after-thought.
There’s LOTS that doesn’t look right.

[Seizethecarp]

“So you just take it for granted that Tim Adams was not intelligent enough to have looked for the B.C. himself, huh???”

IIRC, Adams did not claim to have directly searched himself or had access to the DOH archive. He only said those who supposedly knew told his superiors there was no BC.

[Fred Nerks]

Finally, the name of Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann, was unusual enough that doctors and nurses in Honolulu remembered it and her giving birth. One prominent doctor was asked by a young journalist if anything interesting had happened in the medical world that week, and he responded, “Well, Stanley had a baby!”

OMG. And Barbara Nelson, who came from Bufallo the same year as Abercrombie, wrote down the name Dr West told her, on a table napkin and sent it to her father...because it sounded so musical and she knew he would be interested. Yep, I remember. She also ended up being zero's teacher. And Dr West? Me thinkum he died. But he had given up obstetrics five year before...

Shameless liars, all of them. And this author Maraniss? Better not say it. No need, actually.

[Fred Nerks]

Good observation, that’s what happens, they put them together on the couch, and none of them are aware there’s anyone else there, because there wasn’t! It’s the instant baby that fascinates me.
And SAD’s hands look like they came from a cadaver.

[danamco]

He has NOT claim the opposite either, but he WAS the election clerk, wasn’t he???

And Abercommie also claimed he coul NOT find anything, right???

[danamco]

SADO’s hands on the photo with her and Soebarkah look like loaned from a mannikin ???

[danamco]

SADO’s hands on the photo with her and Soebarkah look like loaned from a mannikin ???

[Seizethecarp]

“He has NOT claim the opposite either, but he WAS the election clerk, wasn’t he???

“And Abercommie also claimed he coul NOT find anything, right???”

IIRC HI statutes preclude even the governor from directly examining the BC files. Adams was a contract supervisor of clerks who verified voter qualification documents for elections including examining BC’s presented by voters. I don't think Adams had any authorization to examine non-voter BCs like Barry's BC on his own.

[Fred Nerks]

Neil Abercrombie said he would find that BC by hook or by crook, he knew it was there, because he saw it, it was half typed, half written...and then we heard nothing more. And that’s all I remember.
He also said he was in Hawaii when that child was born...which really only means he remembers that he was LIVING in Hawaii in August 1961, he would have no more idea of who was born when than you or I have...and yes, he does remember Anne, he said she brought their child to social occasions, and then corrected himself and said he remembers zero playing T Ball. (That would be at age 5 btw.)
Which sorta doesn’t quite jell with zero saying in 1993 that he went to Indonesia when he was two years of age.
Methinks he found what he was looking for. He’s the guv you know, and when he saw what he saw and found the name of the mother, he backed right away and clammed up. Methinks he found the maiden name of Ann S Obama.

[Fred Nerks]

There’s definitely something very seriously wrong with her hands. But then, when you take a closer look at the baby, it has a seriously deformed arm above the elbow...like I once observed, if you had lots of time to kill, you could write a book about that one image alone. Just look at SAD’s hair, they painted a lot of it out, just to get zero looking like he’s sitting beside her on the arm of that chair...