Posted on 06/24/2011 6:25:19 AM PDT by Ordinary_American
In a February 13, 1818 letter to H. Niles, John Adams wrote:
But what do we mean by the American Revolution? Do we mean the American war? The Revolution was affected before the war commenced. The Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people; a change in their religious sentiments, of their duties and obligations This radical change in the principles, opinions, sentiments, and affections of the people was the real American Revolution.
The first shots of the Second American Revolution have not been fired, but the battle lines have been drawn.
There is now a radical change in the principles, opinions, sentiments, and affections of the American people.
Petitioning the current Congress for the redress of grievances is futile. Members of Congress have turned a deaf ear to the voices of their constituents.
The present occupiers of the US Government openly violate the Constitution, are hopelessly corrupt and politically correct, have brought us to the brink of bankruptcy, have opened our borders to illegal immigration and have permitted a fifth column promoting Sharia law to infiltrate our society.
They can no longer be trusted as guardians of our posterity.
Not a week goes by without yet another document analyst claiming that his Certificate of Live Birth presented by Obama at his press conference on April 27, 2011 is a forgery.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
I never made the claim that a naturalized citizen was eligible to run for POTUS.
He completely blew past the last part of my sentence...it just gave him the same rights as one...in an attempt to "make a point".
Dog Runs Circles.
It probably varies with each state. I would continuously contact the state election board and ask when they have received Nancy Pelosi's assurance that he's eligibile. They probably can't convene a hearing until they've got evidence of a breach, (i.e. inadequate proof of eligibility.) I dare say that without some sort of law forcing them to look at specific information regarding eligibility, they will probably just put him on the ballot anyway. To make an issue of his lack of eligibility now, would be to admit they made a mistake in allowing him on in the first place. I cannot conceive of bureaucrats willingly admitting that they made a mistake.
It might be possible to bring a suit against the election officials for failing to establish legitimacy, but if an individual has not standing to sue against an illegal President, then the courts will probably rule they don't have the standing to sue an election board either. (for not doing their job.)
As you like. One would think that an internet denizen of your experience would be past the point of taking faceless incivility seriously. I do however notice that your position gives you an excuse not to answer the questions. Clever tactic that.
I’m the same way, you have to read through just to catch up with the context of the comments.
I really am at the point now where I just skim through or skip troll posts.
After going back and reading what you sent to me, I am now forever convinced I was right to do so.
That guys circular logic will make your eyes and brain bleed...yikes!
LOL...the 80’s were great times ****sigh****
1329! Waaaaaay too many replies for me to go through at this juncture.
It’s a long one for sure, but one of the best I’ve ever seen here.
There really is some amazing research and posters on it.
LOL, sorry ‘bout that!
It really is a good thread though.
May be just poke through it when thing are slow here.
Check yer FR mail.
I don’t look at it as the state folks making a mistake so much as I view it as the states were defrauded, scammed, obamaized by Pelicanosi and the DNC criminal enterprise. The registry folks in HI, supposedly his home state, would not give him a pass and Pelican Nose forced him through without actually being verified by the state election folks, IIRC.
NP! I love you all. Now that I feel warm and fuzzy. ;0)
Don’t let Mr. Rogers tell you being wrong and gay is OK.
As LEO stated:
How the heck can a ‘SUBJECT OF THE BRITISH CROWN’ even be considered a “natural born Citizen’!
WOng’s parents would have become citizens of the USA if they could have.
but that was when we respected other nations laws, WONG was stoped at the re-entry and told he was a subject to China’s emperor and had no right to re-enter.
What really burns my bicuits, is how Mark Levin, who acts as though he is Mr. Constitution; who is our best freind when it comes to ‘Anchor Babies’ and the act of having illegal tresspassers sneak into our hospitals...He reckognizes that the only reason we use state funds to educate the illegal tresspassing offspring, was decided by a state that ruled how Texas school systems did not reckognize enough damage to the state to deny state funds transfered to illegal tresspassing offspring enough to deny educating them. (wimk-wink)
Where did the dis-connect start?
LOL, funny that you should bring up Mrs. WKA.....lol!!
I tried, but your link doesn’t work.
Ah. Thanks.
I generally read a reply, and then respond to it, then read the next one.
As shown by my last two posts.
As human beings, we tend to assume that other people think like us. That usually isn’t the case. People have different thinking styles and ways of processing information.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.