[philman_36]

See, I wrote 447 (9:56:11) as a supplement to 445 which I had posted just seven minutes earlier (9:43:59) as the "To 445" in 447 indicates. I even included both names in both replies.
The reply to 445 came at 10:25:32 in reply 448. The reply to 447 came at 450 at 10:38:33.
Now, I don't know about you, but when I see that I've got replies I'm smart enough to see if there is more than one on the same thread. I read all of them and then respond. I guess some people don't think that way.

[Las Vegas Ron]

I’m the same way, you have to read through just to catch up with the context of the comments.

I really am at the point now where I just skim through or skip troll posts.

After going back and reading what you sent to me, I am now forever convinced I was right to do so.

That guys circular logic will make your eyes and brain bleed...yikes!

[Jeff Winston]

I generally read a reply, and then respond to it, then read the next one.

As shown by my last two posts.

As human beings, we tend to assume that other people think like us. That usually isn’t the case. People have different thinking styles and ways of processing information.