Socialist American Indians Dissed Homeless, Capitalist Christopher Columbus

JoeClarke.Net ^ | 10/12/2009 | JoeClarke.Net

[joeclarke]

In fourteen hundred ninety-two. Columbus sailed the ocean blue.

The native American Indian tribes in Christopher Columbus's time were probably less socialist than they are today - dominated by so many Indian Affairs bureaus, state programs, and other governmental agencies which help (overregulate) every aspect of Indian life, so much so that their culture is not so much now perceived as brave, self sufficient warriors as much as politically correct dependents on Big Gov, who have been blessed with gambling enterprises, and who object to the franchising of Indian logos adopted by sports teams, especially those evil Cleveland Indians and their "grotesque" Chief Wahoo. They have become more affirmative action whiners than braves, again thanks to their Federal lord protectors, and PC advocates.

Columbus was financed by sinister white Europeans (now referred to as DWM - Dead White Males in universities) who were greedy for what the Bible calls filthy lucre, as well as adventure. Catholic King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella of Spain, having just been relieved of 700 years of Islamic terrorism, sent the Italian Columbus on his quest to India, but he got sidetracked . . .

The native Americans who Christopher encountered were not as innocent as modern historians profess in our modern non-diverse, self-loathing, prideful, white liberal universities throughout the fruited plain. Indians had only known warfare among their many tribes, and the only way to gain entitlement to land was by the forceful use of the tomahawk and bow. Columbus had only taken some entitlement to American lands and resources via the traditional Indian way, even if it was for Gold and God.

One of Columbus's first encounters was with the heathen Carib Indian tribes which were quite the cannibals, as described by Columbus and his men when they ventured into Carib territory where the "stench" of disemboweled bodies disgusted them so much that the Columbians either killed or enslaved them for their own heathenish good. Wherever you see advanced socialism, you will see death and death panels of one sort or another.

Another tribe, the Ararak, were very thankful to Columbus for delivering them from their Indian brethren who frequently raided them, took their wives, and ate their men. [I actually researched an ancient Indian recipe which described how the flesh eating Indians concocted a chili pepper basting sauce suitable for human consumption - and by consumption, I need not be more descriptive].Strangely enough, the North American Indians did not kill their unborn babies, like modern socialists like to do. The Mayan, Incas and Aztecs did, however kill postpartum babes by the hundreds of thousands.

Evil white Europeans were so horrified at the violence of the Injuns that they called them heathen (those who live in the woods) and savages (those who live in the woods). Those bad Europeans, calling people who lived in the woods, wood-livers.

Its not that the Columbians did not like the Indians, in fact, they liked some of them, especially the women, a bit too much. The Indians, having sort of a 60's hippie, free love, liberal cultural outlook, did not observe the sanctity of marriage, as we also do not today in the West, so they "shared" the squaws with whomever and whenever. Despite what some junk science historians and anthropologists attest, the Columbus crew carried newly acquired syphilitic infection's back to Europe where a pandemic engulfed the continent for many years to come. Unfortunately, evil white men had not created antibiotics, yet.

I am sorry to admit that the Columbians, indeed, thought they were viewing a pagan group of people who more resembled animals than humans - because of their behavior. This is the same way I view those who torture preborn fetuses, and those who kill one another in the inner cities, and those who take advantage of investors, like Madoff, and those who are sexual deviants, and those who commit adultery, and those . . . and they are not all liberal.

See Mel Gibson's Apocalypto

The Indians did not have enough capitalist-inspired technology, like advanced weaponry, to repel the White Anglo Saxon Catholics, and later the Protestants.
They also would never have had refrigeration - without European ingenuity.
Would they trade, today, their dismal existence on Indian Reservations, for the freedom and ability to again be "heathen," or those who live in the woods?

Native Americans also did not have title to property where they could individually own capital separate from the Indian Nation which governed them. Private property was to become the foundation for American independence and has endured a long history of success until recently when socialism has crept in (with all of its heathenism and savagery) to usurp the private property power of an individual with even more government regulation,taxes, and oversight into every vestige of our lives.

Who will be the next Columbians to invade our heathen land and plunder our lands, women, children, guns, lands, and money? I am thinking they will be even less Christian than Columbus.

[MNJohnnie]

Guess they will not be talking about the Imperialistic Carib tribe and their cannibalistic habits

[fso301]

Stone age peoples in 1492 and still stone age after 400 years of contact with techically superior Europeans.

[2banana]

Before Indians were running casinos and selling cigarettes tax-free in North America, they were a stone-age people before the “pale face” came. They had not learned to domesticate animals (except dogs and lamas), they had no written language, they used only stone tools and they had not even yet invented the wheel.

They had never seen a horse, a metal knife, a cart or a plow.

They also commonly practiced slavery, genocide and cannibalism against other tribes. No matter how many times you watch “Dances with Wolves” and “Pocahontas,” it will not change these facts. The vast majority of Missionaries wanted to spread the gospel of Christ and raise these new converts out of their stone-age way of life. What should they have done? Ignore them?

In terms of population percentage loss, the worst war we ever fought was King Philip’s War in 1675-76. King Philip was an indian chief (also known as Metacomet) who attacked to oust white settlers from New England. The Indians burned down/destroyed twelve of ninety Puritan towns and attacked forty others (including Providence). The Colonists’ population was small in 1675 and a good percentage of that population was killed in the war (with about 1000 slain out of a population of 52,000, this death rate was nearly twice that of the Civil War and more than seven times that of World War II). The Indians lost the war.

The vast majority of Indians sided with the French in the French And Indian War (1753). The indians lost the war.

The vast majority of Indians sided with the British in the Revolution. The Indians lost the war. Think about that - the Freedoms we have today and the Freedoms the Indians use without shame are the same Freedoms their ancestors fought against.

The vast majority of Indians sided with the British again in the War of 1812. The Indians lost the war.

As the Americans moved west, fighting was constant on both sides. The Indians lost every time.

The judgment of history is merciless.

[elli1]

The Indians, having sort of a 60's hippie, free love, liberal cultural outlook, did not observe the sanctity of marriage, as we also do not today in the West, so they "shared" the squaws with whomever and whenever.

Yeh, and such a shame. Those dastardly Indians took half the fun out of the europeans' Rape & Pillage Plan.

[tcrlaf]

“They had not learned to domesticate animals (except dogs and lamas), they had no written language, they used only stone tools and they had not even yet invented the wheel.

They had never seen a horse, a metal knife, a cart or a plow.

They also commonly practiced slavery, genocide and cannibalism against other tribes.”

In other words, it was a Liberal Green Utopia!!

[joeclarke]

“Yeh, and such a shame. Those dastardly Indians took half the fun out of the europeans’ Rape & Pillage Plan.”

Rape and Pillage. . . Isn’t that what we call war, unfortunately?

I am not sure if Indian women had to be raped. They were glad to conjoin with the wealthy-looking European guys (like today) donning all that bling and those fancy Spanish outfits - all with their husbands approval. That was the Indian way.

[Radl]

That long trip over here had to make those guys unbelievably horny.

[Coleus]

The Crimes of Christopher Columbus

[SunkenCiv]

Note: this topic is from 10/12/2009. Thanks joeclarke.