Posted on 09/27/2009 8:12:50 AM PDT by Danae
The UIPA at 92F-3 explicitly defines government records as follows:
Government record means information maintained by an agency in written, auditory, visual, electronic, or other physical form.
When a state agency in Hawaii is faced with a request for government records, the Office of Information Practices Administrative Rules govern all responses to such a request. State agencies may not issue a response which doesnt conform to the OIP Administrative Rules.
Agencies must answer every request for government records within the four following types of response:
1. the agency has the record and will provide it to you
2. the agency does not maintain/possess the record
3. the agency has the record but you are denied access to it
4. the agency needs more information from you to understand your request
These are examples of the four basic responses available to a state agency. For example, an agency may not tell a person that the agency refuses to say whether they possess a certain record.
This very issue was discussed in OIP Opinion Letter 97-08, wherein a staff attorney for the Corporation Counsel was faced with a UIPA request concerning a legal memo. The staff attorney refused to acknowledge whether the legal memo existed by citing attorney client privilege.
(Excerpt) Read more at naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com ...
She might have been hoping you would do just that, consult with an attorney who would look at the case and see that Hawaii was not following its own UIPA laws and involve OIP just as Leo and MissTickly have done! :)
Sounds like some liberal justices are trying to stack the deck.
Is this in an on-line manual ?
++++++++++
If there is an online manual, a few of us should download it, for validation purposes. It’s probably a PDF download and you can basically have a timestamp. That way if they change it, you’ll have proof they changed it - and approx. when. (you may have already been planning to do this.)
Remember ? if they call us birthers NUTS or CRAZY .. just remind them of a man named NOAH
+++++++++++++++++
And remind them that we’re not the ones covering up our entire past while persuing the US Presidency.
The suffering of liars .......
+++++++++++++
Quite an intriguing picture you paint..
THERE IS FIRE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HA HA!! SQUIRM, ZER0, SQUIRM!!
Between this and the ACORN tapes, I would have to say that September might have been even worse than August! :)
Right, some elements in his campaign just put something with the title ‘certification of live birth’ online. That's it. No proof that even that was real/authentic - and that's not a long form.
Further, people aren't asking the more fundamental question of his parentage and how that relates to Barry being or NOT BEING a natural born citizen, required in Article II of the USC.
Now the SCOTUS needs to rule on this matter. But I don't think they will as long as the usurper in chief is in the WH - because of the political implications (such as they are and notwithstanding the clear Constitutional evisceration that will happen instead.)
It is a sad shame what has happened hear...under the cover of the American Public’s apathy toward the USC and our political so-called leaders.
Oh hello MissTickly - great to see you back!
Oh, and thank you for your excellent work! Fabulous. Praying for you both!!
If Obama had the Adoption legally nullified, his COLB would have reverted back to the original form, with out the amended language on it.
+++++++++++++++
But would the amendment stamp itself have still been applied?
I pray you're right.
But based upon the level of internal corruption we've seen in Hawaii govt on this matter, it's quite unknown the number of layers of obfuscation, redirection, and deception we're going to have to cut through to get to the Truth. But like you & Leo, I see what's going on here too and know the DOH's and Lt Gov's interpretation is flawed and politically-motivated. I see Justice prevailing in the end.
What I read in the statute said that it would go back to what it had said before the Adoption, which means to me that it would not have an “Amended” on it.
“Reverts back to the original” I believe was the language used.
Thank you!
What I read in the statute said that it would go back to what it had said before the Adoption, which means to me that it would not have an Amended on it.
Reverts back to the original I believe was the language used.
++++++++++++++
Oh, I see. So they still have all the versions on hand? That seems curious.
They have to keep everything. They cannot destroy or delete anything.
http://hawaii.gov/health/vital-records/vital-records/amendment.html
Rec’d this from “crosstimbers”
Not a manual, but some info on amendments
Thanks for the ping!
“Front page of Indianapolis Star this morning headline says that ACORN is no longer in Indiana...”
ACORN???
Or is ACORN Housing (The Fed-subsidized Home Mortgage Broker front scheme) no longer in Indiana...
bookmark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.