Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Let's prove Obama Was Born In Hawaii So we Can Move Onto His British Birth
NaturalBornCitizen Blog ^ | 09/21/2009 | Leo Donofrio

Posted on 09/21/2009 11:32:45 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan

Let this post be fair warning… Leo Donofrio is now interested in the birth certificate… so that we can finally prove Obama was born in Hawaii and stop the never ending circus surrounding BIGFOOT – an official long form birth certificate for President Obama.

The nation faces a crucial legal question:

How can a person who admits to having been born a British citizen – governed at birth by British law – be a natural born citizen of the United States?

This is a very serious legal question. Obama's father was never a US citizen and was never permanently domiciled in the US. The leading Supreme Court decision in Wong Kim Ark indicates that the native born son of an alien is not natural born. There is no conspiracy theory attached to this question. Let's state it another way:

Can a person who is at birth a dual citizen be considered a natural born citizen for purposes of meeting the Constitution’s requirements to be POTUS?

That is in no way a conspiracy theory. The US State department web site - now run by Obama – tells us that dual citizens owe allegiance to both nations and that while on the soil of the foreign nation that nation has a greater claim to the person than the US. It is certainly not trivial for US citizens to ask whether dual citizenship at birth means a person is not a “natural born citizen” of the US.

But as long as the never ending search for Bigfoot continues to obscure the real legal question, the true issue here will not only be attached to the conspiracy theory, it will be ridiculed as well.

Because of the conundrum, this blog will now also be concerned with an investigation into the vital records of President Obama as well as an intense focus upon the activities of the Hawaii Department of Health and the Hawaii Office of Information Practices. I hope to one day put these officials under oath and cross-examine them thoroughly.

I have always believed that Obama was born in Hawaii and I expect this investigation will reveal that he was. Upon proving that he was born in Hawaii, we may uncover details which indicate that Obama and Hawaii government officials purposely used the birth certificate issue to distract the nation from his British birth problems. If a smokescreen can be made clear, the nation will better comprehend the Constitutional blasphemy inherent in the 2008 POTUS election and the current White House resident.

Should our investigation prove that he wasn’t born in Hawaii, I will be very surprised, but I am certainly open to that conclusion.

I have written this post as a preview to some very interesting research – documents and letters issued by the State of Hawaii – which have not been made public yet. I will be making those public very soon as they are the product of researchers I am working with. Stay tuned. It’s going to get interesting.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; eligibility; hawaii; obama; orlytaitz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-192 next last
To: Sibre Fan

OK, you’re accepting the word of the paper, even though we know that they fail to print the truth day by day.

I simply do not accept the word of any news medium WO corroboration.


161 posted on 09/21/2009 7:58:29 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bomb-a administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Lower55
"I’ts what is required to be a NBC."

That's what YOU say. I asked what part of the constitution says that.

162 posted on 09/21/2009 8:06:55 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: etraveler13
I'm quite familiar with Sandra Lines statement. You'll not that nowhere in it does she agree that it is a forgery. All she says is what she would say about any scan or image, even of a perfectly authentic document.

A document examiner will not authenticate an image. That's all she says.

163 posted on 09/21/2009 8:09:24 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

If you want to offer a cite to something, go right ahead. But I’ve been over and over this with the birthers for months. It’s not me being thick-headed. You can see right on this thread where some of them refuse to accept what is written in black and white.


164 posted on 09/21/2009 8:11:49 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

The lack of savvy in taking what is on microfiche in HI as absolute gospel truth is troubling since it is so easy to alter what the microfiche record reflects AND because neither paper lists the birth of the Nordyke TWINS born within hours of Barry. Add to that the fact that the Nordyke twins’ father listed for purposes of his wifes prenatal care his address as the clinic addy on the same street as the supposed Obama residence and we have the even easier means to alter the microfiche records of the two papers. Only corroboration of the record will make the microfiche records genuine ... the absence of the Nordyke twins, born to a Doctor on the Islands is most disturbing since that would have been a far more noteworthy event than the baby born to the underaged daughter of a banker on the Islands ... and the twins are not listed in any of the papers which followed for four weeks after their birth. Frankly, when someone makes the microfiche imagery an axiom to their argument for Barry’s place and time of birth, I immediately see them as a shill or ill informed and satisfied to remain such.


165 posted on 09/21/2009 10:30:06 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Dems, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

And I forgot to mention that the Nordyke twins’ BC numbers are lower not higher than the one claimed for Barry who was born hours before them supposedly, at the same hospital.


166 posted on 09/21/2009 10:32:48 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Dems, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: mlo

Perhaps you missed this:
2. I have reviewed the attached affidavit posted on the internet from “Ron Polarik,” [PDF] who has declined to provide his name because of a number of death threats he has received. After my review and based on my years of experience, I can state with certainty that the COLB presented on the internet by the various groups, which include the “Daily Kos,” the Obama Campaign, “Factcheck.org” and others


“cannot be relied upon as genuine.

Mr. Polarik raises issues concerning the COLB that I can affirm. Software such as Adobe Photoshop can produce complete images or alter images that appear to be genuine”; therefore, any image offered on the internet cannot be relied upon as being a copy of the authentic document.


167 posted on 09/21/2009 11:13:42 PM PDT by etraveler13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
Was his US citizenship status ever lost or changed due to either of these issues?

The answer to that would be no. He could lose his citizenship only if he gave it up himself, and only as an adult.

168 posted on 09/22/2009 4:02:11 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
They cannot even acknowledge that Barry signed onto requirements for McCain that he himself could not meet by his own assertion of his father being a Kenyan at birth and he himself having British citizenship at birth.

He also couldn't meet them because he wasn't born in Panama.

169 posted on 09/22/2009 4:11:38 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Lower55
I’ts what is required to be a NBC.

And where exactly in the Constitution does it say that?

170 posted on 09/22/2009 4:15:28 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

Comment #171 Removed by Moderator

To: mlo
"You can see right on this thread where some of them refuse to accept what is written in black and white."

And time and time again, I see you refusing to accept the solid backup of the constitution contained in the Federalist Papers. The true meaning of "Natural Born Citizen" is clearly given therein, and you refuse to accept it.

There are no mysteries in the constitution; they all are resolved through the Federalist Papers, Websters 1828 Dictionary, Black's, and the Encyclopedia Britanica, but you don't like what they say.

172 posted on 09/22/2009 9:01:56 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bomb-a administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur; Lower55
"And where exactly in the Constitution does it say that?"

The constitution has no glossary; the answer is in the letters exchanged between Madison and Jay regarding that particular clause. Facts are so uncomfortable!

173 posted on 09/22/2009 9:05:35 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bomb-a administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: etraveler13

Well, that should be an interesting one to watch.


174 posted on 09/22/2009 9:13:04 AM PDT by El Sordo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

“Facts are so uncomfortable!”

Ditto. It get’s tiring playing with these obots.


175 posted on 09/22/2009 9:56:25 AM PDT by Lower55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: etraveler13

[You must understand that Stanley Ann Dunham, left America to go to Kenya]

You know this how? Is this provable fact? Or birther legend?


176 posted on 09/22/2009 10:51:36 AM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
I already told you, if you want to cite something go ahead. Just saying "Federalist Papers" is not a cite.

Time and time again, I've seen you and the others refuse to accept the clear explanation from a ruling of the United States Supreme Court, because you don't like what it says.

177 posted on 09/22/2009 11:42:23 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: rahbert

Lucas Smith provided a Birth Certificate to the courts that he secured personally in Mombasa, Kenya, which is in Orly Taitz presentation to the courts on Oct 5, 2009
I presume that for Obama to be born in Mombasa, Kenya
His mother would have to be present.
It is yet to be determined if it is a genuine document or not. It does not contradict the Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth, as Orly Taitz now has in her possession, the page 11 of the divorce decree which is Obama’s COLB from Hawaii.
It will be interesting to see what happens..


Her move to Indonesia:
Lolo Soetoro in 1971, with Ann, Maya and Barack.It was at the East-West Center that Dunham met Lolo Soetoro, a student from Indonesia.[28] They married in 1966 or 1967 and moved with six-year-old Barack to Jakarta, Indonesia, just after the unrest surrounding the ascent of Suharto.[29] In Indonesia


178 posted on 09/22/2009 12:13:32 PM PDT by etraveler13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: mlo

YOu are a real scammer!

How does a devoted Obummanite manage to stay here lying, deflecting, and dissembling?

The SCOTUS has never ruled on this because there is nothing to rule on. Obama is the first pretender to pull a coup on the whitehouse.


179 posted on 09/22/2009 12:19:12 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bomb-a administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
The constitution has no glossary; the answer is in the letters exchanged between Madison and Jay regarding that particular clause.

Could you possibly be referring to the letter between John Jay and George Washington dated July 25, 1787? If so, then can you point out where Jay defines natural-born citizen?

Link

If you are, in fact, referring to a letter or letters between Jay and Madison where the definition of natural-born citizen was discussed then could you please give the dates and/or links?

Facts are so uncomfortable!

Indeed.

180 posted on 09/22/2009 3:52:32 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-192 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson