OK, you’re accepting the word of the paper, even though we know that they fail to print the truth day by day.
I simply do not accept the word of any news medium WO corroboration.
The lack of savvy in taking what is on microfiche in HI as absolute gospel truth is troubling since it is so easy to alter what the microfiche record reflects AND because neither paper lists the birth of the Nordyke TWINS born within hours of Barry. Add to that the fact that the Nordyke twins’ father listed for purposes of his wifes prenatal care his address as the clinic addy on the same street as the supposed Obama residence and we have the even easier means to alter the microfiche records of the two papers. Only corroboration of the record will make the microfiche records genuine ... the absence of the Nordyke twins, born to a Doctor on the Islands is most disturbing since that would have been a far more noteworthy event than the baby born to the underaged daughter of a banker on the Islands ... and the twins are not listed in any of the papers which followed for four weeks after their birth. Frankly, when someone makes the microfiche imagery an axiom to their argument for Barry’s place and time of birth, I immediately see them as a shill or ill informed and satisfied to remain such.