Posted on 09/13/2009 1:07:31 PM PDT by rxsid
NH SECRETARY OF STATE AGREES TO INVESTIGATE
Rep. Lawrence Rappaport, and his wife (Sept. 12, 2009) — New Hampshire State Representative, Lawrence M. Rappaport payed a visit to Mr. William Gardner, the NH Secretary of State, on Thursday, Sept. 10th.
His stunning request: an investigation of Barack Hussein Obama’s presence on the NH 2008 Ballot.
Gardner’s stunning response: an investigation will commence.
I interviewed Mr. Rappaport by email, and asked him, on what basis did he make his complaint; he responded, “The basis for all of this is possible fraud. I don’t know what penalties will be assessed if fraud is proven.”
Rappaport’s action follows stunning revelations that Nancy Pelosi deliberately signed two different forms certifying Barack Hussein Obama was the Democratic National Party candidate for the presidency. While these forms have been known to exist for some time, it was J.B. Williams, writing for the Canadian Free Press who brought them national notoriety, earlier this week.
It is unclear, if, in the eventuality that New Hampshire determines fraud was committed, on the grounds that Barack Hussein Obama is not a natural born citizen of the United States, if the State will move, through its governor, to take some sort of action on the National scene, or who would be liable in law for the crime committed in-state.
Alan Keyes has for the past couple of years. He’s a key plaintiff in one case.
Thanks for your OUTSTANDING work and explanation. BUMP-TO-THE-TRUTH!
Or just do both.
She certainly has been low key. That’s dangerous for BO. The Clinton’s aren’t ones to be relegated to the background for long.
Asinine reply, Regulator. You should apologize to jbjd. I’ve been following his work on this issue, and he is right.
Shame on you for the comment.
It would cause a Constitutional crisis which would ripple through the republic like a tsunami.
Having lived in NH for 27 years I am saddened to report that it is indeed the case. Run by democRATS and crumbling to dust.
See if you can open these
http://www.sos.nh.gov/President%20Intent.pdf
http://www.sos.nh.gov/intentpolorg.pdf
http://www.sos.nh.gov/rsa655.htm
Not asinine at all. This issue has been absolutely infested by stupid newbie catfights, money-grubbing blog floggers who absolutely have no regard for anything but driving hits to their site, and Democrat operatives looking to divert.
If the fool doesn’t copyright his work, then he has no leg to stand on. If he did, then pursue it in court. Don’t come on here bloviating about how somebody stole your credit, and immediately jump feet first into the “neo-Nazi” crap that the left is forever imagining.
I, myself have spend a great deal of time on this. I post my efforts to FR. I do not care who gets credit. I’ve seen my efforts lifted verbatim and posted to blog sites. I’ve seen the owners of said blog sites have hissy fits when they didn’t think they were making enough money, trying to guilt people into paying them. Never mind that they lifted information themselves.
That is the problem. If this person wants to be taken seriously, then the stupidity won’t be in the lead paragraph. It won’t be there at all.
Thanks. Still didn’t find the constitutional language I was hoping for.
“What happens if the investigation leads to an answer other than what we want?”
Then the issue is SETTLED, and we move on....
However, I think there is a REASON Obama is spending so much money and political capital to keep this under wraps. And may have NOTHING to do with citizenship.
Yes; that’s it.
Thank you.
Thank you and, you are welcome. And you are right.
You are very welcome. Our country is very welcome.
Did you see this blog mentioned in the comments section of the article:
Interesting stuff!
Thanks for the ping. Nazi Nancy and the democrat power circle are going down for this when it all comes out to a head.
If they proved the punk was never eligible to be president...what exactly would happen to Pelosi and Dean?
The Notary who verified the docs is in hot water...
Second doc...same as the first...but important constitutional statement deleted....
Would Arizona be in category “b”?
Also, I have been reading your blog and I am trying to keep up with all of this. Are you the same “JB” who was posting on Texas Darlin’ last fall?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.