SECOND ONE (WITHOUT ANY REFERENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION)
WHY WAS THE CONSTITUTIONAL REFERENCE REMOVED ?
Posted on 09/02/2009 8:04:37 PM PDT by Danae
Pelosi signed two Official Certifications of Nomination for Obama and Biden at the DNC Convention last August. Read the language carefully and note the difference between them:
SECOND ONE (WITHOUT ANY REFERENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION)
WHY WAS THE CONSTITUTIONAL REFERENCE REMOVED ?
Fred Nerks SAYS: "Just thinking out aloud here, see what you think":
Every copy I have seen online of an Hawaii CoLB has shown the place of birth as Oahu, County Honolulu. Isn’t that a little odd? Surely one or two should be from another island or another county?
Makes me think that ALL Certifications of Live Birth, Accepted OR Filed, bear that same information. (Until someone shows something different, anyway).
So, the original birth certificate for a child born in Hawaii shows the details relevant to the birth, and can be amended,(CHANGE OF NAME, ADOPTION ETC.,) with amendements shown only on the original.
Or, a late Certification could be applied for, (up until 1972 IIRC) whereby an out-of-state birth could be registered, and FILED. Again, this information remains on the original document...
When a ‘copy’, a Certification of Live Birth is requested, it’s by no means a ‘copy’ of the original birth certificate, it’s simply a standard form on which, as we know, the parents, the parents Race and the name of the child are shown.
Are you with me? The Place of Birth OAHU and the County HONOLULU may simply relate to the location of the OFFICE where the document was issued.
Therefor every CoLB shows the same, Place of Birth OAHU, County, HONOLULU.
AND THAT MAKES EVERYONE WHO HAS A COLB A CITIZEN OF THE US???
The next question might be, just how many people does this apply to? Thousands?
Thas more or less what I was thinking. I am sure Orly has seen this particular theory, I wanted to make sure that it happened doubly so. Knowing Hawaii, this really is a plausible theory.
Fred, O bow down before your reasoning! You DA MAN!
Yep, BINGO. All this needs is ONE legit Court case to unravel the Obama Myth. The man is a fraud, from step one.
Interesting site!
Being more Physics minded, the study of cantilevered hemispheres fascinates me ... even at 64.
later
Bump!
To the best of my knowledge the documents were the result of an FIO request - I saved them when I first saw them and passed them to a Freeper connected to one of the attorneys...thinking they were in good hands.
And then I forgot about them.
I didn’t see them again until STARWISE posted them on the Long Thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2040486/posts?page=8379#8379
boat? ... what boat???
So does anyone know which one was actually submitted?
For example, maybe they noticed they forgot an important phrase and reworked the document...or vice a versa...they saw a phrase they wanted taken out.
I believe it would be the stamped one.
I could be wrong.
I believe it would be the stamped one.
I could be wrong.
This is of note, the person who witnessed the document would likely remember signing 2 documents.
Prayers for Judge Carter.
Thanks for the ping!
see 68 and 72
school speech and Van Johnson smoke screens goin’ up to cover the actual court hearing on September 8.
This will likely avail nothing. This president and his men are from the Chicago machine. They can make Carter that “offer he can’t refuse.” The offer has probably already been made and not refused. The judge has family and an appreciation for the good things in life and for life itself.
Wow! That’s quite a piece! Lots to think about. Thanks for posting it.
Hang-’em-high-ping!
From what I gather, different states have different
requirements. The stamped one I read was supposedly
from South Carolina election officials signifying
their receipt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.