Posted on 04/02/2005 9:21:02 PM PST by TheConservativeCitizen
"The essence of civilization is that the strong have a duty to protect the weak. In cases where there are serious doubts and questions, the presumption should be in the favor of life."
"I urge all those who honor Terri Schiavo to continue to work to build a culture of life where all Americans are welcomed and valued and protected, especially those who live at the mercy of others.
President George Bush
The crime is complete, the deed is done, and the long battle is over. Terri Schiavo is dead.
Terris so-called wishes if she was ever dramatically injured only surfaced some seven years into her condition and after a malpractice suit had been settled. This endless mantra that death by dehydration was merely carrying out Terris wishes rings hollow when one looks at the evidence and once again common sense and rationality was the first casualty of the legal system.
In February 1990, a sudden loss of oxygen to the brain left Theresa Marie Schiavo in a coma and eventually in a profoundly incapacitated state. Terri's husband, Michael Schiavo, took care of her, working alongside Terri's parents. He took her to numerous doctors; he pursued experimental treatments; he sought at least some modest restoration of her self-awareness. In November 1992, he testified at a malpractice hearing that he would care for Terri for the rest of her life, that he "wouldn't trade her for the world," that he was going to nursing school to become a better caregiver. He explicitly reaffirmed his marriage vow, "through sickness, in health."
When one doctor suggested that he remove Terris feeding tube he replied that I couldn't do that to Terri," and let her die of dehydration. Yet by 1993 such sentiments increasingly fell by the wayside as Michaels interests focused elsewhere. He was moving on and his brain damaged wife was becoming a mere problem and inconvenient tie to the past.
If my wife was in such a state I would allow physical therapy. I would want her to go outside in the sunshine and to receive friends and flowers. I would want her to have her teeth cleaned and life threatening infections treated. I would allow pet therapy and for the blinds to be opened in her room. Even if she had told me she wanted no exceptional medical measures taken, I would make sure her existence while she was still alive was as pleasant and comfortable as possible. Common sense and natural compassion call for such simple measures yet these were the things that Michael denied Terri for many years.
Are these the actions of a man who deeply loved his wife and unselfishly wanted only to fulfill her wishes? No one would wish for themselves and their family to be treated that way. These are the actions of a man who I wouldnt trust to water the houseplants over the weekend or feed the family pet, let alone make the ultimate decision whether I lived or died.
If any of us had treated a dog, cat or even an iguana the way Terri has been treated we would have been arrested and prosecuted by the same system that provided the legal cover and protection for Michael to deprive, mistreat, and eventually kill his wife. Terri was not a piece of unwelcome human debris to be hidden away in a darkened room barred from even the light of day or killed so that another could marry the mother of his children and move on with his life.
Regarding Terris care, Michael Schiavo once said: "How the hell should I know we never spoke about this, my God I was only 25 years old. How the hell should I know? We were young. We never spoke of this." (Michael Schiavos former girl friend Cindy Shook in a May 8, 2001 Deposition.)
Some have argued that it is not about the right to die, that it is about the right to kill. Perhaps just a small matter of semantics, but more likely a significant difference in how one views the sanctity of human life. There is a distinct line between letting someone go and wanting to see them go and the cheerleading for the death of this brave woman with the tremendous will to live has finally been overcome by those with the tremendous will to see her die. She talked (a few words), she felt pain, she responded to commands, she laughed, she cried, and she brought joy to those around her.
Because of a court order Terri died at the command of the husband she feared and was preparing to leave. Its sad to see a struggle in our culture and our society between those who seek a culture of life and those who vigorously champion the acceptance and advocacy of a culture of death. The secularists and the Christians. The Right to Life versus the Duty to Die. The representative branch versus the judicial branch. A society torn apart on such basic fundamental rights as human dignity, the sacredness of human life and the worthiness of those less perfect than the rest of us.
Is she just the latest sacrifice on the blood splattered altar of convenience or a woman finally being granted her ultimate wish? Unfortunately, we will never know in this lifetime what she truly wanted and whether she wanted to leave her family who loved her and fought for her dignity, care, and finally her life. The love and devotion of such a family is a rare treasure to be cherished. She will be missed by those who loved and cared for her and her courage, and the courage of those who fought for her life, will be an inspiration for many others.
Thursday morning, as Terri was in her final hours of life, police prohibited any blood relatives from spending time with her. O'Donnell, one of the family's spiritual advisers, said that her parents and siblings were "begging to be at her bedside but they were denied. In one final act of cruelty at the end, Terris parents were not allowed to be with their daughter as she died.
Terri was cremated against her familys wishes, and her remains will be tucked away in her husbands family crypt far removed from the ever faithful family who fought for her until the bitter end. The cruelty exhibited by Michael Schiavo to Terris parents continued to the very end and now even beyond her death. Though we will never know Terris true wishes as to whether she would have wanted to die this way, we do know for certain that Terri would have never wanted Michael to be so mean and cruel to her parents, and make them suffer like this.
The nationwide debate has not ended with Terris passing but has just begun. Political blood will be shed and with both barrels blasting the various sides will begin the long battle over whether we are a culture of life or a culture of expediency with a duty to die once we are not productive. Fascist regimes glorify the killing of the weak, the disabled, the helpless and useless eaters that exist among us, not a civilized Western society with a heart of compassion.
Though technically not killed by the state, it was the state that allowed her to be killed by another. It was the state that failed to protect a helpless woman from a man who has shown his cruel and uncaring character time and time again. It was Terri, and those who need our protection and care the most, that was failed by the state and its cold laws that were not tempered by mercy. Michael Schiavo failed her, the courts failed her, our laws failed her, and ultimately we as a society failed her, for we allowed our culture to become one that would allow this to happen. "Dasein Ohne Leben", the Nazi idea of "Existence without life", must not be enshrined in law as an excuse for euthanasia.
Though I believe she was welcomed with open arms into the presence of the Lord, my family and I grieve her passing and empathize with the pain her parents are experiencing at the loss of their firstborn daughter. Death of a loved one is never easy, but we, and they, do not mourn as those who have no hope. God Bless you Terri, you will be missed and remembered.
........"Mrs. Schiavo's death is a moral poverty and a legal tragedy. This loss happened because our legal system did not protect the people who need protection most, and that will change. The time will come for the men responsible for this to answer for their behavior, but not today. Today we grieve, we pray, and we hope to God this fate never befalls another. Our thoughts and prayers are with the Schindlers and with Terri Schiavo's friends in this time of deep sorrow." Congressman Tom DeLay.
Thank you for the post!
They do indeed. Where was the most powerful man on earth when Terri Schiavo needed him most?
"[Nancy Cruzan, three days before her death from starvation] turned and looked at me and stared at me with a panicky look, sweating profusely, and the thought I had was, she was thinking, Oh, heres a policeman, hell help me. But we werent allowed to do that,...Doug Seneker
In this good article, this is a major flaw. So, I'll rewrite the sentence for David:
*** In February 1990, a sudden loss of oxygen to the brain left Theresa Marie Schindler (/schiavo) in a brief coma that lasted for several weeks. After several weeks, Terri awoke from the coma and was in a profoundly incapacitated state. ***
I just quickly went through the Terri's Fight Site to see if I could find mention of the coma - I didn't find it. In the last six weeks, I remember reading on Terri's website or elsewhere, that after the incident in Feb 1990, Terri was in a coma for several weeks. But she awoke / or was awaken from that coma after a few weeks.
And, it's too bad this article starts and ends with quotes from leaders who had strong words, but not enough action to save Terri.
"The time will come for the men responsible for this to answer for their behavior, but not today." Tom Delay.
Someone pinch me, I'm having a bad dream and can't wake up! In my dream, an innocent handicapped woman was sentenced to death by starvation, as each day passed the men with the power to save her all said they would do something tomorrow, but tomorrow never came. For 13 days this woman suffered publicly, while her family pleaded for her life, for the government to spare her from this cruel death sentence. Their cries went on deaf ears and others just simply turned their back and said there is nothing more I can do, it's the law and we can't go against the law.
The whole world watched day by day, as this innocent woman who had been locked in a room, without so much as having her teeth cleaned for 5 years, was cruelly being starved to death, per order of The United States of America. This order came not from her husband or his lawyer, but from the government itself. In one fell swoop, the government now decides who lives or dies, innocent or guilty no longer matters. The government now decides who is worthy of life and who is not.
"The time will come for the men responsible for this to answer for their behavior, but not today." or tomorrow or the next. It will never come, at least on this earth, because just in recent history those responsible for the most heinous crimes against the public have not been held accountable, but lauded as heroes and promoted to higher positions within our own government. We all know it and yet as a public, we still vote into office these same self serving men and woman. Have we not learned to judge a man by his actions or lack of actions, rather than what he says. Just as President Bush said after the death of this innocent woman, "the strong must protect the weak" almost made me vomit! He, the most powerful man on the face of the earth, did nothing to stop this public execution. I am no longer blinded by his words and see him for the first time, for what he is. May God have mercy on us all, because we all bear a responsibity to this womans death.
Sorry for the mistake quote. It should have been:
"strong have a duty to protect the weak."
"Though technically not killed by the state" Tom Delay.
What planet is this guy from? Perhaps it was Bozo the Clown who ordered her death by starvation to include not feeding her by mouth?
I disagree. I will in no way accept any "responsibility" for her death. Universal blame for this is codswallop IMHO.
Not enough action is right. What a travesty!!!
I missed that. You're absolutely correct.
Agreed. Many of us did whatever was in our power to do and if we had the power to do it, we would have gone in and gotten her OUT OF THERE!
Very much agreed. Well said The presidents words rang hollow. I feel no more enthusiasm for either Bush. In the end, they both backed off.
"I disagree. I will in no way accept any "responsibility" for her death. Universal blame for this is codswallop IMHO."
Perhaps you missed the point. What I was trying to say is the following: As a nation we vote for people and continue to vote for people, who continue to do exactly the opposite of what they say. You know, like voting for politicians who make claims to follow the Constitution, to protect the Constitution and at every turn destroys or disregards it, and further when an innocent woman is publicly being tortured and murdered, they claim the law prevents them from doing anything. Did we not elect these same people? Do we not share as a nation in this shameful act, because we continue to vote into office these people over and over?
P.S. What the heck is "codswallop" anyways?
I voted for President Bush since Kerry was not even an option in my mind. Was there someone else on the ticket that had a chance of being elected? IMHO, President Bush did what he could. I don't fault him one bit. So no, I am not going to take responsibility for this one bit. In fact, even if either President or Governor Bush could have actually done something, I again still have no personal responsibility in this matter period!
P.S. What the heck is "codswallop" anyways?
Codswallop:
You should run for President!
Can't. I am a naturalized citizen.
I certainly describes the rant.
Not sure what you mean here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.