Posted on 01/26/2003 6:53:20 PM PST by TonyTheTigger
To: president@whitehouse.gov; vice.president@whitehouse.gov Subject: Email President Bush and confront him about his stand for homosexuals
Dear Mr. President this is what the web page seen by millions will say. I also have a rather large size mailing list I will send this out to.
Email President Bush and confront him about his stand for homosexuals
To: president@whitehouse.gov, vice.president@whitehouse.gov
You will not receive my vote and I will make web pages after web pages exposing you for the fence straddling liar you have become. Ignore this if you want.... I will make good on what I promised you.
If this story is false I will not do what I have said. If I get no response I will take it to mean your guilty.
Bush White House, Clinton White House ... No Difference on Homosexuality
News from Agape Press
http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/1/242003b.asp
A former voter for you,
Tony Horton
I agree but unfortunately he’d get tagged as a homophobe.
You are correct. That is my opinion.
Hehehe ;)
Have you applied to be accepted by the Log Cabin ? I guess in your state of --------------- I replied to the wrong person like you did . You are forgiven .
I love that scene between Cruise and Moore.
Well, look at the first response,it probably knocked the pins out from under him.I would have felt personally attacked and I think Tony got discombobulated and while he did try to bring more information to the threads,very few people were willing to stay on point.And,he got more and more excited and accusatory.
The thread deteriorated to posters defending Bush and some constitutional references to rights and a lot of back and forth about religious denominations.
I am somewhat in agreement with those of you who said you could not judge Bush's commitment to conservatism based on his spokesperson's statement about his distancing himself from Thacker's statement about the "Gay Plague",I found in the other information a clear commitment to things ordinarily not espoused by conservatives.For ezample Fleisher said "The President's view is people with AIDS need to be treated with care,compassion and that's why his budget has provided so much money to help in the fight against AIDS"
Then if you read Remedy's post and other posts about the money dedicated to research and education and factor in the skyrocketing insurance costs now that so many government and private sector employers are paying for partners maybe you will see what Tony saw.Follow the money and connect dots. Things are a mess.
Where do you get your info? Biker bars?
You'll be surprised to learn they actually have cement buildings in Africa, and toilets, and hospitals, and families, and televisions, and HIV tests.
Here's an interesting statistic from the CDC that I haven't found an explanation for:
Take two junkies, one black and one white. Identical socio-economic backgrounds, same age, same health...everything equal, except one is black and one is white. The black junkie is 14 times as likely to contract AIDS as the white junkie.
14 times.
As far as medical stats go, that's astounding.
But we're not supposed to think about it; certainly not bleed over it, as you caution me. Because if we were, we'd see the dying faces of millions of black children on network news every night.
Instead, we watch "Survivor."
Prayers for the President's strength and stamina, and for the safety of all our own.
There it is Sardippity...in its entirety.
There's nothing in there about Thacker. There's nothing in there really except. "Petition Pres. Bush and say 'You lose my support because of your SUPPORT for homosexuality.'"
Many asked where he was coming from. Instead of answers from Tony they got zinged by Tony. It was a simple request. They wanted him to build his case. They wanted to hear the limits of his idea in terms of dealing with other free Americans.
HIV test[s] are too expensive for the WHO to administer to every suspected patient. Instead the WHO has the following diagnostic policy
”AIDS in Africa was defined by the World Health Organization in their Banguie meeting as a combination of fever, persistent cough, diarrhea, and a 10% loss of body weight in two months. No HIV or any other test is required. “
Notwithstanding, unlike the West, in Africa AIDS is diagnosed without any laboratory tests, patients are classified as AIDS cases without laboratory proof that they have either immunodeficiency or HIV infection. All Africans need to have are various clinical conditions. But the conditions accepted as forming the "S" (syndrome) of "AIDS" in Africa bear no relationship to AIDS in the West.I don't find any compelling reason to believe that HIV has a true affinity only for blacks and sodomites. But I do know there is a lot of money and politics involved in maintaining the notion of a heterosexual AIDS crisis in Africa. But there is no actual proof of this in Africa. Even if there were, no one has demonstrated that the transmission was by normal heterosexual means.
In the West, AIDS consists of a person's having one or more of approximately 27 relatively rare diseases. In Africa, AIDS as defined by the World Health Organisation 1986/87 Bangui African AIDS definition is no more than a collage of common non-specific symptoms and signs such as cough, fever and diarrhoea, and a few diseases such as tuberculosis (TB) and a cancer called Kaposi's sarcoma, diseases which have been endemic in Africa for generations.
The latest answer why black Africa is "killing itself" is apparently now the "misreporting of actual cases." All those millions of deaths, from what?
Something has dropped life expectancy from 70 to 45 in a decade. In the last 25 years, have Africans suddenly stopped a particuar practice or started some habit, unknown before 1976? What is the differential that explains why almost 50 percent of the continent will die off in the next 10 years? Not having enough proper test kits does not explain the ungodly surge in deaths.
Are these numbers not so staggering that you feel compelled to understand them better, as a human being?
Remember, my question about the black and white junkies pertains only to the U.S. We have all means of diagnostic testing available here. What's your explanation for the statistical discrepancy between control groups of black and white junkies?
It's a question worthy of consideration. Any of us with time enough to debate eschatology on the internet probably has the time to do a little reading on this subject...from a variety of sources.
It's all about the numbers.
Why bring this into it? Are the numbers themselves not enough to question?
Those are Eisenhower's words; not mine.
Tony was unkind, viscious, ignorant, and inarticulate. - Other than that, he was a fine freeper in the tradition of MOJO ;o)
Incidentally,I take threads off point myself since I am too cowardly and/or dumb and/or lazy to post a vanity or to post an article for discussion.Because of my own shortcomings,I admire people who try.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.