Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Email President Bush and confront him about his stand for homosexuals
Agape press ^ | 1/26/03 | Tony Horton

Posted on 01/26/2003 6:53:20 PM PST by TonyTheTigger

To: president@whitehouse.gov; vice.president@whitehouse.gov Subject: Email President Bush and confront him about his stand for homosexuals

Dear Mr. President this is what the web page seen by millions will say. I also have a rather large size mailing list I will send this out to.

Email President Bush and confront him about his stand for homosexuals

To: president@whitehouse.gov, vice.president@whitehouse.gov

You will not receive my vote and I will make web pages after web pages exposing you for the fence straddling liar you have become. Ignore this if you want.... I will make good on what I promised you.

If this story is false I will not do what I have said. If I get no response I will take it to mean your guilty.

Bush White House, Clinton White House ... No Difference on Homosexuality

News from Agape Press

http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/1/242003b.asp

A former voter for you,

Tony Horton


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: homosexuality
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 361-366 next last
To: CindyDawg
It was a knockdown, dragout for a while.

Fireworks, big guns, etc.

Where were you when I needed you??!! :>)

X
241 posted on 01/28/2003 8:02:51 PM PST by xzins (Prepare Ye the way of the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Other than that he had some decent data IF he'd just stated it and supported it....without the disruptor style trash.

I can’t claim to have read all his posts but I never got the feeling he was a “disrupter”? Is fighting the homosexual agenda not a conservative ideal anymore?

242 posted on 01/28/2003 8:22:09 PM PST by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I noticed on the thread which was pulled and also caused Tony;s removal that he said he had left the homosexual life about seven years ago. His zeal and fervor may have been caused by a complex of matters related to that,he indicated that in finding Christ he was able to leave that life behind.

He had a mission,his data was good,the conclusions he drew were not without merit and those of you who attacked him should have a little talk with God tonight and hope that He forgives you and pray for Tony. Many of you were unkind if not vicious.

243 posted on 01/28/2003 8:36:35 PM PST by saradippity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks; angelo
I'm not gonna argue with you because angelo thinks the guy was just lacking in people skills and bit of a numbnutz.

I was after him for being coy about his own beliefs while trashing mine.

Then he started throwing "you're a homosexual" charges out at everyone around who asked him anything.

But the banning didn't take place from this forum. I have no idea what he did over on news/activism. Whatever it was it labeled him as "troll" to the Admin Moderator and he got kicked.

Definition of troll, as I now understand it, is simply someone who'll say anything just to stir up hyper-reactivity.
244 posted on 01/28/2003 8:37:31 PM PST by xzins (Prepare Ye the way of the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
Yow! You know this appeasing hate-America idiot?

Not really, but he’s ma’ Bishop like it or not. Hope he’s better than the anti-homophobia sermonizing Bishop Suffragan Jane Dixon. Anglicans are left with so few options anymore, the majority is soooo liberal.

Schism!

245 posted on 01/28/2003 8:39:27 PM PST by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: saradippity
and those of you who attacked him should have a little talk with God tonight and hope that He forgives you and pray for Tony.

Sara, read through this entire thread. We were asking him perfectly reasonable questions about his statements, just looking for him to clarify and substantiate them. Rather than replying substantively, he began accusing everyone here of being Clintonian, gameplaying homosexuals.

And this was to people who are sympathetic to his beliefs. I'd say Tony burned his own bridges.

246 posted on 01/28/2003 8:41:52 PM PST by malakhi (fundamentalist unitarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: saradippity
I don't buy what you're selling saradippity. Go to #244 and read what happened.

Reread this entire thread.

Tony can come back under another name in the future and understand some things that might make it possible for him to hang on a bit longer.

I actually liked his data and have posted pretty much the same stuff myself in the past. That wasn't the issue.

He wouldn't engage....he's just call silly names.
247 posted on 01/28/2003 8:44:24 PM PST by xzins (Prepare Ye the way of the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Yeah, I never saw the “say anything” part, I generally support anyone coming out of homosexuality and advocating against the behavior. Too bad for him…I hope he finds another vehicle for his mission.
248 posted on 01/28/2003 8:45:04 PM PST by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: xzins
BRB
249 posted on 01/28/2003 8:45:22 PM PST by SpookBrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
He just needs to wait a day or two and come back under a different email.....and quit being a nitwit in how he treats people would be a nice change, too.
250 posted on 01/28/2003 8:51:01 PM PST by xzins (Prepare Ye the way of the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
I guess you'll never know since you don't plan on reading the book.

I'm well-acquainted with the theory. But there are a lot of wacky AIDS conspiracy stuff going back to the Eighties. No one has any undeniable proof. You'll find there are web sites that have promoted the same ideas for a number of years. They don't have any proof either.

Even if it were true, what difference does it make to people who are sick now and who have yet to catch it?
251 posted on 01/28/2003 8:55:25 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
Not really, but he’s ma’ Bishop like it or not. Hope he’s better than the anti-homophobia sermonizing Bishop Suffragan Jane Dixon. Anglicans are left with so few options anymore, the majority is soooo liberal. Schism!

I recalled your bishopette from other remarks you'd made and the fight you had with it. I'd wondered a few times how that spat turned out. What a witch.

Now I'm a little embarassed because lately I've been starting to think that the Southern Baptists might be getting a little liberal on inerrancy of scripture. By comparison with you, I don't have a lot to complain about.
252 posted on 01/28/2003 8:59:13 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Don't waste your time bleeding about AIDS in Africa. It is just an oppurtunity to do some more social engineering. I just read an article called "The Emperor's Juju",by G. Michael Jones which repeats what I have learned over the last several years about the subject.

"On the first day of January 1993,the number of AIDS patients almost doubled,not because the victims failed to use condoms but because the CDC simply redefined the disease including cervical cancer,something more skeptical observers saw as a way of expanding the number of women who had the disease.------------------Since no HIV test is necessary to define the disease in Africa everyone with TB in 1993 now had AIDS".

Notice that there is no HIV test available in Africa,they use descriptions of the disease causing the death to diagnose it. Since most poverty related diseases have symptoms similar to those exhibited by AIDS patients you have a perfect situation to use for multiple purposes.

253 posted on 01/28/2003 9:00:53 PM PST by saradippity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I actually liked his data and have posted pretty much the same stuff myself in the past. That wasn't the issue. He wouldn't engage....he's just call silly names.

I'm sure others wrote him a note just as I did. He seemed to think he'd wandered into a hotbed of sodomy or something when the case is about as opposite as it can be.

Maybe he'll come back and lurk for a while and figure out who is who and where they stand before he attacks.
254 posted on 01/28/2003 9:01:37 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Preach it Bro. Z!

255 posted on 01/28/2003 9:02:50 PM PST by snerkel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: saradippity
Notice that there is no HIV test available in Africa,they use descriptions of the disease causing the death to diagnose it. Since most poverty related diseases have symptoms similar to those exhibited by AIDS patients you have a perfect situation to use for multiple purposes.

Exactly. We've had threads on this before. Maybe I'll have to go do some digging to see if there's any new research on the matter.
256 posted on 01/28/2003 9:05:38 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: saradippity; Clint N. Suhks; George W. Bush; Dr. Eckleburg; MeeknMing
Awesome opportunity for Bush's Aids in Africa initiative, then.

Just bring in some HIV lab tests and AIDS rates will absolutely plummet. At the same time GW gets the credit. And...there's the opportunity to help those who really have the disease.

257 posted on 01/28/2003 9:12:37 PM PST by xzins (Prepare Ye the way of the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I believe you are a Christian, even though you are a Methodist. HA! How's that for an answer?

I'm tired. I'll be back tomorrow to answer you. (((hugs))) to you my cold Yankee friend. Come to Florida for the winter.

258 posted on 01/28/2003 9:14:17 PM PST by SpookBrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
Now I'm a little embarassed because lately I've been starting to think that the Southern Baptists might be getting a little liberal on inerrancy of scripture.

WOW, my best buddy, a Southern Baptist, is a little right of you, I’ll ask him if he’s seeing the same.

259 posted on 01/28/2003 9:14:49 PM PST by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: SpookBrat; saradippity; Clint N. Suhks; George W. Bush; Dr. Eckleburg; MeeknMing
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/backroom/830135/posts?page=258#258

See spook's response. She's a Church of Christ (I think) as was Tony and MeekMom. It seems they do believe that salvation is by grace through faith and NOT by denomination.
260 posted on 01/28/2003 9:17:20 PM PST by xzins (Prepare Ye the way of the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 361-366 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson