"On the first day of January 1993,the number of AIDS patients almost doubled,not because the victims failed to use condoms but because the CDC simply redefined the disease including cervical cancer,something more skeptical observers saw as a way of expanding the number of women who had the disease.------------------Since no HIV test is necessary to define the disease in Africa everyone with TB in 1993 now had AIDS".
Notice that there is no HIV test available in Africa,they use descriptions of the disease causing the death to diagnose it. Since most poverty related diseases have symptoms similar to those exhibited by AIDS patients you have a perfect situation to use for multiple purposes.
Where do you get your info? Biker bars?
You'll be surprised to learn they actually have cement buildings in Africa, and toilets, and hospitals, and families, and televisions, and HIV tests.
Here's an interesting statistic from the CDC that I haven't found an explanation for:
Take two junkies, one black and one white. Identical socio-economic backgrounds, same age, same health...everything equal, except one is black and one is white. The black junkie is 14 times as likely to contract AIDS as the white junkie.
14 times.
As far as medical stats go, that's astounding.
But we're not supposed to think about it; certainly not bleed over it, as you caution me. Because if we were, we'd see the dying faces of millions of black children on network news every night.
Instead, we watch "Survivor."
Yep, you're onto the truth. - That is covered in detail in chapter 8 of Peter Duesberg's book "Inventing the AIDS Virus."
"Emerging Viruses..." is a B.S. scare-mongering book that is closer to being part of the problem than part of the solution. I had difficulty even finishing it because their agenda was showing through so clearly.