Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TALE OF TWO LAWERS (Feldmand vs. Dusek) DEFEATED and DECIETFUL.(VD's SKATE FREE TO SWING AGAIN)
Yahoo ^ | August 22, 2002 | Yahoo

Posted on 08/22/2002 11:32:19 PM PDT by FresnoDA

TALE OF TWO LAWYERS......

Defense lawyer Steven Feldman enters the Hall of Justice in San Diego Wednesday Aug. 21, 2002 to hear the verdict of his client David Westerfield. Westerfield was found guilty of kidnapping and murdering Danielle van Dam. (AP Photo/Ric Francis)Prosecutor Jeff Dusek enters the San Diego Hall of Justice Wednesday Aug. 21, 2002 to hear the verdict in the murder and kidnapping trial of David Westerfield.. Westerfield was found guilty of the kidnapping and murder of Danielle van Dam. (AP Photo/Ric Francis)

DEFEATED and DECIETFUL



TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: 180frank; assjackals; bleach; blood; bugs; childporn; childpornconsumer; drunk; fibers; fresnodamissya; guilty; hairs; horndog; knobs; lies; motorhome; mummification; prints; rapemovies; scratches; sweat; tears; truth; vandamswingers; westerfield; westerfieldrailroad
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 1,821-1,831 next last
To: MizSterious
Why didn't you TELL me that you are a "chap"???

I am so disillusioned.....
101 posted on 08/23/2002 9:13:46 AM PDT by Politicalmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Why didn't you TELL me that you are a "chap"???

I am so disillusioned.....
102 posted on 08/23/2002 9:13:46 AM PDT by Politicalmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: small_l_libertarian
According to Dusek, they don't have to say how, we just have to accept that he did it.

Now, there's a piece of work for you. And the jury apparently bought that argument.

103 posted on 08/23/2002 9:15:11 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Miz??? GOT AIM??? FresnoDA
104 posted on 08/23/2002 9:15:28 AM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
Hildy can't tell the difference. That tells us a lot about Hildy right there. (My husband would be tremendously disappointed, also!)
105 posted on 08/23/2002 9:16:12 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: All; FresnoDA
If you haven't done so already, be sure to check the "keywords" at the top of the thread. Fresno, ya dun good! (but no iced tea spew alert, wahhh!)
106 posted on 08/23/2002 9:17:48 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
Maybe our threads could be written up like this: The Westerfield Case, August 23rd, 2002. Then followed by a list of the facts and our explanations. Any jackel that appears could then be pointed to the list. What do you think?
107 posted on 08/23/2002 9:19:01 AM PDT by Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
I just couldn't resist adding "knobs"....
108 posted on 08/23/2002 9:20:57 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: small_l_libertarian
Um, you forgot that he stayed INSIDE the house for over an hour, too and left NO TRACE, or SCENT.

The verdict served to reinforce what some think of the Left Coast. M'apologies to those of you who are forced to live there.
109 posted on 08/23/2002 9:22:54 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: All
Defense lawyer Steven Feldman has asked for a "Phillips hearing" to try to keep evidence from being presented to the jury.

A Phillips hearing is held when prosecutors have evidence, such as police reports or witness testimony, of a separate criminal or violent act or threat of a violent act that occurred before the crime for which the defendant is now charged or convicted.

I can't believe the way you all ignore this important little tidbit. Better prepare to have your SaveDave delusions shattered yet again.

110 posted on 08/23/2002 9:24:35 AM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
You are LYING. There were about 87 "questionable" pics.

Was it determined how many of these were DELETED? I know some of them were. Isn't it scary that you can delete files from your computer, they remain on your harddrive and you are fried for it!

111 posted on 08/23/2002 9:26:10 AM PDT by kayti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
I believe it's closed. It a "Phillips Hearing". Admissability/ relevance of witnesses in the penalty phase.
112 posted on 08/23/2002 9:26:36 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1
Personally, I can't believe you're still trolling. Are you and Hildy obsessed with us? Can't get us out of your minds? Maybe you need counseling?
113 posted on 08/23/2002 9:26:43 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
Ahh, thank you. I can turn off Court TV then. Hate that channel.
114 posted on 08/23/2002 9:27:45 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1
I can't believe the way you all ignore this important little tidbit. Better prepare to have your SaveDave delusions shattered yet again.

Think we're just waiting for the FACTS to be presented. Not rushing to judgment becausing a hearing is happening, like some.

115 posted on 08/23/2002 9:29:13 AM PDT by kayti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom; ~Kim4VRWC's~; MizSterious; All

OFFICIAL THREADJACKAL

SMOKEY ROOM WARNING

If you have surfed to this thread by accident, please
be advised that all posts are operating under the Free Republic
SMOKE FILLED ROOM Rules Of Engagement.

No Profanity,

No Racism,

No Violence....

OTHERWISE!!!!


YOU JACKALS ARE FLEA INFESTED CROOKED TOOTHED SWING VOTERS.....


116 posted on 08/23/2002 9:33:22 AM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: small_l_libertarian
I actually do have a scenario in my mind. Here goes: Westerfield, by his own admission, was drunk. The prosecution touched on him having a drinking problem. (I think the Prosecution wanted to stay away from this if they could to avoid later penalty problems). I know something about alcoholics. I am a recovering one. Westerfield had been scorned at the bar by these women. He was still reeling by Susan, who had broken up with him earlier (Apparently. it had something to do with his drinking). He had this child sex fantasy thing. Up until that moment, it was just a fantasy. I think DW was in a blackout or semi-blackout or just blindly drunk. He wondered over to the VD home thinking he could see something or be invited to what he believed was going to be an orgy. When you are that drunk, believe me, even the most outrageous thing seems reasonable to you. I think somehow Danielle was awoken and wondered downstairs and when not seeing anyone around, wondered outside through the open door. I think it was a snap decision for Westerfield, a crime of opportunity, unplanned. He saw her, he grabbed her and the rest is history.
117 posted on 08/23/2002 9:34:35 AM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: kayti
Kayti, Val's idol (idle?), Beth Karas just said that past violent crimes could be one of the things brought up in this hearing, not that it was the topic of this hearing. So we'll wait and see--Val has been (very) wrong before, like her many claims about "police procedures"--most of which were not followed in this case. (And it's been verified that they weren't.)
118 posted on 08/23/2002 9:36:45 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
< I know something about alcoholics. I am a recovering one. /I>

From your posts this morning.... don't think you've quite made it there yet.

119 posted on 08/23/2002 9:38:32 AM PDT by kayti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
When he grabbed her....where did he take her?

Not clear on how the multi colored fibers found on her body and the red fibers found under her nails, were not found in the SUV, his house or the MH?

How did he keep her hair from being anywhere in the MH but the sink drain trap, along with other blonde hairs, not hers?

120 posted on 08/23/2002 9:39:09 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 1,821-1,831 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson