Posted on 02/23/2010 8:02:16 AM PST by butterdezillion
I've updated my blog to include the e-mail from Janice Okubo confirming that they assign birth certificate numbers in the state registrar's office and the day they do that is the "Date filed by state registrar".
The pertinent portion from Okubo's e-mail:
In regards to the terms “date accepted” and “date filed” on a Hawaii birth certificate, the department has no records that define these terms. Historically, the terms “Date accepted by the State Registrar” and “Date filed by the State Registrar” referred to the date a record was received in a Department of Health office (on the island of O’ahu or on the neighbor islands of Kaua’i, Hawai’i, Maui, Moloka’i, or Lana’i), and the date a file number was placed on a record (only done in the main office located on the island of O’ahu) respectively.
MY SUMMARY: As you can see, Okubo said that the “Date filed by the State Registrar” is the date a file number was placed on a record (only done in the main office).
There are no pre-numbered certificates. A certificate given a certificate number on Aug 8th (Obama’s Factcheck COLB) would not be given a later number than a certificate given a number on Aug 11th (the Nordyke certificates).
There is no way that both the date filed and the certificate number can be correct on the Factcheck COLB. The COLB is thus proven to be a forgery.
Not necessarily. If he is an illegitimate office holder, with no rights to hold said office in the first place, he could be removed without impeachment and Senate trial.
He is Wigout, I’m sure.
A fraud, just like his master.
They’re swapping handles.
Multiple people using the same handles, or at least it sure sounds like it.
No it does not.
If he is not eligible, he is NOT the holder of the office PERIOD.
And it then is not in Congress hands to remove him.
You sure like to chase your own tail don’t you?
If I threw a stick, would you chase that?
Keep in mind he only showed up to answer questions about the BC he says he forged. We don't even know if it's really that person. Anyway, he answered the questions. And he's still posting.
Would you care to show me that provision in the Constitution?
Red Steel:
Would you care to show me where in the Constitution where it says someone who is not a natural born citizen qualifies to be president?
touche.
LOL!
I’ve seen rubber bands sharper than their minds.
There are rocks and dog stuffing more intelligent than the trolls.
And he holds that office until such time as he may be removed by way of impeachment and subsequent conviction by Congress.
And that may happen sooner than you think!
He’s also a stupid a**hole.
Uncontrolled anger makes people stupid.
I hate trolls like him.
I really do.
You can respond to that, but you cannot answer this question:
“Michael Michael was Steve Eddy. “
HOW DO YOU KNOW THIS, SIR?
“Ender was not Michael Michael.”
And HOW do you know THAT?
So who is he?
And why should we believe YOU?
A putative president would not need to be impeached by Congress for removal from office.
Rephrase.
A putative president [ found not eligible ] would not need to be impeached by Congress to be removed from office.
Yes he could.
What happens to someone who is ineligible for an office?
They get removed without review.
You said: “Michael Michael was Steve Eddy. “
HOW DO YOU KNOW THIS, SIR?
“Ender was not Michael Michael.”
And HOW do you know THAT?
So who is he?
And why should we believe YOU?
Have you ever heard of Quo Warranto?
Quo Warranto
The common law writ of quo warranto has been suppressed at the federal level in the United States, and deprecated at the state level, but remains a right under the Ninth Amendment which was understood and presumed by the Founders, and which affords the only judicial remedy for violations of the Constitution by public officials and agents. Here are a few writings on the subject. Revival of the writs must be combined with reviving standing for private prosecution of public rights, subverted by the decision in Frothingham v. Mellon, 262 U.S. 447 (1923), which is discussed in an article by Steve Winter, The Metaphor of Standing and the Problem of Self-Governance.
If he doesn’t hold office legitimately, the Constitutional provisions do not apply as he is NOT the President.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.