Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $17,324
21%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 21%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Posts by Tancred

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Barack Obama? Not bothered... Schoolgirl left wondering what all the fuss is about

    04/03/2010 12:08:00 PM PDT · 30 of 30
    Tancred to Free ThinkerNY

    I was outside the Portland Expo when the President came. About 2,000 people got tickets to go inside to hear him speak, some standing in line for over twelve hours. About 200 couldn’t get in even though they had tickets (they handed out more than were seats available, not expecting some people to show up. But all who had tickets did so anyway).

    The area outside was very different because of the Presidential visit. A Coast Guard chopper was circling overhead. At the fire station up the street, there were vehicles parked outside ready to respond, along with a couple Maine State Police tactical units. All of Park Avenue, which runs along the Expo building was blocked off, with traffic also blocked where Deering Avenue intersects Park. It’s basically a straight run from the Portland Jetport to the Expo Building. Portland Police lined the street on Park from around Weymouth to St. John Street. They had the K-9 units there, too, along with guys in suits who were obviously Secret Service (outside of Portland’s downtown business district and the universities, no one wears a suit).

    There were between 300 and 400 people outside the area. The Obama supporters were in a bunch that occupied the middle of Park by Weymouth. The Obama protesters were in a bunch that was at right angles to them, going from Weymouth on down the street (that’s the highest point, as the street slopes down a bit until you reach St. John).

    Of the total crowd outside, about 60% were Obama supporters and about 40% were protesters. The protesters were very visible with lots of signs and the “Don’t Tread on Me” flags. I walked down from the top of the street, to where the crowd started to thin out. That turned out to be the right thing to do.

    About 3:10 or so, the Presidential motorcade came tearing up the street. Obama was in the second limo, with several big black SUVs and police cars surrounding him. The limo had to slow down to turn left into the Expo building, which was right where I was. I took some pictures and saw him wave to the people on the street. The crowd was very thin where I was (most were at the top of the street). The only protest sign that happened to be there was from a young guy who wanted to legalize marijuana. Two young Somali women in traditional dress were to my immediate left, and they were positioned just right to see the most of the President as his limo slowed down to turn into the building.

    The women were smiling and giggling because they had seen the President and he had waved at them. The limo went straight into the Expo building, and we never saw him get out. Of the crowd overall, everyone was pleasant and friendly. It was a nice sunny day after two days of solid rain, and everyone was excited to see a President come to our small state (even if you didn’t care for his policies).

    Maine is a state that will tend to support Obama, obviously. Maine is about 95% white, but the composition of the crowd outside was a little different, just because of where the Expo is located. Park Avenue and the neighborhood around it has many older buildings, the kind that are three stories or so and divided into multiple apartments. So that area is home to many recent immigrants; those I saw were mostly African or Somalian, with a couple of Mexicans. Naturally, since they lived right there, they just had to step outside to see the event.

    Of the Obama supporters, they mostly had signs that were of the “Yes We Can” type (possibly 2008 left-overs), and a few more with ones thanking him for health-care and a couple others that advocated immigration reform (held up by some SE-Asian people). The Obama protesters had more signs and were more visible, but they were still of fewer numbers than the supporters (but likely were more energetic).

    Everyone knew the President was going to be there for only an hour or so. About 4:00, the Obama protesters moved down the street from Weymouth to the intersection at St. John. That way, he would be sure to see their signs on the way out (unlike the route he took coming in). Around 4:10, we saw the Secret Service agents moving around, then five minutes later, the motorcade came out again. This time, since they did not have to slow down to turn, the motorcade got up to speed very quickly, just hauling ass out of town, with little chance to see anything of the President.

    It’s a straight run from there to the Jetport, and they obviously did that for routine security. At best, Obama would have only gotten a brief glimpse of a few protesters when he crossed St. John (at least they tried). The crowd of people broke up very quickly after that, with everyone heading home.

    Everyone was well-behaved; no incidents at all. I did see several of the small blue & white pro-Obama signs on the ground around the barricade area when I left. The only problem one person had was a lady in a blue sedan, who got into a car accident on Forest by Deering Park (a tricky place to drive at any time, but aggravated by the increased traffic). But I got a bunch of photos and I got to see the President drive by.

  • Federal Appeals Court: Driving With Money is a Crime

    08/21/2006 7:37:36 AM PDT · 157 of 408
    Tancred to TKDietz
    Hey everybody, please take a few minutes to read what the judges actually wrote on this case, not just what was reported in the article:

    http://www.thenewspaper.com/rlc/docs/2006/moneyseize.pdf

    Here's a revealing quote from the decision itself:

    Gonzolez purportedly carried $125,000 in cash with him on his flight, for the purpose of buying a truck that he had never seen, from a third party whom he had never met, with the help of a friend whose name he could not recall at trial.

    Folks, if you just take the time to look at the actual decision itself, you will find that it supports my initial suspicions that these guys were up to no good. I think that the court made the right decision on this one.

  • Federal Appeals Court: Driving With Money is a Crime

    08/21/2006 6:27:03 AM PDT · 151 of 408
    Tancred to pageonetoo
    It's people like you that become judges like this....I don't need to bring my "daddy" into the fray......Now socialist trolls felt everybody must be a drug dealer or other type criminal.....Of course, to you that is probably illegal or questionable, too!......Money talks and BS walks.....Better start walking!

    If you don't like this decision, then you are perfectly free to petition for a change in the law. For that matter, there is nothing stopping you from writing to the newspaper or protesting outside the courthouse.

    But it is extremely rude to make personal attacks on someone just because you're mad at how the judges ruled in this case & are not happy with this law.

    Throughout my posts on this topic, I have tried to argue how such a transaction could raise red flags in a reasonably-minded person. I have also tried to point out the hazards that may arise from such deals (such as the increased risk of theft, accidental loss, or damage to reputation if one party turns out to be not on the up-and-up).

    I like to think that I can present my points on a matter objectively and politely. Why is it that several other posters on this topic can't do the same? This is only one of two forums that I participate in on the Internet; on the other forum, posters refrain from personal attacks, apologize if they give offense (inadvertently or otherwise), and are kept in line by other posters & moderators. It's too bad the same can't happen here at Free Republic.

  • Federal Appeals Court: Driving With Money is a Crime

    08/20/2006 11:40:44 PM PDT · 99 of 408
    Tancred to biff
    You obviously have not been in the real world very long.

    I have been making reasonable arguments throughout, so please do me the courtesy of skipping the insults right now.

    Cash transactions are one thing when the amount is not excessively large and the parties that one is dealing with are well-known or otherwise have verifiable, established ties to the community or local area. As a businessman, you are putting yourself at potential risk in two ways if you deal with just any Johnny-out-of-town with a duffel bag full of cash: you could end up hurting your own reputation and you could end up with legal or bureaucratic hassle later on down the road. One is running the risk that the purchaser acquired that large amount of cash in some illegitimate way; why put your hard-earned reputation at risk for someone you don't know?

    Additionally, if word gets around that one deals with large amounts of cash, then that will increase one's risk for being a victim of either burglary or robbery. That seems like common sense; I'm surprised that no one has mentioned it before.

    I'm sure that any of us here at Free Republic could, if we were facing the possible loss of $125 grand, be able to satisfactorily demonstrate that we came by that money honestly. You may say that one shouldn't have to, but the fact is, that if such an amount was acquired legally, then one is certainly capable of demonstrating that. Since it appears that the men in this case did not do that, then it follows that they couldn't, and thus it is more than likely that such money was not acquired legally.

  • Federal Appeals Court: Driving With Money is a Crime

    08/20/2006 9:54:36 PM PDT · 43 of 408
    Tancred to eastforker
    Look at a bill, THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER FOR ALL DEBTS PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, nuff said!!

    It's not "nuff said" because if you ran a business where you sold commercial trucks that cost in the neighborhood of $100 grand to anyone who came in with a cooler full of cash the odds are that you would be dealing with criminals, gangsters, or persons who otherwise acquired that kind of cash by illegitimate means. I find it very hard to believe that anyone who ran a dealership would finalize a deal like that without telling the buyer to go to a bank first. You just would not want to accept that amount of cash no matter what was printed on the bills.

    Please, seriously, this is the real world, not some exercise in theoretical absolutisms. I stand by my assertion that there is something very suspicious with the behavior of the defendants, and likewise anyone who would deal with them with that amount of cash.

    My father ran a yacht brokerage (same idea as real estate, but with boats). Nobody would come into his office with a duffel bag full of cash and want to buy a boat. The idea is ridiculous, and anyone doing that would be shown to the door.

  • Federal Appeals Court: Driving With Money is a Crime

    08/20/2006 9:35:20 PM PDT · 26 of 408
    Tancred to FreedomCalls
    Associates of Gonzolez testified in court that they had pooled their life savings to purchase a refrigerated truck to start a produce business.

    Be that as it may, I find it hard to believe that they are telling the truth. How can they expect to run a business without first starting with a bank account, a cashier's check, anything but over $100 grand in a cooler? Who the heck buys a commercial truck with cash in the first place? We can all understand a few thousand in cash for a used car, but who makes deals like this in cash? Who would accept that kind of money in exchange for a truck anyway?

    I think there is more going on here than is presented in this article.

  • Hundreds protest N.J. immigration rules

    08/20/2006 8:59:41 PM PDT · 10 of 29
    Tancred to neverdem

    Real story should be local government enforces laws that the federal government won't. Real story should be small town in New Jersey is getting over-run by illegal aliens. Real story should be non-citizens have the gall to demand that they not have to obey the law or pay taxes.

    Instead we get this from the mainstream media.

  • Hundreds protest N.J. immigration rules

    08/20/2006 8:49:54 PM PDT · 7 of 29
    Tancred to neverdem
    Local officials estimate that as many as 3,500 illegal immigrants, many from Brazil, live in the town.

    A quick search for Riverside, NJ showed a population of just under 8,000 in the 2000 census. So if that information is correct, then how can anyone palusibly argue that we are not being invaded? That's nearly half the population! Maybe someone with local knowledge of the area can help me out; I've never been down that way.

  • (Israeli) Justice Minister to resign Sunday (Kissed female soldier)

    08/18/2006 6:19:17 PM PDT · 12 of 17
    Tancred to Alter Kaker

    I was looking at next year's calendars at Borders today. Too bad there isn't one for the Girls of the IDF.

  • Hawkish Gloom

    08/09/2006 10:28:00 AM PDT · 13 of 45
    Tancred to isaiah55version11_0
    Yikes indeed. How about this quote from NRO's The Corner by everyone's favorite Squidward, I mean pessimist, John Derbyshire (posted 8/9/06):

    Stanley Kurtz ROCKS. If you didn't read his "Hawkish Gloom" piece on yesterday's NRO (from which all the above quotes are taken), go read it now. Then, read it again. Read the links too.

    Stanley's notion of the Israelization of the West — the slow change of opinion here from deep dove-hawk, lib-con differences to a glum, grim, pessimistic consensus, is spot on.

    I only wonder — as of course I would — if Stanley is gloomy enough. There is a nightmare here, lurking just out of sight behind all the thoughts and articles of the gloomy-cons. The nightmare is so appalling to any civilized person I cannot bring myself to mention it. I'll just call it the g-word. Us or them. Please may it not come to that. I need a cup of coffee.

    It's coming up on five years since 9/11: Iran, Syria, and North Korea are still out there. Lots of people want to see the U.S. fail. It could be a long, hard war for years to come.

  • Speeder turns around to help trooper who crashed while chasing him

    08/06/2006 7:29:02 AM PDT · 18 of 36
    Tancred to dead

    Assuming everything in the article is true, I would hope that the trooper just let him off with a warning. Last time I drove through Montana (at night), my biggest concern was hitting a deer on the highway.

    Apropos of speeding, anyone have good suggestions for radar detectors? (They would at least let you know that the police are following you!)

  • Surgeons Fought For Hours To Save Castro's Life

    08/05/2006 6:36:07 PM PDT · 21 of 60
    Tancred to umgud
    Weekend at Bernie's?

    Yeah, great movie! I can just see them trying that...

  • Palestinians: Parliament speaker seized (by Israeli military)

    08/05/2006 5:41:11 PM PDT · 32 of 53
    Tancred to GodGunsGuts
    I say, open up the corridor to Jordan, and then you will have at least one Middle Eastern country (besides Israel) that wants the PLO destroyed.

    I misunderstood what you meant. I thought that you favored putting the Palestinians in the West Bank into Jordan in order that they would effectively become Jordanian citizens. This is what puzzled me about your earlier comments, since such an influx of radicals would hurt a fairly moderate, relatively decent country.

  • Palestinians: Parliament speaker seized (by Israeli military)

    08/05/2006 5:21:01 PM PDT · 29 of 53
    Tancred to GodGunsGuts

    You're correct in that there is no difference in ethnicity; however, there is a gulf between the two culturally & how they view themselves in nationalistic terms.

    One problem with the Palestinians is that they have been used too long as a "wedge" by other Arab & Middle Eastern nations to delegitimize, destabilize, or otherwise destroy Israel. The result is a Palestinian people that is radical, murderous, barbarous, and savage. No sane leader would want them added to his country's population. Unfortunately, none of the Middle Eastern countries or other liberal groups responsible for perpetuating the Palestinian "refugee" population will ever be held accountable for the damage they've done.

    In regards to current events, it may be interesting to look at Black September in Jordan in 1970 and the current war between Israel and Hezbollah today. See this link:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_September_in_Jordan

    When threatened with a Palestinian militant force that was intent on taking over the country in 1970, Jordan crushed the militants and drove them out. Today, in Lebanon, Hezbollah is essentially running the show in about half the country, and the gov't of Lebanon is either incapable or unwilling to exercise its authority.

  • Palestinians: Parliament speaker seized (by Israeli military)

    08/05/2006 3:37:36 PM PDT · 21 of 53
    Tancred to GodGunsGuts

    The problem with that is Jordan is relatively decent, as far as such places are in the Middle East, and I doubt that the Jordanians want much of anything to do with the Palestinians nowadays.

  • Australia plans floating prison ship (Australia cracks down on illegals)

    08/05/2006 9:38:44 AM PDT · 10 of 11
    Tancred to Extremely Extreme Extremist
    "This policy harks back to Australia's penal history, when we should be at the forefront of compassionate and human solutions to border issues," Greens Senator Kerry Nettle said in a statement

    There's this trouble with the compassionate approach--you let other people break your laws & ignore the sovereignty of your country and soon you don't have a country anymore.

  • We’re Losing World War IV ... How to get back to the road to victory.

    08/04/2006 8:25:01 AM PDT · 18 of 123
    Tancred to MNJohnnie
    Counter Insurgency is NOT Total War

    May I suggest that we look at the big picture, not just what is going on in Iraq, but what the people in the Islamic countries are doing? Every day they are engaged in spreading propaganda; supplying arms, intelligence, & funds to terrorist groups; demanding that Muslims in Western countries be accorded special status; encouraging non-assimilation, conversion, and growth of their own numbers; and very intent on acquiring nuclear weapons of their own. They are engaged in total war against us; it behooves us to take them seriously. They want to destroy us & they think they have a strategy that will work.

    It's past time to cut this Gordian knot & go after Iran.

  • Sen. Clinton Gets Face-Off With Rumsfeld

    08/03/2006 9:09:53 AM PDT · 22 of 58
    Tancred to presidio9
    "I for one am deeply disturbed at the failures, the constant, consistent failures of strategy with respect to Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere,"

    Okay, let's assume the current strategy is a failure in Iraq. That means a change of strategy, which boils down to two options: pull out of Iraq now or pound the daylights out of Iran and Syria (who are instigating & supporting the "insurgents.". What do you want to do, Hillary? Put up or shut up.

    Unfortunately, no major journalist (excepting a Brit Hume) would dare ask such a question of H.R. Clinton. How about this one, Hillary: "Do you want Iran to have nuclear weapons or do you want the U.S. to stop them (because no one else, especially your precious U.N. is going to)?"

    But no one holds liberal politicians accountable for their statements, and their constant criticism makes it so much harder for us to fight and win this war.

  • Whom among my fellow soldiers is willing to serve under the Israeli Defense forces?

    08/01/2006 6:16:33 PM PDT · 49 of 87
    Tancred to tricky_k_1972

    Some more links for those who wish to help out in some way:

    Twenty-Five Ways To Help Israel
    http://www.25waystohelpisrael.com/pages/t1.asp?PID=1000

    Shalom! Join Volunteers For Israel!
    http://www.vfi-usa.org/


  • Whom among my fellow soldiers is willing to serve under the Israeli Defense forces?

    08/01/2006 6:04:50 PM PDT · 47 of 87
    Tancred to AConnecticutYankee

    Since you and some others have expressed interest in doing what you can to help out, then please check out this link:

    http://www.sar-el.org/

    Apparently, it's a way for non-Israelis and non-Jews to help out in Israel by volunteering to work for several weeks in places like hospitals or army bases (doing the routine supply & maintenane work that frees up soldiers for other duties).

    I also came across this website that has a lot of links to other volunteer programs in Israel. Spend a little time and check them out; maybe you'll find something suitable.

    http://www.mahal2000.com/links/volunteer.htm