Keyword: homosexualagenda

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Gay Rights vs. Democracy

    05/20/2008 9:12:13 AM PDT · by porgygirl · 23 replies · 481+ views
    townhall.com ^ | 5/20 | Dinesh D'Souza
    Read the constitution, hold it up to the light, squeeze lemon juice on it--you won't see a right to gay marriage in there. It is simply not an enumerated right, nor is it a right that can be clearly derived from other enumerated rights.
  • Star Trek Star Boldly Goes Where Ellen Goes

    05/20/2008 3:01:45 AM PDT · by Berlin_Freeper · 46 replies · 1,277+ views
    E! Online/Yahoo News ^ | May 19, 2008 | Joal Ryan
    George Takei is going ring shopping. The Star Trek helmsman and his partner of 21 years, Brad Altman, are engaged to be married. "This is something we've been passionately committed to, so, no, there's no cold feet," Takei told E! News today. ...Altman proposed last Thursday, shortly after the California Supreme Court struck down a state law banning same-sex unions. Takei, who publicly came out in a magazine interview in 2005, announced his plans in a blog post Friday, the same day Ellen DeGeneres took to her talk show to announce her engagement to actress Portia de Rossi. Takei, 71,...
  • California Decision Will Radically Change Society (Why Same Sex Marriage Is Wrong Alert)

    05/19/2008 9:44:34 PM PDT · by goldstategop · 48 replies · 862+ views
    Townhall.com ^ | 5/20/2008 | Dennis Prager
    Americans seem mesmerized by the word "change." And, by golly, they sure got it last week from the California Supreme Court. It is difficult to imagine a single social change greater than redefining marriage from opposite sex to include members of the same sex. Nothing imaginable -- leftward or rightward -- would constitute as radical a change in the way society is structured as this redefining of marriage for the first time in history: Not another Prohibition, not government taking over all health care, not changing all public education to private schools, not America leaving the United Nations, not rescinding...
  • Mum man went to mow

    05/19/2008 4:58:05 PM PDT · by traumer · 26 replies · 608+ views
    PREGNANT man Thomas Beatie gets stuck into the garden chores – just weeks before his baby is due. The bearded transsexual, who stunned the world by showing off his swollen belly after swapping from a woman to a fella, happily trimmed his lawn – despite his delicate condition. And he had no qualms sweeping grass at the home he shares with wife Nancy in Bend, Oregon. Thomas, 34, is due to give birth to a girl by caesarean on July 3. He grew up female in Hawaii, but became a man in his 20s.
  • Homosexuality Common in the Wild, Scientists Say

    05/19/2008 5:14:35 PM PDT · by Pizonce11 · 95 replies · 1,270+ views
    As gay couples celebrate their newfound right to marry in California and opposition groups rally to fight the ruling, many struggle with this question: Is homosexuality natural? On this issue, Nature has spoken: Same-sex lovin' is common in hundreds of species, scientists say. Roy and Silo, two male chinstrap penguins at New York's Central Park Zoo, were a couple for about six years, during which they nurtured a fertilized egg together (given to them by a zookeeper) and raised the young chick that hatched. According to University of Oslo zoologist Petter Böckman, about 1,500 animal species are known to practice...
  • Jay Sekulow on 'Same-Sex Marriage' Case

    05/19/2008 4:01:50 PM PDT · by tcg · 9 replies · 341+ views
    Catholic Online ^ | 5/19/08 | Jay Sekulow
    By a vote of 4-3, the California Supreme Court struck down a state ban on same-sex marriage – changing the definition of marriage by judicial fiat. The decision is a disappointing one and represents another example of an activist judiciary that overreached by taking this issue out of the hands of the state legislature where it belongs. The California high court failed to uphold what the state legislature and an overwhelming majority of California voters clearly understand – that the institution of marriage is limited to one man and one woman.
  • Congressman Barney Frank Speaks Out On John McCain

    05/19/2008 2:14:40 PM PDT · by 2ndDivisionVet · 29 replies · 709+ views
    The Democratic Party ^ | May 19, 2008 | Rep. Barney Frank
    In a number of areas, Senator John McCain is praised for moderation that he has not in fact shown in his votes. It is true that by comparison to many of the angry right-wingers that have dominated the Republican Party with Senator McCain's general support he is less extreme and he has from time-to-time shown an amiability that contrasts with the snarling demeanor of some of his co-partisans. But all this shows is that it is possible to be prejudiced all of the time and pleasant some of the time when it comes to the rights of gay, lesbian, bisexual...
  • Sex Changes for Kids

    05/19/2008 10:34:46 AM PDT · by mykroar · 41 replies · 905+ views
    Fox News ^ | 051908 | Hillary Viders and Joseph Abrams
    Boston’s Children’s Hospital bills itself as the hospital for children — and now it’s also the hospital for children who want a sex change, a procedure some critics are calling “barbaric.” Dr. Norman Spack, a pediatric specialist at the hospital, has launched a clinic for transgendered kids — boys who feel like girls, girls who want to be boys — and he’s opening his doors to patients as young as 7.
  • Vatican says prohibition against gays in seminaries is universal [Open]

    05/19/2008 1:21:20 PM PDT · by NYer · 34 replies · 602+ views
    CNA ^ | May 19, 2008
    Vatican City, May 19, 2008 / 09:21 am (CNA).- Vatican Secretary of State, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, has sent a letter to the bishops of the world with the approval of Pope Benedict XVI reaffirming the norms established by the Congregation for Catholic Education in the 2005 document, “Instruction Concerning the Criteria for the Discernment of Vocation with regard to Persons with Homosexual Tendencies in view of their Admission to the Seminary and to Holy Orders,” as universal and without exceptions.  In the brief “Rescriptum ex audientia” –a written response to various queries—Cardinal Bertone said the norms establishing the selection...
  • Gay Rights vs. Democracy ... (California: constitutional democracy suffered a grievous blow)

    05/19/2008 5:29:27 AM PDT · by IrishMike · 13 replies · 441+ views
    Townhall ^ | Monday, May 19, 2008 | Dinesh D'Souza
    It is the essence of democracy that people should be able to decide the moral rules that govern the nature of a community. If people don't have that power, then they are living under an autocracy. True, this majority rule is not unlimited. It is limited by what the government has the power to do. Consequently the majority cannot, in general, vote to seize the homes and accumulated savings of rich people. Leaving aside exceptional cases, government cannot mandate how parents how should raise their children. These kinds of power lie outside the scope of government in a free society....
  • City clerk suing not to wed 'gays'

    05/19/2008 3:19:07 AM PDT · by Man50D · 13 replies · 428+ views
    WorldNetDaily.com ^ | May 18, 2008
    On the heels of last week's ruling legalizing same-sex marriages in California, a city clerk in England is suing her employer for the right not to officiate at homosexual weddings because of her faith. "I feel strongly about maintaining my Christian beliefs and conscience," Lillian Ladele told the London Telegraph. "I can't go against what it says in the Bible. I don't understand why the council can't use other people who have no problem with the ceremonies." Islington council in London informed the registrar she could be fired unless she agrees to preside at the ceremonies. Ladele claims "discrimination or...
  • Calif. Gay Marriage Ruling to Unleash Litigation

    05/19/2008 3:24:52 AM PDT · by Man50D · 14 replies · 542+ views
    CNSNews.com ^ | May 19, 2008 | Pete Winn
    The California Supreme Court's 4-3 decision last Thursday to create homosexual marriage was "a blockbuster" that sent a shockwave that will eventually reverberate in every state of the union, according to legal experts. "One of the principal effects of the California decision will be to create large numbers of same-sex marriages that will not only reside in California, but will migrate across the country," said Douglas Kmiec, a law professor at Pepperdine University Law School in Malibu, Calif. Kmiec, one of the nation's foremost legal scholars, told Cybercast News Service that the California court "tossed out the window" the view...
  • The bishop who doesn't back down: Robinson's book takes on sexuality, religion

    05/18/2008 8:54:07 PM PDT · by hiho hiho · 32 replies · 604+ views
    Concord Monitor ^ | May 18, 2008 | MIKE PRIDE
    Preachers give sermons. They ponder morality and seek to divine the will of God. They see stories not as narratives from which readers may draw their own conclusions, but as parables, useful for illustrating life lessons. In the Eye of the Storm, the new book by Gene Robinson, the Episcopal bishop of New Hampshire, is not the memoir it appears to be. It is not Robinson telling his story but Robinson expounding his opinions. How does a Christian deal with the Bible's harsh judgments, contradictory messages and archaic views? What does God have to say about sexuality? How has the...
  • Missouri Republican Rips "SF Values" in new TV Ad

    05/16/2008 1:57:37 PM PDT · by SmithL · 10 replies · 293+ views
    SFGate: Politics Blog ^ | 5/16/8 | Joe Garofoli
    With Thursday's California Supreme Court ruling regarding same sex marriage, we can expect a resurrection of one of the most shopworn political epiteths: San Francisco values. GOP Rep. Sam Graves unveiled an ad this week using the money phrase to disparage his Democratic challenger Kay Barnes, aka the "Big City Mayor" (formerly that is, of Kansas City.) Barnes' sin: She attended a fundraiser thrown by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and she shares Pelosi's "San Francisco Values." You know what that means. Or at least what it is supposed to mean. Nevertheless, you've GOT to see Graves' commercial only to check...
  • Takei On Recent California Marriage Decision [ "Mr. Sulu" Getting Married ]

    05/18/2008 4:07:17 PM PDT · by melt · 55 replies · 1,389+ views
    Trek Today ^ | 5/18/08 | T'Bonz
    After being with his partner for almost two dozen years, George Takei can now plan a marriage. As reported at GeorgeTakei.com, Takei is pleased that his same-sex relationship can lead to marriage in California with the recent decision of the California Supreme Court to permit same-sex marriage. "Our California dream is reality," said Takei. "Brad Altman and I can now marry. We are overjoyed! At long last, the barrier to full marriage rights for same-sex couples has been torn down. We are equal with all citizens of our state!" "The California Supreme Court further ruled that our Constitution provides for...
  • Homosexual activist "gaymilitaryman" claims - "A pet owner has more rights than me"

    05/18/2008 2:34:19 PM PDT · by doug from upland · 5 replies · 309+ views
    youtube discussion ^ | 5-18-08 | dfu
    Here is the YouTube sing-along that has sparked quite a discussion. I encourage you to join in, but behave. :) YOUTUBE - CALIFORNIA HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE AND A GOAT This guy will not admit that a man and woman raising a child is the ideal.
  • Did the California Supreme Court make the correct decision on Homosexual Marriage?

    05/18/2008 2:03:06 PM PDT · by TheEaglehasLanded · 40 replies · 893+ views
    LA Times Online Poll ^ | May 18, 2008 | the eagle has landed
    The poll is in the middle of the left hand column in the story that it was a tough decision for Ron George.
  • Gay Marriage in Texas?

    05/18/2008 12:03:08 PM PDT · by Dawnsblood · 13 replies · 446+ views
    ABC News ^ | 5/15/08 | Jan Crawford Greeburg
    A key question after today's sweeping California Supreme Court decision striking down the state's gay marriage ban is what it means for the 48 other states that don't recognize gay marriage. If, for example, a gay married couple in California moved to Texas, would Texas have to recognize their marriage? The short answer is no. States generally are not required to recognize a marriage performed in another state if it would violate their own public policy. Of course, the U.S. Constitution provides that states must give "full faith and credit" to other state laws and judgments---which suggests that other states...
  • CA marriage decision trumps the people's vote

    05/18/2008 12:56:05 PM PDT · by Jim 0216 · 27 replies · 409+ views
    OneNewsNow ^ | 5/16/08 | Ed Thomas
    "More disappointed than surprised" -- that describes the feelings of a California pro-family coalition working to place a marriage amendment question of the fall general election ballot. On Thursday the California Supreme Court ruled against Proposition 22 and other prohibitions against same-sex "marriage" in a 4-3 decision. In doing so, says Ron Prentice of ProtectMarriage.com, the court created new law instead of interpreting existing law. Prentice contends the decision completely disregards the vote of the people, which defined marriage as being between one man and one woman. That vote took place in March 2000; however, it did not protect the...
  • Governor(Schwarzenegger) backs same-sex marriage ruling

    05/18/2008 10:28:37 AM PDT · by kingattax · 12 replies · 320+ views
    San Francisco Chronicle ^ | May 17, 2008 | Matthew Yi
    A day after the state Supreme Court ruled that same-sex couples should have the right to marry in California, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said Friday that he supports the court's decision even though his personal view is that "marriage is between a man and a woman." Advocates of same-sex marriage have praised Schwarzenegger for embracing Thursday's decision, which overturned a voter-approved law allowing only opposite-sex marriage. They also expect him to make good on his promise last month to help fight a new initiative, aimed for the November ballot, that would overturn the court's ruling. But the Republican governor's stance on...
  • Unwise Haste on Gay Marriage

    05/18/2008 10:40:24 AM PDT · by neverdem · 10 replies · 411+ views
    realclearpolitics.com ^ | May 18, 2008 | Steve Chapman
    In the old story, a preacher gives an inspiring sermon, which he concludes by asking his congregants to stand up if they want to go to heaven. Everyone rises except one nervous-looking fellow. "Brother," asks the incredulous pastor, "don't you want to ascend to paradise when you die?" Says the holdout: "When I die? Sure! I thought you were getting up a group to go right now." That's pretty much how I feel about the California Supreme Court's decision granting the right of same-sex couples to marry. The destination is a good one. I just wish the court weren't in...
  • Anglican Acceptance of both Abortion & Life will Allow the Creation of a Gay Church: Robinson [Open]

    05/18/2008 10:26:40 AM PDT · by wagglebee · 34 replies · 428+ views
    LifeSiteNews ^ | 5/16/08 | Hilary White
    LONDON, May 16, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The Anglican Church is the perfect vehicle for creating a new “gay” Christianity by virtue of the fact that it is the only church that accepts the logical contradiction of asserting both the sanctity of human life and the existence of a right to abortion. Episcopal bishop Gene Robinson, whose ordination to the episcopate has precipitated the ongoing schism between traditionally Christian Anglicans and its ultra-liberal, secularized branches, is in London to talk about his vision for the homosexual future of the Anglican Church. He was visiting and promoting his cause in preparation...
  • A Lesbian Explains What’s Wrong With the California Gay Marriage Ruling

    05/18/2008 7:36:17 AM PDT · by Excuse_My_Bellicosity · 35 replies · 1,541+ views
    Men's News Daily ^ | May 17, 2008 at 8:41 am | Brunette Republican Sex Kitten
    Sorry to rain on everybody’s parade, but this isn’t a good thing. Of course, I have already explained why I believe that civil unions would be better for us than gay marriage. I have also explained why at this point I don’t want gay marriage at all. (For those of you who don’t want to click, I can sum it up: 1) no-fault divorce, 2) alimony and 3) Terri Schiavo.) Had California’s state legislature passed a law, I wouldn’t be complaining. I still wouldn’t be getting married, for the reasons I referred to above, but I’d have no objection to...
  • Polygamy? It's positively biblical

    05/18/2008 12:35:02 AM PDT · by ansel12 · 191 replies · 2,095+ views
    The Philadelphia Inquirer ^ | 5/18/08 | Martha Nussbaum
    What is wrong with polygamy? Nineteenth-century Americans coupled it with slavery, calling both "the twin relics of barbarism." Today, it is used as a scare image to deter people from approving same-sex marriage, lest it lead down a slippery slope to that horror of horrors. But what, exactly, is bad about it? Looking at the Texas sect at the Yearning for Zion ranch, so much in the news, will not tell us, because that sect allegedly forced underage girls into marriage. The case then becomes one of child sexual abuse, a crime hardly unknown in the monogamous family, although it...
  • Judges hasten cultural decline

    05/17/2008 11:12:16 AM PDT · by Graybeard58 · 73 replies · 1,124+ views
    Waterbury Republican-American ^ | May 17, 2008 | Editorial
    People gaze in disbelief at the cultural landscape — all the divorce, cohabitation, promiscuity, sexually transmitted disease, single moms, ill-mannered children, failing public schools, substance abuse, domestic violence, abortions, pornography and incivility — and can't fathom how America fell this far this fast. No one event triggered this devolution, but it undeniably was pushed along many times by the moral relativism of the last 50 years, when most of society's widely accepted norms were undermined by the quicksand of nonjudgmentalism; when the concepts of right and wrong, good and bad, were abolished in favor of differences that were to be...
  • California's Gift to McCain? ( Homosexual "marriage" )

    05/17/2008 6:28:56 AM PDT · by kellynla · 25 replies · 755+ views
    weekly standard ^ | 05/26/2008, Volume 013, Issue 35 | John McCormack
    Eight years ago, 4,618,673 California voters--61 percent of those casting ballots--approved an initiative that stated: "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California." Last Thursday, four of the seven justices of the California supreme court struck down that law, ruling that it violates the "fundamental constitutional right to form a family relationship." California chief justice Ronald George, writing for the majority, declared that "an individual's sexual orientation--like a person's race or gender--does not constitute a legitimate basis upon which to deny or withhold legal rights" and therefore "the California Constitution properly must be interpreted...
  • A Critique of the "Draft Social Statement on Human Sexuality"

    05/17/2008 8:13:04 PM PDT · by lightman · 11 replies · 236+ views
    LutheranCoRe ^ | May AD 2008 | Carl E. Braaten
    A Critique of the "Draft Social Statement on Human Sexuality" Prepared by the Task Force for ELCA Studies on Sexuality, Church in Society Evangelical Lutheran Church in America by Carl E. Braaten (May 2008) [You may also download the Critique as a pdf file.] I am aware that this social statement is a first draft. The Task Force has asked for suggestions and criticisms that might be helpful in producing an improved and final version. The authors of the document claim that it is based on Lutheran theological foundations. My critique will examine whether this proposed social statement is faithful...
  • LDS Church expresses disappointment in California gay marriage decision (ecumenic)

    05/17/2008 2:29:55 AM PDT · by restornu · 9 replies · 224+ views
    Deseret News ^ | Published: May 16, 2008 | By Carrie A. Moore
    Following the California Supreme Court's decision Thursday to overturn a ban on gay marriage there, both the LDS Church and the Catholic Archdiocese in San Francisco released statements about the decision, reiterating their views of marriage and commenting on the court's action. Both churches worked to help outlaw gay marriage in California several years ago. The LDS Church released the following statement: "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints recognizes that same sex marriage can be an emotional and divisive issue. However, the church teaches that marriage between a man and a woman is ordained of God and that...
  • CA Voters Should “Recall” Why Prop 22 Was Abandoned

    05/17/2008 5:00:17 PM PDT · by GaryWiram · 11 replies · 316+ views
    A Few Days With Figgins ^ | Saturday, May 17, 2008 | Gary Wiram
    In 2003, California held a statewide circus known as the Gubernatorial Recall election. That election actually considered two questions … Yes or No, should their sitting Governor, Gray Davis, be recalled? … And, if Yes, who of the 154 candidates should replace him? The slate of candidates included Actors, a Lieutenant Governor, a State Senator, Business People, a Porn Star, a Comedian, etc., etc. In the lead-up to this election, it seemed likely that Davis would be recalled. This gave the Republicans the opportunity to capture the Governorship of the nation’s most populous State from the Democrats. In my opinion,...
  • OU [Orthodox Jewish Union] DISMAYED BY COURT’S RECOGNITION OF SAME SEX MARRIAGE [Open]

    05/17/2008 11:17:52 AM PDT · by camerakid400 · 6 replies · 158+ views
    Today, the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America - the nation's largest Orthodox Jewish umbrella organization - expressed its opposition to the decision of the California State Supreme Court to overturn two laws defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman. The UOJCA had joined with other traditional groups in filing a legal brief in this case. Nathan J. Diament, director of public policy for the UOJCA stated: The Jewish tradition has always recognized the sanctity and special nature of the institution of marriage, and that only the relationship between a man and a woman can...
  • Schwarzenegger Backs Same-Sex Rulin ( Another "CINO" ) Published: May 17, 2008 at 8:30 AM

    05/17/2008 6:17:28 AM PDT · by kellynla · 15 replies · 389+ views
    upi.com ^ | May 17, 2008 at 8:30 AM | staff
    SAN FRANCISCO, May 17 (UPI) -- California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger told the San Francisco Chronicle's editorial board he backs a court ruling upholding the right of gay couples to marry. Schwarzenegger tried to clarify his sometimes confusing stance on gay marriage in the wake of Thursday's ruling by the California Supreme Court finding that same-sex couples should have the right to marry in the state, and said that he supports the decision. "First, I have always said that for me, marriage is between a man and a woman," he told the newspaper. "But I don't want to make everyone else...
  • Ellen DeGeneres and Portia de Rossi to wed. Will audience divorce?

    05/17/2008 5:23:14 AM PDT · by stillafreemind · 14 replies · 750+ views
    Associated Content ^ | may 17, 2008 | Bobby Tall Horse
    Since the California Supreme Court lifted the ban on gay marriages, Ellen DeGeneres has announced her plans to wed Portia de Rossi soon. The two have been going together since December of 2004. Is the viewing audience of Ellen ready for that? Or will they be ready to divorce Ellen for putting gay rights front and center?
  • Transgender lobby to intimidate petitioners

    05/17/2008 4:08:55 AM PDT · by Man50D · 22 replies · 463+ views
    WorldNetDaily.com ^ | May 16, 2008
    A lobby for homosexuals and transgenders in Maine has announced plans to shadow individuals who will be working to collect signatures on the "YES for Marriage and Equality" pro-family referendum, which is intended to put a marriage protection plan on the 2009 election ballot. In a report in the New England Blade this week, Betsy Smith, executive director of the Equality Maine activist organization, outlined "a plan that asks volunteers to stand with the people the [Christian Civic] League recruits to collect signatures for the petition." "I think it is disgusting that so-called 'gay' groups plan on harassing dear Christian...
  • Calif. referendum on gay marriage expected

    05/17/2008 1:59:03 AM PDT · by old-and-old · 20 replies · 504+ views
    AP ^ | AP
    SAN FRANCISCO - The California Supreme Court ruling legalizing gay marriage will not be the last word. California voters will almost certainly hold a referendum on a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage in November, and for the first time anywhere in the U.S., the vote will have a direct and immediate effect on gay couples waiting to tie the knot. The amendment needs a simple majority to pass, and if the voters reject gay marriage, their decision will supersede the high court’s. There are signs the contest’s outcome will be close.
  • CA Gay Marriage and the LDS (Open Vanity)

    05/17/2008 2:20:50 AM PDT · by Gamecock · 21 replies · 332+ views
    17 May 2008 | Gamecock
    Thesis: Remember when gay rights movement started? The gays stated their goal was just to be accepted. Since that time "accepted" has morphed into what we saw transpire in the California Supreme Court: full marriage rights to the gays. Very few saw this coming at the beginning of the Gay rights movement. The entire process was akin to putting a frog in a pot of cold water and gradually turning up the heat. THAT being said, is it outlandish to think that the restorationist LDS sectlets, such as the fLDS, will start bringing cases to court claiming their right to...
  • Obama Reaffirms Support For Same-Sex Unions [Agrees that ban on gay marriage unconstitional]

    05/16/2008 11:38:25 AM PDT · by Brilliant · 56 replies · 791+ views
    TPM ElectionCentral ^ | May 15, 2008 | Eric Kleefeld
    Barack Obama is sticking by his defense of same-sex unions, despite the likelihood that it will flare up as a general election issue because of today's California Supreme Court decision legalizing it. Here's the Obama camp's response to the court decision: "Barack Obama has always believed that same-sex couples should enjoy equal rights under the law, and he will continue to fight for civil unions as President. He respects the decision of the California Supreme Court, and continues to believe that states should make their own decisions when it comes to the issue of marriage." The Republicans are likely to...
  • Pope reaffirms Church’s stance against homosexual marriage

    05/16/2008 1:49:32 PM PDT · by NYer · 34 replies · 462+ views
    CNA ^ | May 16, 2008
    Vatican City, May 16, 2008 / 02:12 pm (CNA).- One day after California overturned a ban on same-sex marriage, the Holy Father has firmly stated that only marriage between a man and a woman is moral.Yesterday, California’s Supreme Court came to a 4-3 decision overturning the state’s law preventing homosexuals from being recognized as married.While the Pope did not directly mention the ruling in California in his address to the Forum of Family Associations and the European Federation of Catholic Family Associations, Benedict XVI stressed the importance of the traditional family for the good of society. "The union of...
  • Judicial Watch Statement on CA Supreme Court Ruling that Overturns Traditional Marriage

    05/16/2008 8:12:15 PM PDT · by T.L.Sink · 24 replies · 605+ views
    Judicial Watch issued the following statement on the ruling by the California Supreme Court that imposes same-sex marriage on the state: "Today, a bare majority of the California Supreme Court, in an audacious political power grab, usurped the democratic process by redefining marriage. The laws of this nation rely on the proper functioning of the courts, including a proper balance of powers, and the judiciary's ability to demonstrate restraint. This ruling undermines the rule of law. Bigamists and other 'polyamorists' will take solace in this activist and radical ruling because, if its logic is followed, it will be difficult to...
  • Pete Stark on Gay Marriage Decision: 'I wonder what they're going to do with the Mormons.

    05/16/2008 1:04:28 PM PDT · by JRochelle · 50 replies · 1,263+ views
    Campaign Spot ^ | 05/16/2008 | Jim Gerahgty
    Newly-announced Obama endorser and superdelegate, Rep. Pete Stark, talking about the California gay marriage decision on XM's POTUS08 earlier today: Rebecca Roberts, XM: Congressman Pete Stark of California, a new super-delegate for Barack Obama. I wanted to get your reaction, by the way, since you're a Californian, on the Supreme Court decision to overturn the ban on gay marriage. Stark: I think that was, you know... California usually leads on these issues of human rights and civil rights. I was quite proud of our state supreme court. We're going to have a big fight, because you know, the born-again Christians...
  • Reuters employs (mental) five-year-old to write story about gay marriage and the Pope.

    05/16/2008 6:51:30 PM PDT · by Balt · 9 replies · 395+ views
    Priestly Pugilist ^ | 5/16/2008 | The Priestly Pugilist
    Either the folks over at Reuters are incredibly stupid or ... actually, I don't think there's another option. First, the headline: Pope restates gay marriage ban after California vote.By Philip Pullella I didn't know the Catholic Church had a "gay marriage ban," did you? I know that "gay marriage" is an oxymoron, given that the Holy Mystery of Matrimony can only be received by a man and a woman; but that's not a ban; it's just reality. The Holy Father couldn't "allow" gay marriage anymore than he could allow the sky to be green and the grass to be purple....
  • CA Supreme Court Gives Voters the Finger, Allows Gay Marriage

    05/16/2008 6:21:04 PM PDT · by Left Coast Republican · 11 replies · 259+ views
    The Surfing Conservative ^ | 5/15/2008 | The Surfing Conservative
    Well, apparently the will of the people doesn't mean much in California, at least not in the eyes of liberal activist judges. The California State Supreme Court today overturned California laws that define marriage as a union between a man and a woman. One of those laws was a law passed by 61% of California voters in 2000 as a ballot proposition. What's particularly galling is that the decision was a 4-3 decision by the judges, so essentially one person's vote in the court was enough to overrule the will of 61% of the California electorate. Effectively the California court...
  • The Danger in Appeasing Gay Rights Activists

    05/16/2008 6:40:17 PM PDT · by Zender500 · 9 replies · 397+ views
    Human Events ^ | 05/16/2008 | Ernest Istook
    The law was just a plaything to California’s Supreme Court, and the justices twisted logic into a pretzel as they legalized same-sex marriage by judicial fiat. The court also exposed the danger created by wishy-washy lawmakers who push “civil unions” or “domestic partnerships” as a supposed middle-ground compromise. That actually is a deadly policy of appeasement. It was the very existence of such laws that the justices used to justify this outrageous decision. By trying to appease homosexual rights activists, those who have refused to stand up for traditional marriage helped to create this court ruling. They are the Neville...
  • Ontario Forces Taxpayers to Pay for “Sex-Change” Operations

    05/16/2008 4:45:14 PM PDT · by wagglebee · 62 replies · 476+ views
    LifeSiteNews ^ | 5/16/08 | Michael Baggot
    TORONTO, Ontario, May 16, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Ontario’s health insurance plan will pay for “sex-change” operations for the first time in a decade, Health Minister George Smitherman confirmed yesterday"(It would) probably affect between eight and 10 people in Ontario, who after having very, very sustained psychological evaluations would be deemed by the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health as appropriate candidates to receive a surgical intervention," Smitherman speculated.Ontario began covering the bill for “sex-change” operations in 1971, but ceased doing so in 1998 under the Progressive Conservative government.In 2006, the Ontario Human Rights Commission required compensation for three patients midway...
  • 6 Points On The California Gay Marriage Ruling

    05/16/2008 4:32:55 PM PDT · by stevelackner · 11 replies · 464+ views
    STEVELACKNER.COM ^ | May 16, 2008 | Steven W. Lackner
    Six points that I feel need to be made about this ruling: 1. This Is Social Liberalism By Judicial Fiat - This ruling came from none other than the Supreme Court of California, just as Massachusets allowed gay marriage by judicial fiat. Four justices (out of seven) should not be allowed to drastically change the entire definition of an institution that has existed for thousands of years of Judeo-Christian civilization and hundreds of years of American jurisprudence. Proponents of gay marriage cannot convince citizens of a single state to allow for same-sex marriage to be for anything but a man...
  • Ellen[Degeneres], Portia [de Rossi]: Here Come the Brides!

    05/16/2008 3:39:27 PM PDT · by 2ndDivisionVet · 55 replies · 1,786+ views
    E! Online ^ | May 16, 2008
    Ellen DeGeneres and Portia de Rossi are making it official. Hours after Thursday's landmark ruling by the California Supreme Court striking down a state law banning gay marriage, the 50-year-old daytime host announced during a taping of The Ellen DeGeneres Show that she and the 35-year-old former Ally McBeal star plan to swap vows. In the episode scheduled to air later today, studio audience members greeted DeGeneres' news with thunderous applause and a standing ovation as De Rossi watched from the sidelines. The show's publicist was unavailable for comment. Separately, in an interview with The Advocate Thursday, DeGeneres said she...
  • Mike Reagan: I Am Disgusted with California ("Gay Marriage")

    05/16/2008 2:57:37 PM PDT · by 2ndDivisionVet · 56 replies · 1,266+ views
    Newsmax ^ | May 16, 2008 | Phil Brennan
    Reacting to the decision of the California Supreme Court to ignore Proposition 22, which declares that “Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California," and was passed with a whopping 61 percent of the vote, an outraged Michael Reagan urged California voters to join him in refusing to vote for any ballot measures in the State of California in the 2008 November election since the courts can simply nullify their votes whenever they want to. Reagan, whose father Ronald Reagan served two terms as California’s governor before winning the presidency in 1980, said "I...
  • Marriage ruling a victory for Newsom

    05/16/2008 2:25:34 PM PDT · by SmithL · 10 replies · 330+ views
    San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 5/16/8 | Cecilia M. Vega
    San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom had barely been on the job a month back in 2004 when he ordered the city to issue marriages licenses to gay and lesbian couples. Thousands of same-sex partners flocked to City Hall to exchange vows. For four weeks, a steady stream of ceremonies stretched into the night, and lines of eager couples wrapped around the block. And as quickly as the couples could say, "I do," the scene of women marrying women and men marrying men sparked a nationwide uproar. Proponents called the move bold. Opponents called it defiant and blatantly illegal. People on...
  • Barr on gay marriage: California decision is how it’s supposed to work

    05/16/2008 6:46:02 AM PDT · by melt · 84 replies · 1,319+ views
    Libertarian presidential candidate Bob Barr says that when it comes to gay marriage, what happens in California is California’s own business. He’s a states’ rights man. Here’s the statement Barr’s issued, which — one week before the Libertarian national convention in Denver — is likely to generate some talk: “Regardless of whether one supports or opposes same sex marriage, the decision to recognize such unions or not ought to be a power each state exercises on its own, rather than imposition of a one-size-fits-all mandate by the federal government (as would be required by a Federal Marriage Amendment which has...
  • MAKING HISTORY | SAME-SEX MARRIAGE DECISION THE COURT

    05/16/2008 8:56:49 AM PDT · by DaveyB · 23 replies · 490+ views
    San Francisco Chronicle ^ | Friday, May 16, 2008 | Demian Bulwa
    Click on link to see story - copyright rules prohibit it's posting here. Bottom line 3 of the 4 judges in CA homo-marriage ruling were appointed by Republicans.
  • L.A. Mayor Villaraigosa Says He Will Officiate at Same-Sex Weddings (He's a Catholic?)

    05/16/2008 5:45:58 AM PDT · by kellynla · 58 replies · 840+ views
    Los Angeles Times ^ | May 15, 2008 | Jean-Paul Renaud
    Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa hailed the California Supreme Court decision today, saying he would officiate over as many same-sex weddings as possible. The mayor stood by leaders of the gay and lesbian community today, calling the high-court's decision a victory for California.