If you don't like this decision, then you are perfectly free to petition for a change in the law. For that matter, there is nothing stopping you from writing to the newspaper or protesting outside the courthouse.
But it is extremely rude to make personal attacks on someone just because you're mad at how the judges ruled in this case & are not happy with this law.
Throughout my posts on this topic, I have tried to argue how such a transaction could raise red flags in a reasonably-minded person. I have also tried to point out the hazards that may arise from such deals (such as the increased risk of theft, accidental loss, or damage to reputation if one party turns out to be not on the up-and-up).
I like to think that I can present my points on a matter objectively and politely. Why is it that several other posters on this topic can't do the same? This is only one of two forums that I participate in on the Internet; on the other forum, posters refrain from personal attacks, apologize if they give offense (inadvertently or otherwise), and are kept in line by other posters & moderators. It's too bad the same can't happen here at Free Republic.
Yep! It wasn't inadverdant... I posted my thoughts. You are free to do the same! Welcome to America.
"Throughout my posts on this topic, I have tried to argue how such a transaction could raise red flags in a reasonably-minded person. I have also tried to point out the hazards that may arise from such deals (such as the increased risk of theft, accidental loss, or damage to reputation if one party turns out to be not on the up-and-up)."
Why would the accidental loss of someone else's $ or damage to someone else's reputation concern you?