Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Clinton Gets Face-Off With Rumsfeld
AP ^ | August 3, 2006

Posted on 08/03/2006 8:35:13 AM PDT by presidio9

New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton was headed for a public showdown Thursday with Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld after he reversed course at the last minute and said he would testify before a Senate committee.

Clinton, D-N.Y., had criticized Rumsfeld in a letter and at a hearing Wednesday for choosing not to appear at a public hearing before the Armed Services Committee on Thursday. Clinton is a member of the committee.

The senator, who has not called for Rumsfeld's resignation, as have other Democrats, was strikingly critical of his track record Wednesday.

Before he reversed course, she wrote to him that "a public appearance before the committee is long overdue," noting it has been nearly six months since his last such testimony.

The Pentagon announced Wednesday night that Rumsfeld had changed his mind and would testify in the hearing.

After the announcement, Clinton said Rumsfeld's "11th-hour decision to reverse course and appear at tomorrow's open Armed Services Committee hearing is the right one, as the committee and the American people should hear directly from the top civilian leader at the Pentagon, the person most responsible for implementing the president's military policy in Iraq and Afghanistan."

The Pentagon announcement came as Clinton and other Senate Democrats led a new round of attacks on Rumsfeld's record in running the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

"I for one am deeply disturbed at the failures, the constant, consistent failures of strategy with respect to Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere," Clinton said Wednesday at an ASC hearing featuring a deputy defense secretary. "And I don't think that those failures can be appropriately attributed to our military leadership."

She argued that if Rumsfeld can meet senators privately, as he did Tuesday and planned to do Thursday, he should do so publicly.

"The American people deserve to see the principal decision maker when it comes to these matters that are putting our young men and women at risk," she said. "More than 2,500 of them have lost their lives. And this secretary of defense, I think, owes the American people more than he is providing."

The top Republican and Democrat on the committee, Sens. John Warner R-Va., and Carl Levin, D-Mich., had asked Rumsfeld in a July 26 letter to appear before the committee, saying they had questions about Iraq, Afghanistan and the recent violence in Lebanon between Israeli forces and Hezbollah.

The panel is also scheduled to hear testimony from Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Gen. John Abizaid, who leads Central Command.

Clinton's own position on Iraq has drawn fire from members of the anti-war wing of the Democratic Party, some of whom argue that her 2002 vote authorizing the war and continued support for the overall mission hurt her chances as a presidential candidate in the Democratic primary in 2008.

At a press briefing earlier Wednesday, Rumsfeld suggested that complaints about his decision could be politically motivated.

"Let's be honest: Politics enters into these things, and maybe the person raising the question is interested in that," said Rumsfeld, without identifying anyone.

The defense secretary said he had testified in the past and was not reluctant to face off against some of the committee's more vocal war critics, including Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass.

Rumsfeld last appeared before the committee on Feb. 7, when he and Pace were questioned about the war's strain on the military.

In the six months since, the number of U.S. troops in Iraq has dipped but now is back up to about 133,000, as part of an effort to quell the violence in Baghdad. The total could exceed 135,000 in the weeks and months ahead.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 109th; congress; hearings; hillary; partyoftreason; rumsfeld; ussenate; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

1 posted on 08/03/2006 8:35:13 AM PDT by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Sen. Clinton Gets Face-Off With Rumsfeld

Now if only we could convince her to leave it off.
2 posted on 08/03/2006 8:37:52 AM PDT by cripplecreek (If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I'm disappointed there is not a live thread on this. I know Fox is carrying it. Unfortunately I can't stay to watch it. Hope Rummy slams her big.


3 posted on 08/03/2006 8:38:58 AM PDT by TXKATE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Oh - here it comes....


4 posted on 08/03/2006 8:40:29 AM PDT by mikrofon (Defacing the Nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Yes, the same Hillary who accuses the president of being "divisive" abuses a national official all to help with a primary run in'08 showing the hypocrite she is. I'm SURE Rumsfeld was quaking in his boots. He probably just found it an interesting study in abnormal psychology.


5 posted on 08/03/2006 8:40:59 AM PDT by MikeA (Not voting out of anger in November is a vote for Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Now if only we could convince her to leave it off.

This AP story was available in about 10 different publications. I picked this one because I just loved that headline.

6 posted on 08/03/2006 8:41:21 AM PDT by presidio9 (“The term ‘civilians’ does not exist in Islamic religious law.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

What a putz. Here is Clinton already acting like she is President. And acting it certainly is because this woman is not at all qualified nor suitiable by any means to be President of the US. Someday I hope the people who are for her will realize how totally wrong and unqualified she is.


7 posted on 08/03/2006 8:41:33 AM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

"Someday I hope the people who are for her will realize how totally wrong and unqualified she is."

I hope that they realize it before she is elected..


8 posted on 08/03/2006 8:43:15 AM PDT by pnz1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
From the Museum of Bad Art ( MOAB )

PORTRAITURE #3 Mama and Babe

Acrylic on canvas by Sarah Irani, 1995 24"x30"

Donated by the artist

The flesh tones bring to mind the top shelf liqueurs of a border bistro. With an astonishing emphasis on facial bone structure, the artist flirts with caricature and captures features of Mamma's face which remind us of a former First Lady. The upright marionettish pose of the babe hints that the early bond between mother and child is as formal as it is familiar. Good old fashioned parental respect is at the center of this celebration of color and contour.

9 posted on 08/03/2006 8:47:30 AM PDT by InvisibleChurch (No.... wire .... hangers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnz1
"not at all qualified nor suitiable by any means to be President of the US."

In reality, even if the U.S. Constitution qualifications were not met, the Liberal Judges would rule the U.S.Constitution is "un-Constitutional", just to allow for it....

10 posted on 08/03/2006 8:48:22 AM PDT by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I would love to hear Rummy ask her a question:...

Rumsfeld:"Madam Senator, do you have a better idea?"

I can just hear the stammering and spin coming out of Hillary!



11 posted on 08/03/2006 8:49:06 AM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
---
HC:

"The American people deserve to see the principal decision maker when it comes to these matters that are putting our young men and women at risk," she said. "More than 2,500 of them have lost their lives. And this secretary of defense, I think, owes the American people more than he is providing."

----

mp:

OK. I'm at least willing to admit she probably has a point with the above.

----
HC:

"I for one am deeply disturbed at the failures, the constant, consistent failures of strategy with respect to Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere," Clinton said Wednesday at an ASC hearing featuring a deputy defense secretary. "And I don't think that those failures can be appropriately attributed to our military leadership."

----

mp:

However that comment makes her desire to 'get' Rummy abundantly clear. The Dems single focus on anything slightly smelling of failure prevents them from seeing the many, overwhelming success stories particularly in Afghanistan.

----

dr:

"Let's be honest: Politics enters into these things, and maybe the person raising the question is interested in that," said Rumsfeld, without identifying anyone.

----

mp:

Mr. Rumsfeld: will you please go to that meeting, tell as much of the truth as you can without putting our troops in any additional danger, and will you please put some serious smack-down on Mrs. "I'm wanna be the first female President" Clinton and that fat, red-faced drunk from Boston.

thank you.
12 posted on 08/03/2006 8:50:06 AM PDT by mad puppy ( The Southern border is THE issue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Can you say 'Pander'? I knew you could. See the ugly senator? She just got some poll results from the base of her party. They want her to be against the war but she knows she has to be for it if she's going to win the next election. So she decided to attack a man named Rumsfeld with a lot of angry words that don't mean much, but they sure sound good on tha tee vee and AP and Reuters can print them over and over and over again. Maybe she is kind of smart.


13 posted on 08/03/2006 8:51:56 AM PDT by AD from SpringBay (We have the government we allow and deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Rummy will smack her down, verbally.


14 posted on 08/03/2006 8:52:09 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Hillary's insulting tirade went beyond partisan politics, it was blistering, out of line, and outrageous. This was Hillary aucking up to the anti-war, far left fringe, looney left.


15 posted on 08/03/2006 8:53:29 AM PDT by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
At a press briefing earlier Wednesday, Rumsfeld suggested that complaints about his decision could be politically motivated.

"Let's be honest: Politics enters into these things, and maybe the person raising the question is interested in that," said Rumsfeld, without identifying anyone.

AP should have put these Rumsfeld remarks near the top of the article instead of toward the bottom to allow his view on the timing to be understood up front. But that's expecting too much journalistic professionalism from the hacks at AP.

16 posted on 08/03/2006 8:56:48 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

Let's face it, this is another non-event breathlessly reported by the press. So Hilary complained, so Rumsfeld will appear before a committee to listen to the Senators pontificate. Big deal.


17 posted on 08/03/2006 8:59:42 AM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

The mid-terms are three months away. The Dems on the ASC needed to drag the Secretary before them so they could get some good pontificating video and audio clips.


18 posted on 08/03/2006 9:00:01 AM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Related thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1677092/posts
Hillary attacks Rummy


19 posted on 08/03/2006 9:00:37 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

"And I don't think that those failures can be appropriately attributed to our military leadership."

I don't think I could have said it better myself!! Does this mean that all the media bashing of Bush re: Iraq and Afghanistan will cease?

After all, the POTUS is the Commander in Chief, the *TOP* military leader.


20 posted on 08/03/2006 9:01:35 AM PDT by RedRightReturn (Even a broken clock is right twice a day...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson