Posted on 10/29/2015 8:09:39 AM PDT by TexasCajun
Following Wednesday nightâs CNBC Republican presidential debate, on Thursdayâs CBS This Morning, co-host Charlie Rose repeatedly tried to lecture Senator Marco Rubio over Hillary Clintonâs role in the 2012 Benghazi attack.
After Rubio stated that he had not engaged in personal attacks throughout this campaign, Rose immediately rushed to defend Clinton and proclaimed that on the issue of Benghazi "Well, well, you called Hillary Clinton a liar, senator. You called Hillary Clinton a liar."
...
Rose continued to lecture the Florida senator and claimed âSenator, you know -- you know that -- The CIA was changing its own assessment of what happened there during that time zoneâ
...
If you're calling her a liar by saying she perpetuated a lie, then why do you think she did that? What was her motive?...So, you're saying that Hillary Clinton lied -- you were saying, senator, that Hillary Clinton lied because she wanted to help Barack Obama in his re-election campaign? That's a serious charge.
[W]ell, it's the truth. I mean, that is not only why she did it, that's why everyone in the administration did it. The narrative of their campaign at the time, Charlie, was that Al Qaeda was on the run and had been defeated. That was their narrative and this countered that narrative. -
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
Charlie Rose's face goes through one distortion after another as Rubio states the irrefutable facts this so called 'journalist' should know.
I dont need to see the video. I think everyone here is aware that Rose is a Democrap leftwing loser posing as a journalist.
Despite all the spin, the Media machine knows the Benghazi issues are doing serious damage to Hillary.
Charlioe got slammed by Rubio. Then his body language indicated that he knew he got slammed, arms crossed head down. He didn’t want to make it negative about Hillary and they spent more time on Hillary’s lies than the day she testified. LOL
Only certain Republican candidates are qualified to school the idiots in the media...
Charlie Rose, wilted yet again.
Why doesn’t Charlie get down on his knees and lick the sweat off of Hillary’s cankles?
An attack on Clinton would be saying sheâs senile or has cankles. Itâs not an attack to point out her lies.
The bastard journalists have over a year to crown Queen Hillary by eliminating all other pretenders to the throne.
I think I just thew up.
Charlie Rose = Paid Democrat Liar
“I only called Mrs. Clinton a liar, Charlie, because her testimony conclusively proved that she was a liar. That’s all...it’s pretty simple, pal.”
sell Rose to the arab slavers or something.
His time is well past.
But I almost feel sorry for him, having to sit at the news table with that horrid racist Gayle (I'm Martin's cousin) King and that obama sycophant Noreen O'Connell.
That's an attack? She is a liar!
How does Charlie Rose stay on the air?
That Hillary would lie for a campaign (and tell the truth in the email to her daughter) is obvious. What is less clear to me is whether Obama/Clinton were hiding much worse things. Such as taking weapons from Libya and sending them to Syria. Or, that they expected an attack, or wanted an attack, etc.
But, maybe the simplest explanation is best, they just lied for the campaign. (Why not swear the families to secrecy and tell them the truth though? Or get back to them after the election and make some apologies.)
LOL
I believe Rubio to be the finest debater of them all. He has perfect pitch, you hear him loud and clear, he doesn’t get in the weeds on policy but fires up and sells what he is saying, and his energy and passion come from his certainty about what he is saying.
I’m not saying he can’t be wrong, or be mistaken, but he is a very skilled debater. Charlie Boy was no match.
You got that right, for sure. Yikes, and ick!
Gail Yikes and Norah Ick.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.