Since Feb 18, 2004
El Conservo Tribe Member Names
holdonnow - 'Barks Back at Moonbats'
advertising guy - 'Sgt. War Paint Squirrel'
rightwingintelligentsia - 'FReeping Dove'
Ingtar - 'Miming Cranium'
navymom1 - 'Conservative Warpath Woman'
Kerretarded - 'Clubber of DUmmies'
Unrepentant VN Vet - 'Keeps Bears Away'
Eagleandliberty - 'rinohunter'
Clint N. Suhks - 'SITTING BOLONEY'
angcat - 'She who yells too much'
Fudd Fan - 'Fan of Fudd'
NeoCaveman - 'Avoids Fort Marcy Park'
bosco - 'flying bullet'
Biggirl - 'PodunkCatLover'
sono - 'Speaks Little, Says Much'
MNJohnnie - 'Roars like lion'
AliVeritas - 'Seeks Truth, Tells All'
lormand - 'runs with reagan'
RoadGumby - 'The Duck Monster'
Joisey - 'Taunts With Pictures'
mnehrling - 'Punches Hippies
cleveland gop - 'MAN ON FIRE'
penelopesire - 'Dances with Dittoheads'
IMissPresidentReagan - 'NeverForgotRonReagan'
Phantom Lord - 'Hates Liberals'
SE Mom - 'Screaming Eagle'
Brandie - 'American Warrior Dream Girl'
rightinthemiddle - 'sharp arrow'
Sensei Ern - 'Poo-Flinging Conservative Monkey'
American Quilter - 'Writes with Eagle Feather'
LachlanMinnesota - 'Two Dogs'
CottonBall - 'Lives in Woods'
TSchmereL - 'Brave Macaca-Waga'
Fawn - 'Strong Deer with Hope'
Hunton Peck - 'Runs with Turtles'
The Right Stuff - 'cavots with coyotes'
Fishtalk - 'Blogs With Forked Tongue'
Tamar1973 - 'Red Phoenix'
McGruff - 'One whos back bleeds'
KateUTWS - 'Communes with chocolate'
youturn - 'Matron of the Mountains'
sweet_diane - 'runs with scissors'
Mean Maryjean - 'Runs with Rush'
guinessman - 'Drinker of Extra Stout'
FaithintheRight - 'Strong Conservative Squaw'
50cal Smokepole - Fishes with Dynamite.
Navynucmom - Shoots with forked gun;
WorkerbeeCitizen-Wrestles With RINOs;
vacuumbob-Sitting Buck Sucker
eeevilConservative-Ultimate eeevil Leader
ChicagoConservative27-Big City Brave
TornadoAlley3-Wild Wind Warrior
acsrp38-Squaw Fly 'em Over Bear
tcw_laj4ALL- She who speaks with fish
LS-Teaches Skulls Full of Mush& #148;
arderkrag- Starver of Children
Matchett-PI Heap Big Sitting Bull-Sh*t Repeller
MinuteGal - Global Warming Keep Wigwam
Name Suggestion Pool
Dances With Supply-Siders"
Wrestles With RINOs
"Lunches with Rush"
"Dances With Feminazis"
"Whips with noodle"
"shoots with forked gun"
"Votes with Pinched Nose"
"Ballot like Butterfly"
"Hacker of the Touchscreen"
"Votes Early and Often"
"Digital Shirt of Brown"
"Feeds Mom Dog Food"
"Kick 'Ems in the Street"
"Racist, Sexist, Bigoted Homophobe"
"Brave with flat screen and flat head"
"Votes for Conservatives"
Llorts on Rush threads
Me with my arm around THE eeevil conservative!
A former US Army Infantryman, I joined Free Republic because I have reached the end of my tolerance for the absolutely stupid, criminal behavior of the Hysteric Left in this country. What the Left seems unwilling to grasp is this simple fact. No amount of money, peace vigils or encounter groups are going to keep them safe from people who are convinced their god wants all Americans dead. There are no ground for "peaceful coexistence" with the Islamic Terrorists. We have three choices, kill them, convert to Islam or die. Since I have no desire for the last two, the first is my choice
One of the really infuriating things in modern politics is the level of disinformation, misinformation, demagoguery and out right lying going on about the mission in Iraq. Democrats have spent the last 3+ years lying about Iraq out of a political calculation. The assumption is that the natural isolationist mindset of the average American voter, linked to the inherent Anti Americanism (what is misnamed the "Anti War movement") of the more feverish Democrat activists (especially those running the US's National "News" media) would restore them to national political dominance. The truth is the Democrat Party Leadership has simply lacked the courage to speak truth to whiners. The truth is that even if Al Gore won the 2000 election and 09-11 still happened we would be doing the EXACT same things in Iraq we are doing now.
Based on the political situation in the region left over from the 1991 Gulf War plus the domestic political consensus built up in BOTH parties since 1991 as well as fundamental military strategic laws, there was NO viable strategic choice for the US but to take out Iraq after finishing the initial operations in Afghanistan.
To start with Saddam's Iraq was our most immediate threat. We could NOT commit significant military forces to another battle with Saddam hovering undefeated on our flank nor could we leave significant forces watching Saddam. The political containment of Iraq was breaking down. That what Oil for Food was all about. Oil for Food was an attempt by Iraq to break out of it's diplomatic isolation and slip the shackles the UN Sanctions put on it's military. There there was the US Strategic position to consider.
The War on Islamic Fascism is different sort of war. in facing this Asymmetrical threat, we have a hidden foe, spread out across a geographically diverse area, with covert sources of supply. Since we cannot go everywhere they hide out, in fact often cannot even locate them until the engage us, we need to draw them out of hiding into a kill zone.
Iraq is that kill zone. That is the true brilliance of the Iraq strategy. We draw the terrorists out of their world wide hiding places onto a battlefield they have to fight on for political reasons (The "Holy" soil of the Arabian peninsula) where they have to pit their weakest ability (Conventional Military combat power) against our greatest strength (ability to call down unbelievable amounts of firepower) where they will primarily have to fight other forces (the Iraqi Security forces) in a battlefield that is mostly neutral in terms of guerrilla warfare. (Iraqi-mostly open terrain as opposed to guerrilla friendly areas like the mountains of Afghanistan or the jungles of SE Asia).
Did any of the critics of liberating Iraq ever look at a map? Iraq, for which we had the political, legal and moral justifications to attack, is the strategic high ground of the Middle East. A Geographic barrier that severs ground communication between Iran and Syria apart as well as providing another front of attack in either state or into Saudi Arabia if needed.
There were other reasons to do Iraq but here is the strategic military reason we are in Iraq. We have taken, an maintain the initiative from the Terrorists. They are playing OUR game on ground of OUR choosing.
Problem is Counter Insurgency is SLOW and painful. Often a case of 3 steps forward, two steps back. One has to wonder if the American people have either the emotional maturity, nor the intellect" to understand. It's so much easier to spew made for TV slogans like "No Blood for Oil" or "We support the Troops, bring them home" or dumbest of all "We are creating terrorists" then to actually THINK.
Westerners in general, and the US citizens in particular seem to have trouble grasping the fundamental fact of this foe. These Islamic Fascists have NO desire to co-exist with them. The extremists see all this PC posturing by the Hysteric Left as a sign that we are weak. Since they want us dead, weakness encourages them. There is simply no way to coexist with people who completely believe their "god" will reward them for killing us.
So we can covert to Islam, die or kill them. Iraq is about killing enough of them to make the rest of the Jihadists realize we are serious. They same way killing enough Germans, Italians and Japanese eliminated the ideologies of Nazism, Fascism and Bushido.
Americans need to understand how Bin Laden and his ilk view us. In the Arab world the USA is considered a big wimp. We have run away so many times. Lebanon, the Kurds, the Iraqis in 1991, the Iranians, Somalia, Clinton all thru the 1990s etc etc etc. The Jihadists think we will run again. In fact they are counting on it. That way they can run around screaming "We beat the American just like the Russians, come join us in Jihad" and recruit the next round of "holy warriors". Iraq is also a show place where we show the Muslim world that there are a lines they cannot cross. On 9-11-01 they crossed that line and we can, and will, destroy them for it -
If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a small chance of survival. There may even be a worse case: you may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves."