Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liz Cheney Would Be Fourth Republican Senator To Back Gay Marriage
Politix ^ | July 17, 2013 | David Mark

Posted on 07/17/2013 1:54:59 PM PDT by BillyBoy

Liz Cheney Would Be Fourth Republican Senator To Back Gay Marriage
Sen. Mike Enzi, her GOP primary opponent, opposes it

by David Mark
Editor-in-Chief


Liz Cheney, 2014 Republican Senate candidate in Wyoming, and daughter of former Vice President Dick Cheney. • AP

There are few policy differences between Wyoming Republican Senate candidate Liz Cheney and the incumbent she's trying to oust in 2014, Sen. Mike Enzi. Except for one issue: Gay marriage.

Unlike Enzi, the 46-year-old daughter of former Vice President Dick Cheney supports the right for states to legalize gay marriage. At least that's what she said in 2009, in an interview with MSNBC, of all places. At that was a time when the notion of same-sex marriage had considerably less support.

And that has even Daily Kos writer Scott Welch offering at least limited praise for Liz Cheney. Cheney, Welch writes:

Seemed to indicate tentative support for marriage equality and LGBT rights at large, saying: 'Well, look I think, you know, my family has been very clear about this, that we think freedom means freedom for everybody and that this is an issue that states have to decide for themselves.'

While Cheney's language is hardly a full-throated, ringing endorsement of equality ('this is an issue that states have to decide for themselves'), her aligning herself with her family is encouraging: her sister, Mary, who is an out lesbian and her father both are on record support marriage equality. She went on to reiterate opposition to a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage, expressed support for the State Department's extension of benefits to same-sex couples, and said, 'I think it's wrong to discriminate, in those relationships, based on someone's sexual preference.' Additionally, she supported repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell.

All this leads me to wonder, should we be rooting for Cheney in her primary campaign against Enzi? Don't get me wrong: I would abhor seeing either of them elected to the Senate. Both embrace the Tea Party agenda and the right's nutty conspiracy theories wholeheartedly. That being said, even if the primary is as ugly as possible, the winner of the GOP primary will, come 2014, be elected Senator in a state as ruby red as Wyoming. Given that either of them would both toe the Tea Party line if elected, why not root for Cheney in the hopes that she might be a sleeper vote for LGBT rights such as the Employee Non-Discrimination Act? It's hard to see on what issues she might be farther to the right than Enzi.

If elected, Cheney would be the fourth Republican senator to back same-sex marriage, along with Mark Kirk, Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Rob Portman (Ohio). Most Democratic senators have said they support gay marriage.



TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Wyoming
KEYWORDS: 2014midterms; cheney; enzi; homosexualagenda; lizcheney; logcabinrepublicans; mikeenzi; randsconcerntrolls; rinos; senate; wy2014; wyoming
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last
To: DTogo
Where is "marriage" in the Constitution?

The ultimate stated purpose of the document:

"To secure the Blessings of Liberty to Posterity."

If there's no real marriage, there can be no Posterity, much less a Posterity that is Blessed.

61 posted on 07/17/2013 3:17:49 PM PDT by EternalVigilance ('Si vis pacem, para bellum.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

As you promote the gay agenda throughout freerepublic, just as you are on this thread in defense of Liz Cheney’s candidacy which is titled “”Liz Cheney Would Be Fourth Republican Senator To Back Gay Marriage””, you should know that she is against a constitutional amendment to protect marriage.

Your path to gay marriage is a quick one, your support of the libertarian/leftist agenda is noted, again.


62 posted on 07/17/2013 3:19:30 PM PDT by ansel12 ( Santorum appeared on CBS and pronounced George Zimmerman guilty of murder, first degree. March-2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: DTogo
What pre-Constitutional legislation regarding/referencing “marriage” was that, back in 1780?

Widow benefits for federal service, legislation added to in years since, 1794, 1798, 1802, and so on.

63 posted on 07/17/2013 3:24:53 PM PDT by ansel12 ( Santorum appeared on CBS and pronounced George Zimmerman guilty of murder, first degree. March-2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

USED to LOVE Liz.....but “SAY NO TO LIZ”!!!!!!!!


64 posted on 07/17/2013 3:27:00 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion.....the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wellington VII

Noooo, it’s because of her LESBIAN SISTER!! IDIOCY!!! All DECENCY gets TRUMPED if your relative is a DEGENERATE!!!


65 posted on 07/17/2013 3:28:11 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion.....the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

geesh... THAT is NEVER going thru...get real.


66 posted on 07/17/2013 3:29:22 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion.....the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
This is a deal breaker for me. I had defended her earlier in other post, saying she would probably be better than Enzi. I take that back. There is no way I would support her now.
67 posted on 07/17/2013 3:34:19 PM PDT by Flavious_Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
there is no way that states will be allowed to ignore families that relocate or get transferred there by the federal govt, and military

They will continue to get Fed benefits but an non-gay state is under no compulsion to give state benefits.

Besides...the number of gay married people who work for the fed gov't and will be relocated is SO low.

Only 2% of the population is gay...even less are married or will get married (they are notoriously promiscuious) and even less have a federal job that will require relo.

68 posted on 07/17/2013 3:44:57 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

Thanks for posting this.

Any politician who supports gay marriage supports infringing on the first amendment since that freedom is always attacked by gay rights activists.


69 posted on 07/17/2013 3:46:46 PM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Just say NOOO!to Liz Cheney. Bob


70 posted on 07/17/2013 3:47:29 PM PDT by alstewartfan ("The atmosphere's too cold in here to attract a butterfly like that." Al Stewart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: RginTN

bump

cannot believe freepers would go for that


71 posted on 07/17/2013 3:47:51 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

She’s toast, I hope...
As much as I’ve liked her as a pundit, the pro-homo marriage does it for me.
What else would she turn on?
Good luck, WY....


72 posted on 07/17/2013 3:53:10 PM PDT by matginzac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forgotten man
It sounds like she is a “Rubio Conservative.” We will find her true colors if and after she is elected.

...when it will be too late.
73 posted on 07/17/2013 3:54:07 PM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

I love your screen name. It’s the nickname for male prostitutes in the P.I.


74 posted on 07/17/2013 3:55:54 PM PDT by rabidralph (Gray State Movie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12; All

I don’t think that we’re on the same sheet of music.

As I’ve mentioned elsewhere, I support only traditional one man, one woman marriage. My emphasis for states to regulate marriage is because that’s what California’s legal majoritity voters wanted. It’s only because of pro-gay, PC interpretations of the Equal Protections Clause of Sec. 1 of the 14th Amendment by activist justices and CA judges that CA still has gay marriage.

Regarding Liz Cheney, again, Mr. Mark’s article wrongly implies that federal government can regulate / define marriage.


75 posted on 07/17/2013 3:56:36 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

I don’t live there but I’d never vote for her.


76 posted on 07/17/2013 4:24:19 PM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

What about her position says that she supports gay marriage?


77 posted on 07/17/2013 4:33:29 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every liberal and WOD defender is a totalitarian screaming to get out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Not all her beliefs are known. I admit I was taken in. Now I’m a skeptic about LC


78 posted on 07/17/2013 6:14:09 PM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


79 posted on 07/17/2013 6:36:26 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (McCain or Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Birds of a feather / Partisan Media Shills: additional:
80 posted on 07/17/2013 6:36:41 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (McCain or Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson