As you promote the gay agenda throughout freerepublic, just as you are on this thread in defense of Liz Cheney’s candidacy which is titled “”Liz Cheney Would Be Fourth Republican Senator To Back Gay Marriage””, you should know that she is against a constitutional amendment to protect marriage.
Your path to gay marriage is a quick one, your support of the libertarian/leftist agenda is noted, again.
I don’t think that we’re on the same sheet of music.
As I’ve mentioned elsewhere, I support only traditional one man, one woman marriage. My emphasis for states to regulate marriage is because that’s what California’s legal majoritity voters wanted. It’s only because of pro-gay, PC interpretations of the Equal Protections Clause of Sec. 1 of the 14th Amendment by activist justices and CA judges that CA still has gay marriage.
Regarding Liz Cheney, again, Mr. Mark’s article wrongly implies that federal government can regulate / define marriage.