Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ancient DNA Tells Tales of Humans' Migrant History
Popular Archaeology ^ | Wednesday, February 21, 2018 | editors Vol. 29 Winter 2018

Posted on 03/03/2018 12:13:33 PM PST by SunkenCiv

Reich and a cast of dozens of collaborators chart the spread of an ancient culture known by its stylized bell-shaped pots, the so-called Bell Beaker phenomenon. This culture first spread between Iberia and central Europe beginning about 4,700 years ago. By analyzing DNA from several hundred samples of human bones, Reich's team shows that only the ideas -- not the people who originated them -- made the move initially. That's because the genes of the Iberian population remain distinct from those of the central Europeans who adopted the characteristic pots and other artifacts.

But the story changes when the Bell Beaker culture expanded to Britain after 4,500 years ago. Then, it was brought by migrants who almost completely supplanted the island's existing inhabitants -- the mysterious people who had built Stonehenge -- within a few hundred years. "There was a sudden change in the population of Britain," says Reich. "It was an almost complete replacement."

(Excerpt) Read more at popular-archaeology.com ...


TOPICS: History; Science; Travel
KEYWORDS: beakerpeople; bellbeaker; dietandcuisine; epidemics; godsgravesglyphs; helixmakemineadouble; pandemics; plagues; thesniffles
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: Rurudyne; SunkenCiv; All

If the ancient British population replacement was mostly by males, wouldn’t there still be a significant amount of mitochondrial DNA from the earlier population. Also was the almost total replacement true for Wales, Ireland and Scotland?


21 posted on 03/04/2018 1:47:29 PM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin

I was just going by what the article said.

At any rate, yeah, I would suspect that you’d be right.


22 posted on 03/04/2018 1:51:03 PM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin
I'm not too sure we should rely very much on DNA studies in the first place, but in this case, the neolithic samples they're working with must be very small in number. That doesn't answer your mtDNA question, apologies.

23 posted on 03/04/2018 3:23:53 PM PST by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson