Free Republic

I want you to pick up the phone and call a charity. Ask them that exact question. Let me know how it goes. get back to me after you’ve done that.

Which is *precisely* what I responded to. If you really meant to say something else, then you should have said so, rather than expecting complete strangers to read your mind.

This is a dumb question that illustrates the dumbing down that modern evanjellycalism has undergone.

It’s not a spiritual question.

It’s intention is to be emotionally manipulative.

It presumes to grant some kind of moral authority, by falsely appealing to Jesus, to support something that God’s Word actually forbids, once you get past the little list of out of context verses used to demand that we “luv da stwanger.”

We shouldn’t be worried about what some charity thinks if we don’t want to support illegal immigration.

*Charities* should be worried about what *we* think if they do support it.

For people who claim to be worried about other peoples’ racism, blacks sure do seem to be awfully ethnonarcissistic...

Agreed.

But how do you plan on doing it? Voting in a thoroughly rigged system obviously isn’t going to do it.

Typical conservative - see the problem, but do nothing about it for fear of seeming radical or mean.

And this is why state govts need to be supported, even if they have to shoot “protestors.”

It’s safe to say at this point that FedGov has zero moral legitimacy and that secession and a realignment of the various states to better suit their own interests is definitely legitimate and right.

Bet he votes the way they want him too now.

Well, you’re free to be deluded.

Yeah, but it describes the part that actually founded and built the country and from whom the country’s culture, language, laws, mores, and religion derive. Hence, the “heritage” part of “heritage American.”

Keep in mind they had almost four months now to “prep” the machines for this “forensic audit.”

Basically it refers to pre-1965 Americans who were primarily of European origin and who shared the same basic culture and assumptions as our British-derived founding.

Um, what do you think they are?

So...enforce the law anywise and tell the judge to pound sand. It’s time for states to start nullifying, interdicting, and ignoring.

It strikes me that 105 million people who collectively decided to be unpoliceable would be much, much more than all the federal agencies and the military combined would be able to deal with.

True.

However, what’s needed is a law that not only fines these companies, but also remits a portion, say half, to the person or group who was censored. That will put the tech companies in the position of directly supporting and funding the people they wanted to stop. Instead of silencing someone, you just gave them a few million that they might just use to spread the word for whatever message you were censoring them for. Yes, it’s pocket change for Twitter or Facebook, but it undercuts their “moral” reasoning for censorship.

Next thing you know, they’re gonna tell us that McDonalds burgers aren’t really beef...

Yeah, but FedGov doesn’t bother obeying the Constitution, which is why states need to be willing both to nullify AND to use force to enforce that nullification.